- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Thoughts on trade
Posted on 10/17/13 at 10:34 am
Posted on 10/17/13 at 10:34 am
I'm thinking of offering a guy in my league. Biial Powell and Andre Johnson for Eddie Lacy and Hakeem Nicks. I'm getting Lacy and Nicks. Is this a decent trade? My rbs are Charles, randle, McFadden and Wrs are Wayne, Sanders, and Harvin
3
Posted on 10/17/13 at 10:41 am to Sader1990
thats an outstanding trade for you, no way the guy does it unless he is just a total fool.
your getting the best 2 players in the trade, and lacy could be an absolute stud in the 2nd half of this season
your getting the best 2 players in the trade, and lacy could be an absolute stud in the 2nd half of this season
Posted on 10/17/13 at 10:44 am to LSU-MNCBABY
If the giants trade nick, that trade could be considered "trade rape".
Posted on 10/17/13 at 10:47 am to Voorhies7
Nicks and Johnson at this moment are about even with Johnson having the advantage due to receptions. I don't really know much about Nicks being traded or what situation he might go to if traded.
Lacy is a LOT better than Powel. It isn't as bad as hinted at earlier, but it is still a bad trade for the Lacy owner and one that I wouldn't accept if him.
Lacy is a LOT better than Powel. It isn't as bad as hinted at earlier, but it is still a bad trade for the Lacy owner and one that I wouldn't accept if him.
Posted on 10/17/13 at 11:11 am to Peazey
Yea I figured it was a better trade for me. I forgot that lacy missed a couple weeks and that's why his season totals are down. He just picked up Rueben Randle and Kennan Allen on waivers so I feel like he might give up Nicks. What about if I switch McFadden and Powell out? He also has rice, Ridley, and pierce.
Posted on 10/17/13 at 11:17 am to Sader1990
It looks like Nicks is going to be traded before the dealine Oct 29th. It depends where nicks ends up really.
Johnson > Nicks at the moment.
Lacy is getting better and is a far better option than powell.
Johnson > Nicks at the moment.
Lacy is getting better and is a far better option than powell.
Posted on 10/17/13 at 11:22 am to Sader1990
If you are making this trade with getting lacy back then you are going to have to lower what you are requesting at wr by a lot. If you are trying to get Nicks then you have to lower what you are requesting at rb.
Maybe:
Johnson/Powell for Nicks/Pierce (not a good trade for you but one he might accept)
Not sure how to balance the other trade without seeing full rosters.
Maybe:
Johnson/Powell for Nicks/Pierce (not a good trade for you but one he might accept)
Not sure how to balance the other trade without seeing full rosters.
Posted on 10/17/13 at 11:28 am to Peazey
quote:
Johnson/Powell for Nicks/Pierce (not a good trade for you but one he might accept)
This is terrible and almost LoL!
WR1 for a WR2
RB2 for a Non starting RB.
No one would make this trade. At least i hope not. If so, i want to be in that league.
I know this is not the trade on the table, but peeps will laugh if you would try something like this.
This post was edited on 10/17/13 at 11:30 am
Posted on 10/17/13 at 11:43 am to Bhodges
He is a Powell and Johnson. Given the information I had, I was just showing him a trade that would be accepted. The other one he was thinking about wouldn't about was too unbalanced the other way. I said it would be a bad trade for him. Learn to read good.
Posted on 10/17/13 at 11:46 am to Bhodges
My roster:
Qb: luck, Wilson, Bradford
RB: Charles, McFadden, Powell
Wr: Wayne, Johnson, Harvin, sanders
Te: Thomas
Def: saints and panthers
K: Crosby
His roster:
Qb: Stafford, Smith
RB: pierce, Ridley, rice, lacy
Wr: bowe, allen, nicks, randle, Cobb IR
Te: Witten
Def: bengals
K: Hauscka
We play Qb, 2 RB, 3 Wr, Te, K, and Def. No PPR
Qb: luck, Wilson, Bradford
RB: Charles, McFadden, Powell
Wr: Wayne, Johnson, Harvin, sanders
Te: Thomas
Def: saints and panthers
K: Crosby
His roster:
Qb: Stafford, Smith
RB: pierce, Ridley, rice, lacy
Wr: bowe, allen, nicks, randle, Cobb IR
Te: Witten
Def: bengals
K: Hauscka
We play Qb, 2 RB, 3 Wr, Te, K, and Def. No PPR
Posted on 10/17/13 at 11:53 am to Peazey
quote:
He is a Powell and Johnson
It's hard to read what you are typing.
