Started By
Message
locked post

Cruz + Bernard for Lacy + Amendola

Posted on 10/8/13 at 6:48 pm
Posted by LSUSOBEAST1
Member since Aug 2008
28614 posts
Posted on 10/8/13 at 6:48 pm
His team is in rough shape and Lacy and Amendola would both start for him. Cruz would obviously start for me and Bernard would be an occasional flex play with keeper value next season. I obviously like what it would do to my WRs, but I am very worried about my RBs. I've been trying to trade for a #2 RB for a couple weeks now and nobody will bite. I'm in 1st in our 10-team regular scoring league. Thoughts? My team:

Posted by castorinho
13623 posts
Member since Nov 2010
82010 posts
Posted on 10/8/13 at 7:06 pm to
This trade does nothing to address your need, stick with Lacy. You don't need Cruz you're stacked at WR.
I'm not sure I even follow you here.
Posted by LSUSOBEAST1
Member since Aug 2008
28614 posts
Posted on 10/8/13 at 7:19 pm to
The trade was offered to me. I'm just considering it. Having the #1, 2 and 3 scoring WRs on my team would be sick. I'm wondering if that would be enough to justify having a #3 RB in my #2 spot. Does that make sense?
Posted by LSUSOBEAST1
Member since Aug 2008
28614 posts
Posted on 10/8/13 at 7:40 pm to
bump
Posted by castorinho
13623 posts
Member since Nov 2010
82010 posts
Posted on 10/8/13 at 9:58 pm to
Ok I understand but I think you should keep your team as is, if Sunday was any indication and the packers keep committing to the run I think Lacy will become a solid #2.

Hopefully other people chime in with different views
Posted by robbykidd
Tulsa
Member since May 2011
1379 posts
Posted on 10/8/13 at 10:16 pm to
I like lacy as a top 10 type back moving forward. I would stay with what you have.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram