- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
NFL Execs: Murray vs Mettenberger...better pro prospect
Posted on 9/25/13 at 10:52 am
Posted on 9/25/13 at 10:52 am
quote:
There is still plenty of time for these executives to change their minds, but it seems like Mettenberger has a pretty decisive advantage at the moment.
LINK
8
Posted on 9/25/13 at 10:52 am to lsuhunt555
Game over 
Posted on 9/25/13 at 10:53 am to lsuhunt555
quote:
There is still plenty of time for these executives to change their minds, but it seems like Mettenberger has a pretty decisive advantage at the moment.
F'n A Cotton!
Posted on 9/25/13 at 10:53 am to lsuhunt555
Mett's the single reason why I think we're going to win this game. He's the better QB right now, without a doubt.
Posted on 9/25/13 at 10:54 am to lsuhunt555
I am just hoping he can control his emotions to help him this week not start pressing.
Posted on 9/25/13 at 10:54 am to ForeverLSU02
Please post this on the SECR.
Posted on 9/25/13 at 10:56 am to ForeverLSU02
Clearly. Mett has the size and arm. Murray is a Colt McCoy 2.0
Posted on 9/25/13 at 11:00 am to Tigah32
I liked the one who said he wouldn't take either of them.
Posted on 9/25/13 at 11:04 am to lsuhunt555
Posted on 9/25/13 at 11:05 am to Tigah32
quote:
Murray is a Colt McCoy 2.0
:kige:
Posted on 9/25/13 at 11:06 am to guttata
quote:
I liked the one who said he wouldn't take either of them.
Quite honestly, for the pros, I wouldn't either. AM has proven to have a choke factor, and the sample size is too small for ZM to trust. But if you held a gun to my head and say pick one, it's ZM, easily.
This post was edited on 9/25/13 at 11:07 am
Posted on 9/25/13 at 11:07 am to guttata
quote:
I liked the one who said he wouldn't take either of them.
Of course you would. You are the quintessential negatiger. If LSU had the #1 recruiting class you would bitch about the guys they didn't get.
Posted on 9/25/13 at 11:08 am to Goldrush25
quote:
the sample size is too small for ZM to trust.
True, but theyre probably not talking about 1st rounders. I could see Mett being a 3-4 round pick, which would be great for value for the possible upside.
Posted on 9/25/13 at 11:14 am to lsuhunt555
There's absolutely no comparison regarding physical tools. Mett just needed to understand the position, which finally seems to be working.
Posted on 9/25/13 at 11:17 am to lsuhunt555
quote:
he's athletic inside the pocket
Posted on 9/25/13 at 11:24 am to TheWalrus
I imagine we'll see a few balls sail on Mett early on, then he'll settle down. Wouldn't be surprised if the first play was the quick wide receiver pass.
Posted on 9/25/13 at 11:28 am to Alatgr
I thought the same thing. I love Mett, but he shouldn't be in the same sentence as the word "athletic"
Posted on 9/25/13 at 11:56 am to onmymedicalgrind
I am not a fan of Mett as a high draft pick because it appears both IQ and athletic ability is limited. A smart QB can overcome lack of athleticism. An athletic QB can survive less than impressive brain power. Lack both? Could be proven wrong. we'll see ....
...but seriously, some people here are talking Heisman. Methamphetamine = Heisman? I guess it has been so long since LSU had a quarterback that the fans think anyone who can throw a ball must be one.
sorry, but this…
[URL=LINK ]
… usually equals this…
[URL=LINK ]
[URL=LINK ]
[URL=LINK ]
...but seriously, some people here are talking Heisman. Methamphetamine = Heisman? I guess it has been so long since LSU had a quarterback that the fans think anyone who can throw a ball must be one.
sorry, but this…
[URL=LINK ]
… usually equals this…
[URL=LINK ]
[URL=LINK ]
[URL=LINK ]
This post was edited on 9/25/13 at 12:02 pm
Posted on 9/25/13 at 12:00 pm to onmymedicalgrind
quote:
I thought the same thing. I love Mett, but he shouldn't be in the same sentence as the word "athletic"
Mett's footwork has improved considerably, and is the single biggest factor in his improvement IMO. He might have been a statue last year, but so far this year he's shown he can move in the pocket and has made some pretty athletic plays avoiding the rush and delivering a nice throw on target.
Posted on 9/25/13 at 12:05 pm to lsuhunt555
Why even play the game? We've already won
Page 1 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News