Started By
Message
locked post

Is Micah Eugene = Danny McCray 2.0?

Posted on 9/24/13 at 11:06 am
Posted by EnoughAlready
gumpland
Member since Sep 2010
101 posts
Posted on 9/24/13 at 11:06 am
Solid in run support. Liability in pass game. Gave me that recollection watching the receivers run past him Saturday.
Posted by SwampManiac
Quito, Ecuador
Member since Jul 2013
1758 posts
Posted on 9/24/13 at 11:07 am to
No!
Posted by Drew Orleans
Member since Mar 2010
21577 posts
Posted on 9/24/13 at 11:07 am to
God, even if that comparison is spot on, I hate you for making it...
Posted by Dizz
Member since May 2008
14718 posts
Posted on 9/24/13 at 11:07 am to
Danny McCray Arkansans 2007, makes me want to smash my computer.
This post was edited on 9/24/13 at 11:08 am
Posted by Ash Williams
South of i-10
Member since May 2009
18144 posts
Posted on 9/24/13 at 11:10 am to
quote:

EnoughAlready

Posted by UnAnon
Breaux Bridge
Member since Sep 2013
6433 posts
Posted on 9/24/13 at 11:10 am to
Micah Eugene is a freak athlete. Still learning the system, still has time to improve in coverage. Will be in the NFL.
Posted by SportTiger1
Stonewall, LA
Member since Feb 2007
28499 posts
Posted on 9/24/13 at 11:11 am to
quote:

Solid in run support. Liability in pass game. Gave me that recollection watching the receivers run past him Saturday.


After rewatching the game last night, I think this is a fair comparison...unfortunately. Can not play the ball in the air at all.
Posted by Lester Earl
Member since Nov 2003
278083 posts
Posted on 9/24/13 at 11:18 am to
quote:

Micah Eugene is a freak athlete



ha, no he's not
Posted by Mr. Wayne
Member since Feb 2008
10047 posts
Posted on 9/24/13 at 11:20 am to
quote:

Can not play the ball in the air at all


This. He seems to be in the right place, but has zero ball awareness. Which is pretty important at Safety.
Posted by deSandman
Member since Mar 2007
969 posts
Posted on 9/24/13 at 11:25 am to
I actually think they are pretty different, Eugene has seemed pretty good playing nickle, even in coverage, but really struggled with deep help as a safety, whereas I always thought McCray was decent when playing safety, his problems were when lined up in nickle and used as an extra cornerback.
Posted by jscrims
Lost
Member since May 2008
3545 posts
Posted on 9/24/13 at 11:27 am to
Is that a bad thing? Last I saw, NFL scouts and teams had him playing well enough in college to have him play in the NFL. Pretty sure he is still there, collecting a game check and getting significant PT.
Posted by mkibod1
South of the Donna Dixon Line
Member since Jan 2011
4744 posts
Posted on 9/24/13 at 11:28 am to
I just love how he stands flat footed as the receiver approaches him then turns to run after giving the wideout a head start and letting him run by... It's like he reads curl/dig ALL the time. A simple double move burns him.
This post was edited on 9/24/13 at 11:30 am
Posted by therick711
South
Member since Jan 2008
25056 posts
Posted on 9/24/13 at 11:32 am to
quote:

Last I saw, NFL scouts and teams had him playing well enough in college to have him play in the NFL. Pretty sure he is still there, collecting a game check and getting significant PT.



Glad to see the scouts got him playing well.

LINK

That's cold blooded analysis right there.
Posted by Lester Earl
Member since Nov 2003
278083 posts
Posted on 9/24/13 at 11:32 am to
he's pretty much just a special teams player, but yes, he has made it further than most people expected
Posted by therick711
South
Member since Jan 2008
25056 posts
Posted on 9/24/13 at 11:34 am to
quote:

he's pretty much just a special teams player, but yes, he has made it further than most people expected


The man was and is an excellent kick/punt coverage guy. He is a classic tweener that in his career is good enough to be in the frame for you to definitively know whose fault a big play was. It isn't funny, and I take no joy in that analysis. If he was a bit bigger, we'd be talking about how he was an incredible linebacker, I believe.
Posted by Lester Earl
Member since Nov 2003
278083 posts
Posted on 9/24/13 at 11:35 am to
I thought he should have always played LB

he was great at playing the ball in front of him. Just couldnt turn and run well
Posted by clamdip
Rocky Mountain High
Member since Sep 2004
17857 posts
Posted on 9/24/13 at 11:35 am to
y'all stop being tough on Micah for those 2 long passes. There is a reason AU had success in the 2nd half with those. Actually two reasons:

1. they were getting 5-6 yards a pop running the ball. both our safeties were cheating up.

2. the throws were perfectly accurate.

I think Malzahn saw the safeties and thought the time was right. Eugene was a step slow to get out for the over coverage on the WR. That's nothing new or particular to Eugene when a team is pounding us with the running game.

Now, if he's toasted a couple more times Saturday then I'll start to worry. But, even then, who here thinks our safeties won't be cheating up on Gurley-man?
This post was edited on 9/24/13 at 11:37 am
Posted by therick711
South
Member since Jan 2008
25056 posts
Posted on 9/24/13 at 11:38 am to
quote:

I thought he should have always played LB


Again, the tweener thing. He struggled to shed blocks. The traffic he would have had to play in at that size would have killed his productivity. He needed to be a little taller and faster or a bit heavier and stronger. Guy has stones, though. Just not the complete tool set.

You can live with a guy who makes the most out of what he has. What always drove me mad was how this guy wasn't a monster.

LINK

You could strike a match off of him, prototypical size and strength, couldn't play a lick. Bizarre.
Posted by omegaman66
greenwell springs
Member since Oct 2007
22767 posts
Posted on 9/24/13 at 11:38 am to
Nope McCray has used up all his eligibility and has not changed his name. This is how rumors start. Please stop.
Posted by MetArl15
Washington, DC
Member since Apr 2007
9466 posts
Posted on 9/24/13 at 11:38 am to
Need another S to emerge opposite Loston so Eugene can stay in the Nickel role. He is poor in coverage and doesn't have the elite speed or ball awareness to excel as a starting SEC safety. He is however an excellent tackler and is quite adept in the nickel role against TEs/RBs in the middle of the field and defending running plays out of the spread. Regardless of where he lines up, he is an essential cog in having a solid defense this year, but he seems to add more as a 5th DB rather than a base D starter.

just my two cents.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram