Our offense still needs the guy that can stretch field vertical | TigerDroppings.com

Posted byMessage
Chad504boy
New Orleans Saints Fan
Five Oh Four
Member since Feb 2005
84103 posts

Our offense still needs the guy that can stretch field vertical



Hopefully meachem can return to meachem form. Stills is not a vertical guy, we miss Morgan's talent bad.


We must get ball to graham more too







Back to top
Share:
Mouth
New Orleans Saints Fan
Member since Jan 2008
14306 posts

re: Our offense still needs the guy that can stretch field vertical


quote:

Stills is not a vertical guy


Humbra? He looks pretty damn vertical to me.






Back to top
Slapouttiger
LSU Fan
alabama
Member since Jun 2011
2563 posts

re: Our offense still needs the guy that can stretch field vertical


He can't be too fast. Drew will under throw him





Back to top
  Replies (0)
Chad504boy
New Orleans Saints Fan
Five Oh Four
Member since Feb 2005
84103 posts

re: Our offense still needs the guy that can stretch field vertical


He's not a burner, he's our only option now but he's not pulling away from DBs by speed. He's an upgrade to Moore speed wise





Back to top
Brettesaurus Rex
New Orleans Saints Fan
Baton Rouge
Member since Dec 2009
24581 posts

re: Our offense still needs the guy that can stretch field vertical


quote:

Stills is not a vertical guy

I disagree. I think he can be, but no ones biting on playaction off of a nonexistent run game.






Back to top
goatmilker
LSU Fan
2014 drunkin Bobby award winner!
Member since Feb 2009
17952 posts

re: Our offense still needs the guy that can stretch field vertical


Yea.
It was a TD to Stills that drew under threw.
Stills also was open on another that Brees missed him on.
Also Babs was in Brees face all game and the birds knew to bring the pressure up the middle which I thought they did very well.

I'll wait 1-2 more games before putting out the call for a deep threat.






Back to top
Chad504boy
New Orleans Saints Fan
Five Oh Four
Member since Feb 2005
84103 posts

re: Our offense still needs the guy that can stretch field vertical


This isn't a knock on stills cause I love the kid, he just doesn't haven't gain speed, doesn't mean he won't be productive in our O though.





Back to top
Neauxla
New Orleans Saints Fan
New Orleans
Member since Feb 2008
29900 posts

re: Our offense still needs the guy that can stretch field vertical


We don't know if he has the speed b/c the 2 times he tried, Drew underthrew him.





Back to top
s-man
New Orleans Saints Fan
Benton
Member since Jan 2005
708 posts

re: Our offense still needs the guy that can stretch field vertical


You think Meach is faster at this point?





Back to top
SuperSoakher
New Orleans Saints Fan
Member since Jun 2012
2767 posts

re: Our offense still needs the guy that can stretch field vertical


Ingram can do it





Back to top
Chad504boy
New Orleans Saints Fan
Five Oh Four
Member since Feb 2005
84103 posts

re: Our offense still needs the guy that can stretch field vertical


No idea bout meachem, just hoping. I think he was signed to TRY to be vertical threat. Stills speed isn't enough to keep that extra safety honest





Back to top
  Replies (0)
goatmilker
LSU Fan
2014 drunkin Bobby award winner!
Member since Feb 2009
17952 posts

re: Our offense still needs the guy that can stretch field vertical


I don't know his speed yet either. Its one game and drew under threw him. Which would lead some to say he has too much

One game. I'm not saying yea or nay yet...but why are you Chad?






Back to top
Kcrad
LSU Fan
Slidell
Member since Nov 2010
14479 posts

re: Our offense still needs the guy that can stretch field vertical


It looks like Stills doesn't have that extra gear, but we'll see. It's only week 1.

As for Drew, he has never had a rocket for an arm. He just needs a little more timing and protection for those long throws.






Back to top
Chad504boy
New Orleans Saints Fan
Five Oh Four
Member since Feb 2005
84103 posts

re: Our offense still needs the guy that can stretch field vertical


We'll see, he does have a better 40 time than what I thought





Back to top
lsutigers1992
New Orleans Saints Fan
Member since Mar 2006
12029 posts

re: Our offense still needs the guy that can stretch field vertical


Nobody is asking why we don't trade Mark Ingram for Mike Wallace?





Back to top
Melvin
New Orleans Saints Fan
Covington
Member since Apr 2011
13314 posts

re: Our offense still needs the guy that can stretch field vertical


Stills had his guy beat (not by much, granted) on both deep throws and if Drew would have put it out there a little more he would have had it IMO





Back to top
  Replies (0)
htran90
New Orleans Saints Fan
belle chasse
Member since Dec 2012
6659 posts
 Online 

re: Our offense still needs the guy that can stretch field vertical


what I'm thinking:

1. stills needs to develop that last gear that most receivers get with due time and conditioning (you can tell that dude was worn out)

2. stills and brees aren't in sync yet and stills is faster than brees anticipates which leads to underthrown passes.

2 is something I hope is true and not that brees is losing arm strength






Back to top
  Replies (0)
Kcrad
LSU Fan
Slidell
Member since Nov 2010
14479 posts

re: Our offense still needs the guy that can stretch field vertical


quote:

Nobody is asking why we don't trade Mark Ingram for Mike Wallace?



How do you get that from what I posted?






Back to top
LSUFreek
LSU Fan
Greater New Orleans
Member since Jan 2007
7960 posts

re: Our offense still needs the guy that can stretch field vertical


Drew threw 4 deep passes to Stills.

3 were under-thrown when Stills had a step on his defender.

1 was caught.

I think Brees needs to place the deep ball more accurately than than it is necessary to replace Stills as a deep threat.






Back to top
BRgetthenet
LSU Fan
Golf Board Smash Lab™ CEO
Member since Oct 2011
66246 posts

re: Our offense still needs the guy that can stretch field vertical


quote:

Brees needs to place the deep ball more accurately than than it is necessary to replace Stills as a deep threat


This is the correct answer.






Back to top


Back to top