Yes I know he has Powell and Johnson. You suggested he trade these for Nicks/Pierce, which is laughable. No way anyone makes this trade!
quote:
The other one he was thinking about wouldn't about was too unbalanced the other way.
This $hit is hard to read!
quote:
Learn to read good.
You Sir need to Learn how to read and type!
This post was edited on 10/17/13 at 11:57 am
Posted on 10/17/13 at 12:02 pm to Sader1990
I think you should sit tight at the moment.
You aren't going to get Lacy and Nicks for Johnson and Powell.
You would have to replace McFadden for powell.
I would sit tight with McFadden and see how he performs after the bye.
I see you are in a pickle with the Mcfadden bye week and are trying to make a deal.
Powell is a decent play this week. He'll get more touches now that goodson is out. Hopefully he can continue to get the bulk of the work over ivory. (Which has been the case)
You aren't going to get Lacy and Nicks for Johnson and Powell.
You would have to replace McFadden for powell.
I would sit tight with McFadden and see how he performs after the bye.
I see you are in a pickle with the Mcfadden bye week and are trying to make a deal.
Powell is a decent play this week. He'll get more touches now that goodson is out. Hopefully he can continue to get the bulk of the work over ivory. (Which has been the case)
This post was edited on 10/17/13 at 12:05 pm
Posted on 10/17/13 at 12:09 pm to Bhodges
I just got McFadden in a trade. I traded Nelson and Richardson for McFadden, Sanders, and Thomas
Posted on 10/17/13 at 12:23 pm to Sader1990
Ahh I see. Somebody got you in a buy low situation with Trich.
Who was your TE before the trade?
You should have traded Wayne or Johnson before nelson.
Interesting on who your TE was before the trade.
You should have stuck with Trich and Nelson bro now you dont have a WR3 to play.
Charles and Trich
Nelson, Wayne, Johnson
Thats Nasty!
Who was your TE before the trade?
You should have traded Wayne or Johnson before nelson.
Interesting on who your TE was before the trade.
You should have stuck with Trich and Nelson bro now you dont have a WR3 to play.
Charles and Trich
Nelson, Wayne, Johnson
Thats Nasty!
This post was edited on 10/17/13 at 12:28 pm
Posted on 10/17/13 at 12:29 pm to Bhodges
I wasn't happy with Richardson. Thought the trade to the colts would change things. My tight ends were Rudolph and Fleener. I think I upgraded with Thomas. I thought it was a fair trade. That lineup might be nasty on paper but it ain't producing. I'm 3-3. Richardson isn't putting up that many points. Johnson always has injury issues and now a qb who is hurt. I picked up Harvin for later in the season.
Edit: And he wanted Nelson. Wasn't going to take anyone else
Edit: And he wanted Nelson. Wasn't going to take anyone else
This post was edited on 10/17/13 at 12:34 pm
Posted on 10/17/13 at 12:35 pm to Sader1990
quote:
I wasn't happy with Richardson
Understandable but McFadden is not an upgrade over Trich IMO
quote:
I think I upgraded with Thomas.
You did upgrade here but you took a hit at WR
quote:
I thought it was a fair trade
It is.
Just giving you some options.
While overall you upgraded at TE, You downgraded at RB and WR and now you are on the trade market again for RB and WR.
While I know you are thinking of trading Johnson. He has the most receptions At the WR position right now.
You could maybe try and swing a trade like Johnson/mcfadden for fitz/bernard if you are looking for TD production. But I would stick with your guys.
This post was edited on 10/17/13 at 12:49 pm
Posted on 10/17/13 at 12:44 pm to Bhodges
I'm happy with my rbs. I just really want lacy. And the guy that has him is in the bottom half of the league so I think I might be able to get him to bite on a trade more favorable to me. I just picked up Randel for a spot start this week so I'll probably sit Powell. WR are slim pickens in my league cause we play 3. I didn't wanna give it Nelson but I think Sanders will be decent because I believe the steelers will start opening it up more. Then I'll will have Harvin in a week or two.
Posted on 10/17/13 at 12:47 pm to Sader1990
quote:
I just really want lacy.
Well try Lacy for Mcfadden and see what happens.
Posted on 10/17/13 at 12:50 pm to Bhodges
That's what I'm going to do. Even though A. Johnson has the most catches it doesn't help me because my league isn't PPR.
Posted on 10/17/13 at 12:53 pm to Sader1990
Eric Upper Decker is who you want
Page 1 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News