Started By
Message

re: Why haven't we gone after Charles woodson

Posted on 5/3/13 at 10:42 am to
Posted by Sophandros
Victoria Concordia Crescit
Member since Feb 2005
45218 posts
Posted on 5/3/13 at 10:42 am to
What evidence do you have to support your claim?

Your question is based on the assertion that we haven't pursued or even had discussions with Woodson...
Posted by Peazey
Metry
Member since Apr 2012
25418 posts
Posted on 5/3/13 at 11:52 am to
quote:

He's old.
While talented, he has slowed down the past two years.
He will want too much money.
He's not an upgrade of tremendous proportions over the combination of guys we can run out there if used properly. (Harper/IAQ/Vacarro/Jenkins)*


This is pretty much the situation. He isn't just getting old for a defensive back. He's been old, and now he is old as frick. There comes a time when every player has to retire. This is it for him.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 2Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram