Zimmerman (Trayvons!) trial discussion thread. NOT GUILTY! Surprised? | Page 30 | TigerDroppings.com

Posted byMessage
MrFreakinMiyagi
Stetson Fan
Tampa Bay
Member since Feb 2007
12898 posts
 Online 

re: Zimmerman (Trayvons!) trial discussion thread. NOT GUILTY! Surprised?


quote:

Witness signed or liked a petition to prosecute GZ? Being addresses right now.

Damn

Was it an eye witness?







Back to top
MrFreakinMiyagi
Stetson Fan
Tampa Bay
Member since Feb 2007
12898 posts
 Online 

re: Zimmerman (Trayvons!) trial discussion thread. NOT GUILTY! Surprised?


quote:

finally you put "feel" or "opinion." You were passing the shite off as fact in this whole thread.

Actually, I put very similar wording in the prior post that you quoted.

But me saying that Trayvon would not have killed Zimm is a statement that implies opinion anyhow.






Back to top
  Replies (0)
RogerTheShrubber
LSU Fan
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
93331 posts
 Online 

re: Zimmerman (Trayvons!) trial discussion thread. NOT GUILTY! Surprised?


quote:

Since you have no clue what happened in that struggle


I know as much as you.


Correct. But I'm not the one making statements about what I would do.






Back to top
  Replies (0)
Guess
UNO Fan
Down The Road
Member since Jun 2009
2642 posts

re: Zimmerman (Trayvons!) trial discussion thread. NOT GUILTY! Surprised?


quote:

my point is that Zim didn't instigate Trayvon to attack him (if that's what happened) just by doing his job as a neighborhood watch or good Samaritan. 


Following someone in the middle of the night can definitely be perceived as aggression by a reasonable person(if Travon even attacked him first.)

And, my point is that Zimmerman could have easily avoided the situation simply by not trying to play hero.






Back to top
MikeBRLA
LSU Fan
Baton Rouge
Member since Jun 2005
9327 posts

re: Zimmerman (Trayvons!) trial discussion thread. NOT GUILTY! Surprised?


quote:

Burglary isn't a justifiable cause for homicide.


Castle doctrine. Look it up and educate yourself.






Back to top
MrFreakinMiyagi
Stetson Fan
Tampa Bay
Member since Feb 2007
12898 posts
 Online 

re: Zimmerman (Trayvons!) trial discussion thread. NOT GUILTY! Surprised?


quote:

Please keep this fricking huge reach bull shite out of here.


Don't be an ass.






Back to top
USMCTiger03
LSU Fan
Member since Sep 2007
64188 posts
 Online 

re: Zimmerman (Trayvons!) trial discussion thread. NOT GUILTY! Surprised?


Kind of an eye witness.





Back to top
  Replies (0)
USMCTiger03
LSU Fan
Member since Sep 2007
64188 posts
 Online 

re: Zimmerman (Trayvons!) trial discussion thread. NOT GUILTY! Surprised?


quote:

Don't be an ass.

Too easy, could not pass up.






Back to top
  Replies (0)
LSUWoodworker
LSU Fan
Popeyes Drive Thru
Member since Dec 2007
15185 posts

re: Zimmerman (Trayvons!) trial discussion thread. NOT GUILTY! Surprised?


Hung Jury most likely, no retrial.


No mass riots, too much time passed and free shite is easy to get anyway without the work of rioting.







Back to top
  Replies (0)
Guess
UNO Fan
Down The Road
Member since Jun 2009
2642 posts

re: Zimmerman (Trayvons!) trial discussion thread. NOT GUILTY! Surprised?


quote:

Castle doctrine. Look it up and educate yourself. 


Not a lawyer, but Zimmerman wasn't in his home or vehicle. Not to mention he was actually following Martin who wasn't threatening anyone's life or property, so how does Castle Doctrine apply? If anything Martin stood up to the guy who was stalking him and paid for that mistake with his life.






Back to top
CptBengal
USA Fan
BR Baby
Member since Dec 2007
40646 posts

re: Zimmerman (Trayvons!) trial discussion thread. NOT GUILTY! Surprised?


quote:

If anything Martin stood up to the guy who was stalking him and paid for that mistake with his life.


did you know I can legally follow you?

Did you know you dont have the right to beat the guy behind you on the street because he is following you?






Back to top
Guess
UNO Fan
Down The Road
Member since Jun 2009
2642 posts

re: Zimmerman (Trayvons!) trial discussion thread. NOT GUILTY! Surprised?


quote:

did you know I can legally follow you? 

Did you know you dont have the right to beat the guy behind you on the street because he is following you?


Is it reasonable to feel threatened by someone following you home in the middle of the night.

Did you know you dont have the right to just kill someone who is beating your arse after you get in a fight with him?






Back to top
RBWilliams8
LSU Fan
Member since Oct 2009
46691 posts

re: Zimmerman (Trayvons!) trial discussion thread. NOT GUILTY! Surprised?








Back to top
  Replies (0)
CptBengal
USA Fan
BR Baby
Member since Dec 2007
40646 posts

re: Zimmerman (Trayvons!) trial discussion thread. NOT GUILTY! Surprised?


quote:

Did you know you dont have the right to just kill someone who is beating your arse after you get in a fight with him?



actually if he is attacking you and you fear for your life.....you do.

I wonder if the races were reversed, would you still have this opinion?






Back to top
RogerTheShrubber
LSU Fan
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
93331 posts
 Online 

re: Zimmerman (Trayvons!) trial discussion thread. NOT GUILTY! Surprised?


quote:


And, my point is that Zimmerman could have easily avoided the situation


That point is pretty much understood by everyone. It appears both could have avoided the situation. Just bad judgement on the part of two people that resulted in the death of one.






Back to top
diddydirtyAubie
UCLA Fan
Bozeman
Member since Dec 2010
37536 posts

re: Zimmerman (Trayvons!) trial discussion thread. NOT GUILTY! Surprised?


Trayvon could have prevented dying if he had just called the cops about a guy stalking him instead of attacking the man.





Back to top
  Replies (0)
Guess
UNO Fan
Down The Road
Member since Jun 2009
2642 posts

re: Zimmerman (Trayvons!) trial discussion thread. NOT GUILTY! Surprised?


quote:

actually if he is attacking you and you fear for your life.....you do. I wonder if the races were reversed, would you still have this opinion?


And, it is very reasonable to feel threatened by someone following you in the middle of the night. All I'm saying is no matter how you look at it Zimmerman is at least part of the reason that a fight occurred, and you can't kill someone in a fight and just walk. My feelings wouldn't change if the races were reversed, but if they were, the black guy would be lucky to ever breath a free breath again.






Back to top
CptBengal
USA Fan
BR Baby
Member since Dec 2007
40646 posts

re: Zimmerman (Trayvons!) trial discussion thread. NOT GUILTY! Surprised?


quote:

and you can't kill someone in a fight and just walk.


yes you can. HAPPENS ALL THE TIME.







Back to top
Guess
UNO Fan
Down The Road
Member since Jun 2009
2642 posts

re: Zimmerman (Trayvons!) trial discussion thread. NOT GUILTY! Surprised?


quote:

That point is pretty much understood by everyone. It appears both could have avoided the situation. Just bad judgement on the part of two people that resulted in the death of one. 


Exactly which doesn't equal innocent of all blame. If you kill someone in a fight that you helped start, it's at least manslaughter.






Back to top
CptBengal
USA Fan
BR Baby
Member since Dec 2007
40646 posts

re: Zimmerman (Trayvons!) trial discussion thread. NOT GUILTY! Surprised?


quote:

it's at least manslaughter.


but he isnt charged with manslughter. He is charged with M2.






Back to top


Back to top