Started By
Message
locked post

Analyzing Pelican Players and How to Fit Talents Together

Posted on 4/18/13 at 12:30 pm
Posted by corndeaux
Member since Sep 2009
9634 posts
Posted on 4/18/13 at 12:30 pm
Big summer for the Pels. Who to resign, who to draft, who to go after in FA? Where do they find the missing piece(s)? How do we make sense of the options that will work best for this team?

Tom Ziller and Bethleham Shoals were big on this idea of positional revolution. You can read about it here and here. They came up with a chart to depict a player's skill set and they called it the Z Graph:




The top row is traditional pg skillset and the bottom row is traditional c skillset. Most players will have linked skills (Lopez is only on the bottom, Vasquez is only the top), but a guy like Ryan Anderson is on both ends of the spectrum.

(If there is interest, the board could come to consensus on skills of players and perhaps someone with photoshop abilities could alter the chart for Pels players)

They also came up with a graph for how these skills overlap in a team context



This is from the 2010-2011 Heat, so it's outdated. But the idea is the same. Find a collection of players that cover all of the skills on the graph.

(Again, if there is interest, maybe some one with the photoshop know how could put it together?)

This is more of a blueprint than anything else. But it's a different way to think about building the team. This can help put context on where the team needs to focus on improving.
Posted by Fun Bunch
New Orleans
Member since May 2008
115415 posts
Posted on 4/18/13 at 12:35 pm to
I'm not going to lie. At first I looked at this and said: frick that. So goddamned complicated, I feel like its 15 years ago and I'm in a college math class.

But now I get it. Pretty cool tool.

And no I'm not doing it.
Posted by Jester
Baton Rouge
Member since Feb 2006
34245 posts
Posted on 4/18/13 at 12:38 pm to
quote:

Fit


I feel like z charts are a little quirky, but the idea is legit. Aminu filling the rebounding need is a perfect example from this year. What we need is more players with diverse skills.

However, as you can see, guys with lots of skills can make up for others with less than average skills.
Posted by Jester
Baton Rouge
Member since Feb 2006
34245 posts
Posted on 4/18/13 at 12:39 pm to
It probably wouldn't take much to create one for the 2012-2013 Hornets.
Posted by Fun Bunch
New Orleans
Member since May 2008
115415 posts
Posted on 4/18/13 at 12:40 pm to
quote:

as you can see, guys with lots of skills can make up for others with less than average skills.



Having Lebron James and Dwayne Wade probably helps.
Posted by GumBro Jackson
Raleigh
Member since Mar 2011
3112 posts
Posted on 4/18/13 at 12:46 pm to
Pretty cool. I like the idea. The only thing, I'm not sure about each player being all or nothing for each skill...you either have it or you don't...seems like maybe a rating per position would give a more complete picture.
Posted by Fun Bunch
New Orleans
Member since May 2008
115415 posts
Posted on 4/18/13 at 12:53 pm to
Vasquez: 3, Pa, Le, Fe, Rb
Gordon: 3, St, Pa, OD, Sc
Aminu: OD, Rb, ID, St
Davis: St, Le, Fe, OD, Md, %, ID, Rb, Bk
Lopez: Po, Rb, Po

I'm projecting on Davis because I think his Defense and Midrange game will improve greatly.

Agree at all with the list?
Posted by TigerinATL
Member since Feb 2005
61438 posts
Posted on 4/18/13 at 12:57 pm to
I understand the Periodic Table, but I'm a bit confused about the Airport Map. Is there a set number to aim for? Would Anderson be included even though he isn't a starter?
Posted by teke184
Zachary, LA
Member since Jan 2007
94834 posts
Posted on 4/18/13 at 12:58 pm to
quote:

Lopez: Po, Rb, Po


You have "post scoring" twice
Posted by teke184
Zachary, LA
Member since Jan 2007
94834 posts
Posted on 4/18/13 at 12:59 pm to
quote:

You don't really aim for a set number as much as try to keep from having 1s and 0s if possible.



You do this for each lineup you use to see what the best mix is.

That's why they replaced Chalmers and Anthony with Miller and Haslem in the second graph.
Posted by corndeaux
Member since Sep 2009
9634 posts
Posted on 4/18/13 at 1:07 pm to
quote:

Jester


quote:

I feel like z charts are a little quirky, but the idea is legit


Yeah. We can change them around if we want. Not gospel, just hopefully a conversation starter.

quote:

Vasquez: 3 (?), Pa, Le, Fe, Rb
Gordon: 3, St, Pa, OD, Sc
Aminu: OD, Rb, ID (?), St
Davis: St, Le, Fe, OD, Md, %, ID, Rb, Bk
Lopez: Po, Rb, Po Bk


Bold ones are the only things I would differ. Lopez and blocks is the only one I feel strongly about.

