- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Best way to invest $50-$100 a month..
Posted on 10/20/13 at 10:57 am to Chris Farley
Posted on 10/20/13 at 10:57 am to Chris Farley
Cause the difference between 15 and 30 years is almost a couple hundred thousand.. Pay it off in 15 years and then that 1500 plus can be used to invest and your not paying out more to interest
1
Posted on 10/20/13 at 11:17 am to CENLALSUFAN
Yea, but can you get more than 4.25% investing that money now? That's what it really comes down to. Interest rates will be much higher than 4.25% in the next few years and having money borrowed at that rate will be a hell of a deal.
Posted on 10/20/13 at 11:58 am to Chris Farley
Alright.. I think I see what your saying..
Posted on 10/20/13 at 2:41 pm to roguetiger15
quote:
8.6
Interesting.
I can't find the data a little past 10 years (especially on returns rather than share value) to confirm or deny this.
IDK then....I'd still be leary of investing in something so heavily in junk bonds
Posted on 10/20/13 at 5:04 pm to Volvagia
A simple yahoo finance search give you the yearly returns since conception
Posted on 10/20/13 at 8:14 pm to roguetiger15
But that isn't past 20 years, is it? Which is what I said I was trying to independently find.
I don't pay attention to "since inception" for very old actively traded funds.
Financial climate is VASTLY different.
You are over a wide range of managers, the high average could be from a single manager that kicked arse 30 years ago.
The fund strategies given to the managers probably has changed several times.
So I consider data from more than 20 years or so to be largely irrelevant.
Now a passively traded index fund, more is better.
I don't pay attention to "since inception" for very old actively traded funds.
Financial climate is VASTLY different.
You are over a wide range of managers, the high average could be from a single manager that kicked arse 30 years ago.
The fund strategies given to the managers probably has changed several times.
So I consider data from more than 20 years or so to be largely irrelevant.
Now a passively traded index fund, more is better.
Posted on 10/20/13 at 8:52 pm to Volvagia
It gives you the returns for every year, average out the last 20 years and you'll get the number I posted earlier
Posted on 10/20/13 at 9:01 pm to roguetiger15
Oh...that's what you meant..
*wanders off to check*
*wanders off to check*
Posted on 10/20/13 at 9:13 pm to CENLALSUFAN
No load vanguard index fund used as a Roth IRA- hands down!!!
Posted on 10/21/13 at 8:50 am to roguetiger15
quote:
roguetiger15
Shoot me an email.
coincollections@hotmail.com
You mentioned last week you were a broker in Lafayette and could direct/help me out getting an account setup.
Page 4 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News