- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Hopkins and L. Miller for Julio - Should I veto?
Posted on 9/22/13 at 6:49 pm
Posted on 9/22/13 at 6:49 pm
Trade doesn't involve me. Am I the only one who thinks the trade is a little one sided?
Team 1 trades Deandre Hopkins and Lamar Miller for Julio Jones. 12 man standard.
Current teams:
Team 1:
Moreno
Doug Martin
Reggie Bush
Lamar Miller
Giovani Bernard
Roddy White
Heath Miller
Britt
Steve Smith
Royal
Hopkins
Team 2:
Chris Johnson
Ray Rice
Hillman
Jonathan Stewart
Julio Jones
Cecil Shorts
Jordy Nelson
James Jones
Michael Floyd
Team 1 trades Deandre Hopkins and Lamar Miller for Julio Jones. 12 man standard.
Current teams:
Team 1:
Moreno
Doug Martin
Reggie Bush
Lamar Miller
Giovani Bernard
Roddy White
Heath Miller
Britt
Steve Smith
Royal
Hopkins
Team 2:
Chris Johnson
Ray Rice
Hillman
Jonathan Stewart
Julio Jones
Cecil Shorts
Jordy Nelson
James Jones
Michael Floyd
This post was edited on 9/22/13 at 7:30 pm
4
Posted on 9/22/13 at 7:23 pm to VOLhalla
One time selfish bump. No thoughts?
Posted on 9/22/13 at 7:24 pm to VOLhalla
nobody is giving up julio for them at this point dude
Posted on 9/22/13 at 7:25 pm to VOLhalla
only an idiot would give up julio for that garbage
Posted on 9/22/13 at 7:25 pm to St Augustine
It isn't a hypothetical. It actually happened today between two other teams. I've never voted for a veto before but I'm close
Posted on 9/22/13 at 7:34 pm to VOLhalla
Veto that shite. Anything that makes the other teams better you should naturally be against
Posted on 9/22/13 at 7:37 pm to VOLhalla
It's lopsided but not collusive imo.
Posted on 9/22/13 at 7:38 pm to NOLAbaby
It's the first time in three years anyone has mentioned voting on a veto. I'm leaning towards agreeing. I just don't understand what team 2 is thinking
Posted on 9/22/13 at 7:51 pm to VOLhalla
quote:
It's the first time in three years anyone has mentioned voting on a veto. I'm leaning towards agreeing. I just don't understand what team 2 is thinking
Ask what he's thinking to make sure its not collusion. Make him tell you why he's getting better. If it sounds like he believes he's getting better thand don't VETO, if its collusion than VETO it and cut his balls off.
Posted on 9/22/13 at 8:42 pm to CM84
quote:
It's the first time in three years anyone has mentioned voting on a veto. I'm leaning towards agreeing. I just don't understand what team 2 is thinking
I could not disagree more with this. I've gotten in to arguments on here about this before, but...
It is every league member's job to make the league competitive and fair. One team should not benefit exorbitantly from another's ignorance/stupidity. It is simply not fair to the other 10 people who may lose to the ridiculously stacked team.
Who wrote in this non-existent fantasy rulebook that vetoing is only for collusion? If the majority of the league disagrees with it, then that says it all.
Veto on, my brother.
Posted on 9/22/13 at 10:16 pm to VOLhalla
Don't veto. Lamar Miller could come on.
Posted on 9/22/13 at 10:51 pm to VOLhalla
I would veto if that were in my league.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News