- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Cabin in the Woods (spoilers)
Posted on 8/5/13 at 10:23 am
Posted on 8/5/13 at 10:23 am
<If you don't want a spoiler then you should go home...we got this n that and 69 and.....>
ok, i don't do what's known as see movies in a "timely" fashion.
but i finally saw this when i was home sick on friday.
what was the consensus about the ending?
loved the concept and the fresh take on the genre but i basically mean the very end. i guess at that point all hell had broken loose (quite literally) but i really thought she woulda shot the "fool" and tried to salvage the world.
i loved almost all of movie especially when i went back and watched the betting scene and cellar scene again, but just the very end. i guess once everything was loose they painted themselves into a corner and had to just end it all. i can't tell if the movie ending left me wanting more or disappointed. i still can't tell.
thoughts? theories? general insults directed at members of my family??
btw bradley whitford is awesome.
edit: also i did a search and nothing came up probably because it came out so long ago relatively speaking
ok, i don't do what's known as see movies in a "timely" fashion.
but i finally saw this when i was home sick on friday.
what was the consensus about the ending?
loved the concept and the fresh take on the genre but i basically mean the very end. i guess at that point all hell had broken loose (quite literally) but i really thought she woulda shot the "fool" and tried to salvage the world.
i loved almost all of movie especially when i went back and watched the betting scene and cellar scene again, but just the very end. i guess once everything was loose they painted themselves into a corner and had to just end it all. i can't tell if the movie ending left me wanting more or disappointed. i still can't tell.
thoughts? theories? general insults directed at members of my family??
btw bradley whitford is awesome.
edit: also i did a search and nothing came up probably because it came out so long ago relatively speaking
This post was edited on 8/5/13 at 10:25 am
Posted on 8/5/13 at 10:26 am to TDTGodfather
I think it fit their characters as a bunch of selfish twits. Even faced with the prospect of all human life being eradicated, they won't make a sacrifice for the greater good. I kind of loved that. They had been through so much, so it was just like, "hey, screw everyone in existence."
You do realize the audience are the gods who are destroying the universe at the very end? The universe "dies" because the movie ends and there will be no sequel. They literally ended their existence when the movie ended.
You do realize the audience are the gods who are destroying the universe at the very end? The universe "dies" because the movie ends and there will be no sequel. They literally ended their existence when the movie ended.
Posted on 8/5/13 at 10:30 am to TDTGodfather
quote:
what was the consensus about the ending?
The whole thing was a "loving hate letter" from Joss Whedon to the horror movie genre. The gods at the end are movie-going audiences who are tired of the same old cliche' horror movies and plots.
Great, great film and easily one of my favorites from 2012.
MERMAN!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Posted on 8/5/13 at 10:31 am to Baloo
quote:
You do realize the audience are the gods who are destroying the universe at the very end? The universe "dies" because the movie ends and there will be no sequel. They literally ended their existence when the movie ended.
yeah i guess that's why i said wanting more. i wanted the movie to end with a shot like 2 months later everthing is normal and two new snarky guys walk into the room ready to do this again.
Posted on 8/5/13 at 10:32 am to Baloo
quote:
I think it fit their characters as a bunch of selfish twits. Even faced with the prospect of all human life being eradicated, they won't make a sacrifice for the greater good. I kind of loved that. They had been through so much, so it was just like, "hey, screw everyone in existence."
You do realize the audience are the gods who are destroying the universe at the very end? The universe "dies" because the movie ends and there will be no sequel. They literally ended their existence when the movie ended.
This.
But I think Kranz's line about starting over, "maybe someone else" was important as well. That was really a calling to creatives to "do something different," the genre.
Posted on 8/5/13 at 10:32 am to TDTGodfather
quote:
edit: also i did a search and nothing came up probably because it came out so long ago relatively speaking
apparently not...
LINK
Posted on 8/5/13 at 10:34 am to TigerTree
quote:
apparently not...
LINK
sorry site search.
google is my friend but he's got a new gf so i hardly see him anymore.
Posted on 8/5/13 at 10:34 am to TigerTree
Whedon:
Also, this is greatness:
quote:
On another level it's a serious critique of what we love and what we don't about horror movies. I love being scared. I love that mixture of thrill, of horror, that objectification/identification thing of wanting definitely for the people to be all right but at the same time hoping they’ll go somewhere dark and face something awful. The things that I don't like are kids acting like idiots, the devolution of the horror movie into torture porn and into a long series of sadistic comeuppances. Drew and I both felt that the pendulum had swung a little too far in that direction.[
Also, this is greatness:
Posted on 8/5/13 at 10:37 am to CocomoLSU
What I loved about the movie is that at first, I hated most of the characters and hated how cliche' they were. And then, a little while later, you realize that that was the whole point. And then it really starts getting fun/awesome.
Posted on 8/5/13 at 10:43 am to TDTGodfather
quote:
what was the consensus about the ending?
The whole movie was great.
It completely rips the general horror film viewing public a new a-hole for getting what they want and then complaining about it.
Posted on 8/5/13 at 10:52 am to CocomoLSU
quote:
What I loved about the movie is that at first, I hated most of the characters and hated how cliche' they were. And then, a little while later, you realize that that was the whole point. And then it really starts getting fun/awesome.
This.
Posted on 8/5/13 at 10:53 am to TDTGodfather
This movie was awesome. The criticism comes from ppl not getting what is going on. Or thinking it was one thing from the previews and having it change up mid movie. You either like all the plot twist in the movie, or you think it sucks. There really is no in between.
Posted on 8/5/13 at 11:04 am to lsutigerfan1976
Would love to see some prequels to this. They have plenty of material to work with.
Posted on 8/5/13 at 11:06 am to lsutigerfan1976
quote:
You either like all the plot twist in the movie, or you think it sucks. There really is no in between.
Agree with that, big time.
Posted on 8/5/13 at 11:08 am to TDTGodfather
I'm fine with the ending. If we were able to stop the old gods once before I am sure we can do it again once their lust for blood settles down.
Posted on 8/5/13 at 11:09 am to TDTGodfather
quote:
yeah i guess that's why i said wanting more. i wanted the movie to end with a shot like 2 months later everthing is normal and two new snarky guys walk into the room ready to do this again.
I don't think you got it. There is no 2 months later. Errbody dead.
Posted on 8/5/13 at 11:36 am to illuminatic
quote:I don't buy this for a second.
There is no 2 months later. Errbody dead.
Are you saying man 1000s of years ago could strike a deal with the old gods but we wouldn't be able to do it again today?
Seems to me like a deal could be struck after the initial violence. If such a small amount of blood could keep them silenced, I imagine after a few hours of rampaging they will take another protracted nap.
Posted on 8/5/13 at 12:01 pm to illuminatic
quote:
yeah i guess that's why i said wanting more. i wanted the movie to end with a shot like 2 months later everthing is normal and two new snarky guys walk into the room ready to do this again.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I don't think you got it. There is no 2 months later. Errbody dead.
no i got it, that's my small point of contention. i didn't want errbody to be dead, i wanted an open ending for more shite to go down.
but i get the metaphor and think it was executed brilliantly.
on that pic posted above i went back and paused and saw "unicorn" and went WTF???? so seeing the unicorn skewer someone later was bigger (for me) then the merman moment. that shite was awesome.
also, i think out of all the choices, "molesting tree" would be my least favorite.
Posted on 8/5/13 at 12:01 pm to TigerMyth36
quote:
I don't buy this for a second.
Are you saying man 1000s of years ago could strike a deal with the old gods but we wouldn't be able to do it again today?
You, me, illuminatic.. your parents.. are all the "old gods" ... when did you strike a deal with man 1000s of years ago?
Posted on 8/5/13 at 12:02 pm to TDTGodfather
quote:
no i got it, that's my small point of contention. i didn't want errbody to be dead, i wanted an open ending for more shite to go down.
but i get the metaphor and think it was executed brilliantly.
if wheddon made Cabin in the Woods 2 - it could happen simply because of the fact that you are back in the movie theater watching the next movie.. which would mean, you made another pact with the horror film industry to watch the cliche drivel again.. sequel created.
This post was edited on 8/5/13 at 12:03 pm
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News