Anderson: 3, Sc, Md, %, Rb (only because of his offensive rebounding)

quote:

I'm projecting on Davis because I think his Defense and Midrange game will improve greatly.


In time, I really think Davis will only be missing the 3 skill. He won't ever be a high assist guy, but he's got the potential to be a good passer.
Posted by corndeaux
Member since Sep 2009
9634 posts
Posted on 4/18/13 at 1:10 pm to
quote:

Is there a set number to aim for?


I'm just making this up (edit- that is they don't state a particular #), but the more you have, the better your team will be. I think you can also look at it as a way to use that talent. If you did this for Houston, you would see lots of 3 and very little D. So using that talent to run and gun, like they have, makes sense.

quote:

Would Anderson be included even though he isn't a starter?


Yes. The second link has the explanation of this and includes other Miami units- with Miller and Haslem. So you could look at the Hornets best 5 and see how they stack up

This post was edited on 4/18/13 at 1:24 pm
Posted by Jester
Baton Rouge
Member since Feb 2006
34245 posts
Posted on 4/18/13 at 1:56 pm to
quote:

Vasquez: 3, Pa, Le, Fe, Rb
Gordon: 3, St, Pa, OD, Sc
Aminu: OD, Rb, ID, St
Davis: St, Le, Fe, OD, Md, %, ID, Rb, Bk
Lopez: Po, Rb, Po


Honestly, I think you could probably add Md to Vasquez and Lopez. He doesn't flash it often, but Lopez has a little range on the baseline. Also, you have to somehow credit Vasquez for his floaters, which I'd say are midrange.
Posted by Jester
Baton Rouge
Member since Feb 2006
34245 posts
Posted on 4/18/13 at 1:58 pm to
quote:

I understand the Periodic Table, but I'm a bit confused about the Airport Map. Is there a set number to aim for? Would Anderson be included even though he isn't a starter?


It's not about a single number. The idea is to minimize the zeros and ones in the center Z. The center Z is basically the sum of individual Zs. The idea is to fill every need as best as possible.

I think this could also be useful in trying to determine defensive rotations against different offensive schemes.
Posted by JohnZeroQ
Pelicans of Lafourche
Member since Jan 2012
8513 posts
Posted on 4/18/13 at 3:38 pm to
This graph blew my mind.

Good stuff
Posted by Jester
Baton Rouge
Member since Feb 2006
34245 posts
Posted on 5/29/13 at 2:36 pm to
Bump. I'd like to start profiling our current players, but it looks like a helluva task.
Posted by Gtothemoney
Da North Shore
Member since Sep 2012
17713 posts
Posted on 5/29/13 at 2:41 pm to
If we're quizzed on this, looks like I'll be cheating off someone.

Looks like the periodic table or something. Sheesh.
Posted by Jester
Baton Rouge
Member since Feb 2006
34245 posts
Posted on 5/29/13 at 3:16 pm to
First Unit

Vasquez: 3, Pa, Le, Fe, Rb, Md, BH
Gordon: 3, St, Pa, OD, BH
Aminu: OD, Rb, ID, St
Davis: Bk, ID, Rb, Md, %, OD, St, Le, Fe
Lopez: Bk, ID, PO, Md

Bench:

Roberts: Pa, 3, Fe, BH
Rivers: St, BH, OD
Miller: 3, OD, Md,
Anderson: 3, Md, Po, Rb
Smith: ID, Rb, Md


One major skill that is missing is handles. I feel like it's a more pertinent stat than "potent scoring" which should be already indicated in 3, MDd, and Po.

What does everyone else think about replacing "Sc" with "BH"?

Steals is another redundant category
Posted by Gtothemoney
Da North Shore
Member since Sep 2012
17713 posts
Posted on 5/29/13 at 3:54 pm to
OMG yes. Exactly what I was thinking.
Posted by corndeaux
Member since Sep 2009
9634 posts
Posted on 5/29/13 at 9:14 pm to
quote:

One major skill that is missing is handles. I feel like it's a more pertinent stat than "potent scoring" which should be already indicated in 3, MDd, and Po. 


I would add Caretaker- a guy that doesnt turn it over. And I would keep Potent Scorer. Youve got Lopez and Vasquez w/ 2 of 3 scoring picks each but neither one is a potent scorer. I interpret Potent Scorer as a high volume at least reasonable efficiency scorer- but thats just me.

edit- christ that sounded pompous.
This post was edited on 5/29/13 at 9:41 pm
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram