- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Over/Under on bad calls from refs in Bama game.
Posted on 11/7/13 at 3:40 pm
Posted on 11/7/13 at 3:40 pm
Ok for anyone who thinks that the SEC wants anything other than a Bama win this weekend, I can name 18million reasons why you are wrong. The payout this year for the BCS-NC game per team will be $18mil "minimum" could be higher. And the reality is if Oregon, FSU & Ohio St. all win out then Bama is the only shot the SEC has of making that game. So having an undefeated team from the SEC this year is becoming more important than in years past in order to make the NC-game.
So no if's, and's or but's about it the SEC officiating crew will be doing everything in it's power to help Bama when they can. How many bad "blatantly" calls that could affect the outcome of the game if called correctly, do you think will be made against LSU?
I think there will be at least 5 calls throughout the game that the refs will call in favor of Bama that will be bad calls, that will help Bama with the outcome of this game.
So no if's, and's or but's about it the SEC officiating crew will be doing everything in it's power to help Bama when they can. How many bad "blatantly" calls that could affect the outcome of the game if called correctly, do you think will be made against LSU?
I think there will be at least 5 calls throughout the game that the refs will call in favor of Bama that will be bad calls, that will help Bama with the outcome of this game.
11
Posted on 11/7/13 at 3:41 pm to Dudebro2
20.
There's your excuse.
Happy?
There's your excuse.
Happy?
Posted on 11/7/13 at 3:43 pm to Dudebro2
quote:
I think there will be at least 5 plays throughout the game that will be the cause of Bama winning.
FIFY
FWIW, let's not start blaming the refs for helping the gumps if they win unless it's blatantly obvious. If we lose, it's because we weren't prepared and didn't show up for this game and give 100% effort. If that fails to happen, you tip your cap and hope we get better down the road. What other teams do or refs do, should not affect what we do.
Posted on 11/7/13 at 3:44 pm to Dudebro2
I was thinking 4. One that is reviewed as well.
Posted on 11/7/13 at 3:53 pm to Dudebro2
Although:
1. this subject's been beaten to death
2. it comes off as whiney
3. i don't think a bad call has ever lost us a game against Bama
4. Miles' record against Bama is a really good indication of the respective team's abilities (Alabama being just slightly better)
although all of the above is true, my blood still boils every time I watch a replay of the Peterson (non) interception.
it's (no)calls like that one that gives this thread topic what little merit it possesses.
1. this subject's been beaten to death
2. it comes off as whiney
3. i don't think a bad call has ever lost us a game against Bama
4. Miles' record against Bama is a really good indication of the respective team's abilities (Alabama being just slightly better)
although all of the above is true, my blood still boils every time I watch a replay of the Peterson (non) interception.
it's (no)calls like that one that gives this thread topic what little merit it possesses.
Posted on 11/7/13 at 3:53 pm to Dudebro2
quote:And I'm out.
Ok for anyone who thinks that the SEC wants anything other than a Bama win this weekend,
Posted on 11/7/13 at 3:58 pm to Dudebro2
It's not so much the bad calls. It's the little things over the course of an entire game that piss me off. Ball spots, and no calls will work against us. Got to keep the cheating subtle.
Posted on 11/7/13 at 4:02 pm to UncleLogger
It's the non-calls that hurt the most. The shite that we can't see on the tele.
Posted on 11/7/13 at 4:02 pm to ell_13
quote:
20.
There's your excuse.
Happy?
This. Is there any fanbase "whinnyer" than LSU? It's embarassing
Posted on 11/7/13 at 4:06 pm to Dudebro2
The payout of the other BCS bowls is 17 million.
Posted on 11/7/13 at 4:10 pm to Dudebro2
LSU will get 1 moderately bad call, maybe two so they can say it went both ways.
Bama will get 4-5 moderately bad and 1 horribly bad call.
That's if it's close though.
If it isn't close Bama will only get 3 moderately bad calls, mostly on first downs plays (holding)
Bama will get 4-5 moderately bad and 1 horribly bad call.
That's if it's close though.
If it isn't close Bama will only get 3 moderately bad calls, mostly on first downs plays (holding)
Posted on 11/7/13 at 4:14 pm to Drew Orleans
I predict exactly 0 holding calls against the Gumps.
Posted on 11/7/13 at 4:16 pm to Dudebro2
I just hope the crew run by the guy from deliverance isn't on the game.
Posted on 11/7/13 at 4:50 pm to ell_13
quote:
20.
Pessimistic aren't we????
quote:
There's your excuse.
No excuses we lose, we lose. But if we lose, I just want to lose fair and square without any help from the zebra's which I have no confidence that will happen.
If you don't think that LSU is not only playing against Bama this Saturday and the Zebra's than you really don't have a clue how big business works. And no matter what anyone thinks, college football and the BCS-NC game is big business.
Posted on 11/7/13 at 4:53 pm to Dudebro2
it only takes 1 or 2 to kill LSU's momentum. Bama refs are pro's at that
Posted on 11/7/13 at 4:54 pm to Dudebro2
quote:
Over/Under on bad calls from refs in Bama game.
If you are already worrying about the refs. You have a loser mentalilty. If ANYTHING the NCAA wants LSU to WIN. They want someone other than an SEC team in the title game.
Posted on 11/7/13 at 4:57 pm to LSU1NSEC
Everyone knows you have to beat both bama and the refs. Its always been that way. Worse now that $abun is there.
Now, especially since bama is the only one left in the SEC that can make the big game, it will be even worse if the game is close.
Now, especially since bama is the only one left in the SEC that can make the big game, it will be even worse if the game is close.
Posted on 11/7/13 at 4:57 pm to dukke v
quote:
If ANYTHING the NCAA wants LSU to WIN.
It's the SEC office, not the NCAA, who selects the refs for the game.
Posted on 11/7/13 at 4:59 pm to dukke v
quote:
If ANYTHING the NCAA wants LSU to WIN. They want someone other than an SEC team in the title game.
Wow you are one stupid m-fer!!!!
This has nothing to do with the NCAA, the NCAA does not appoint the ref's the SEC appoints the officiating crew, are you really that stupid???
The SEC will appoint and officiating crew and that crew will understand the importance of an undefeated SEC team this year. Has nothing to do with anything other than having an undefeated team going to the BCS_NC game and the 18million reasons why they will want it that way. If the roles were reversed and it was a 2-loss Bama team playing #1 undefeated LSU, believe me the zebra's would be helping us.
Posted on 11/7/13 at 5:04 pm to MoreOrLes
quote:
Now, especially since bama is the only one left in the SEC that can make the big game, it will be even worse if the game is close.
That is the whole point, LSU is seriously going to have to dominate Bama in this game to win. Because if it is close, the no calls and the bad calls are going to make a difference.
Wish it wasn't that way, but it is what it is. I understand it, the best thing for the SEC is for Bama to go undefeated and if they can influence that in anyway, like I said, they have 18million reasons to try.
Page 1 of 2
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News