- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Gravity Theory Thread (spoilers)
Posted on 10/20/13 at 6:41 pm
Posted on 10/20/13 at 6:41 pm
Apologies if this has already been asked:
Does anyone think that the Russians blew their own satellite up on purpose, knowing that the US was installing new spy technology, and that the ensuing chain reaction would take it out during installation?
The idea that Ryan's device is for spying was alluded to early in the film. It was an old satellite that the Russians blew up...
Was this intentional?
Does anyone think that the Russians blew their own satellite up on purpose, knowing that the US was installing new spy technology, and that the ensuing chain reaction would take it out during installation?
The idea that Ryan's device is for spying was alluded to early in the film. It was an old satellite that the Russians blew up...
Was this intentional?
2
Posted on 10/20/13 at 7:10 pm to Broseph Barksdale
I saw it today. The premise didn't make much sense. I liked Clooney's character and Bullock came off as whiny the entire time.
Special effects were great though so I wasn't disappointed. 98% though? I dunno. Without IMAX I probably would think it was rotten
Special effects were great though so I wasn't disappointed. 98% though? I dunno. Without IMAX I probably would think it was rotten
Posted on 10/20/13 at 8:00 pm to Cajun Revolution
It was good until the movie became the Sandra Bullock show.
She frickin SUCKS as an actress
She frickin SUCKS as an actress
Posted on 10/20/13 at 8:25 pm to Marciano1
She wasn't bad
Posted on 10/20/13 at 8:28 pm to Broseph Barksdale
Weren't they working on the Hubble telescope? I don't think there is any spy equipment there.
This post was edited on 10/20/13 at 8:31 pm
Posted on 10/20/13 at 8:28 pm to Carson123987
It could've been worse, but some of the stuff she did (i.e. keying the Russian and Chinese symbols/buttons in the system, hopping the different pods, etc.) was somewhat unrealistic.
Posted on 10/20/13 at 9:10 pm to ladytiger118
Bullock was fine, some people just need something to complain about....... As far as the OP goes, i think Putin was skeet shooting and hit Mars
This post was edited on 10/20/13 at 9:11 pm
Posted on 10/20/13 at 10:18 pm to fleaux
I don't know if you're looking into it more than was intended. Seemed like they just had an idea and went with it. Not underlying things. Just my opinion.
Posted on 10/21/13 at 8:08 am to fleaux
quote:This.
Bullock was fine, some people just need something to complain about.
Posted on 10/21/13 at 9:11 am to fleaux
quote:
Bullock was fine
Of course she was, but it's cool as frick to shite on her as an actress these days. Same with Clooney.
Saw the movie over the weekend and it was awesome. Sure, a couple things were farfetched, but it's a movie and the things they did made sense.
Definitely one of the most gorgeous movies I've ever seen in theaters...it truly is made to be seen in 3D (and IMAX if possible).
Posted on 10/21/13 at 9:51 am to Marciano1
quote:
e frickin SUCKS as an actress
Really?? I mean really? That's what ruined the movie for you?
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News