- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
My Updated Ranking System After Week 3
Posted on 9/16/13 at 8:36 am
Posted on 9/16/13 at 8:36 am
Came up with the idea back in April. Here's how it's playing out.
(Open in a new tab to see the bigger picture)
1. Alabama
2. Ole Miss
3. Michigan
4. Miami (Fl)
5. Clemson
6. UCF
7. UCLA
8. Texas Tech
9. LSU
10. Georgia
11. Oklahoma St.
12. Oklahoma
13. Washington
14. Arizona St.
15. Ohio St.
16. Northwestern
17. Louisville
18. Auburn
19. Florida St.
20. Arizona
21. Oregon
22. Arkansas
22. Georgia Tech
24. Maryland
25. NC St.
25. South Carolina
(Open in a new tab to see the bigger picture)
1. Alabama
2. Ole Miss
3. Michigan
4. Miami (Fl)
5. Clemson
6. UCF
7. UCLA
8. Texas Tech
9. LSU
10. Georgia
11. Oklahoma St.
12. Oklahoma
13. Washington
14. Arizona St.
15. Ohio St.
16. Northwestern
17. Louisville
18. Auburn
19. Florida St.
20. Arizona
21. Oregon
22. Arkansas
22. Georgia Tech
24. Maryland
25. NC St.
25. South Carolina
Posted on 9/16/13 at 8:39 am to Harry Caray
You and SpidermanTuba should collaborate.
Posted on 9/16/13 at 8:45 am to Harry Caray
quote:
25. NC St.
LOOOOOL
Posted on 9/16/13 at 8:56 am to Harry Caray
quote:
2. Ole Miss
3. Michigan
quote:
6. UCF
7. UCLA
8. Texas Tech
quote:
13. Washington
14. Arizona St.
15. Ohio St.
quote:
20. Arizona
21. Oregon
These were especially lulz worthy
Posted on 9/16/13 at 9:06 am to WG_Dawg
Yeah, everything will be a bit screwy with such a small sample size and so many undefeated teams. I'm expecting it to even out to something very realistic around week 6-8
This post was edited on 9/16/13 at 9:07 am
Posted on 9/16/13 at 9:15 am to Harry Caray
Why wouldnt you make a system that changes accordingly based on sample size so it isnt a joke at the beginning of the season?
Never understood this with some of the formulas out there
Never understood this with some of the formulas out there
This post was edited on 9/16/13 at 9:16 am
Posted on 9/16/13 at 9:19 am to DollaChoppa
You sound very stupid.
For a system that doesn't have eyes, these rankings are ok for week 2.
tuba's rankings on the other hand...
For a system that doesn't have eyes, these rankings are ok for week 2.
tuba's rankings on the other hand...
Posted on 9/16/13 at 9:31 am to castorinho
Uh, suggesting a dynamic formula that changes based on sample size so you dont get UCF as the #6 team in the country makes me sound very stupid?
Well alright then
Well alright then
Posted on 9/16/13 at 9:32 am to DollaChoppa
Changes accordingly based on sample size? I'd still have the same rankings but with less space between teams...unless you have any ideas of how to do so to get teams that've played bullshite games in.
Posted on 9/16/13 at 9:38 am to DollaChoppa
Is UCF's ranking really that absurd? They are (3-0) with two of those being away wins, one of those away wins against Penn State. Apply that to any "BCS" team, and a #6 ranking would make sense. Perception means nothing in this formula.
Posted on 9/16/13 at 9:51 am to Harry Caray
You aren't even reading your own system right. Ole Miss is #17. They are ranked at the top of tier 2. UCF is ranked 31.
Posted on 9/16/13 at 9:53 am to JG77056
Look at their points. The pod system is simply a guide of how strong an opponent is, not the ranking itself.
Posted on 9/16/13 at 9:54 am to Harry Caray
So A&M is one of the lowest ranked teams in the country?
Posted on 9/16/13 at 10:28 am to JG77056
46th, yes. Two home wins against rice and Sam Houston state are not impressive.
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News