Tahj Mahal | TigerDroppings.com

Posted byMessage
lwest41
Belmont Fan
Member since Aug 2009
130 posts

Tahj Mahal


Why isn't he a factor at linebacker?






Back to top
Share:
LsuTool
Columbia Fan
Suck that tiger Tool, B
Member since Oct 2009
22758 posts
 Online 

re: Tahj Mahal


who





Back to top
  Replies (0)
Ignignot
LSU Fan
DooDoo Rooneys
Member since Mar 2009
11601 posts

re: Tahj Mahal


2/10





Back to top
  Replies (0)
Reda LSU
Southern Cal Fan
Connecticut
Member since Jan 2013
2470 posts

re: Tahj Mahal


because he weighs 205 lbs if that





Back to top
  Replies (0)
Bottom9
LSU Fan
In Jarvis Landry we trust!
Member since Jul 2010
5185 posts

re: Tahj Mahal


because he sucks





Back to top
  Replies (0)
FalseProphet
LSU Fan
Funroe
Member since Dec 2011
6204 posts

re: Tahj Mahal


Did you try to give Tahj Jones a bad nickname?





Back to top
ForeverLSU02
Penn Fan
Albany
Member since Jun 2007
28061 posts

re: Tahj Mahal


quote:

Did you try to give Tahj Jones a bad nickname?
No, he actually did






Back to top
  Replies (0)
ATLTiger
#TreyBiletnikoffs
Member since Sep 2003
35046 posts

re: Tahj Mahal


he's been hurt all yr it seems. it'd be interesting to have him out there fully healthy. one thing about Tahj, or at least old Tahj, was that he tackled well.

hate to see anyone hurt, but it does give Kwon more snaps.






Back to top
  Replies (0)
dgnx6
LSU Fan
Baton Rouge
Member since Feb 2006
19894 posts

re: Tahj Mahal


hes injured. he hasnt played. And only kwon has been a factor really, even he has trouble shedding blocks at times.





Back to top
  Replies (0)
Sev09
LSU Fan
Brandon Harris Fan Club, Founder
Member since Feb 2011
7425 posts

re: Tahj Mahal


quote:

Tahj Mahal


Clever.






Back to top
  Replies (0)
KG5989
New Orleans Saints Fan
Das Boot
Member since Oct 2010
9117 posts
 Online 

re: Tahj Mahal


Hes in his 5th season and has never been a factor. Always gets passed up by better younger LBs.

And Kwon is our best player on D this year. Cant sit him for Kwon.






Back to top
  Replies (0)


Back to top