- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Avengers 2...Who should be the villian..........
Posted on 4/10/13 at 5:21 pm
Posted on 4/10/13 at 5:21 pm
Yea. I saw Thanos at the end of #1, but another
alien-Avengers battle so soon would be redundant.
A Thanos with infinity jems would be too much like Iron Man 3 and the Mandarin with his rings.
How about Kang the Conquerer or Ultron?
alien-Avengers battle so soon would be redundant.
A Thanos with infinity jems would be too much like Iron Man 3 and the Mandarin with his rings.
How about Kang the Conquerer or Ultron?
This post was edited on 4/10/13 at 5:33 pm
8
Posted on 4/10/13 at 5:22 pm to Rougarou4lsu
It'll be some guy I've never heard of. Loki wasn't a good villain in the crappy Thor movie so why was he the villain in the "epic" avengers movie?
Posted on 4/10/13 at 5:22 pm to Rougarou4lsu
quote:
Yea. I saw Thanos at the end of #1, but another alien-Avengers battle so soon would be redundant.
It doesn't matter, it's going to be Thanos.
Ultron would be nice but would need setup. Maybe for phase 3.
Posted on 4/10/13 at 5:23 pm to Murray
I think a well established and well known marvel villain is needed even if he is from another franchise
Posted on 4/10/13 at 5:25 pm to Broseph Barksdale
I swear to god I almost posted that, but onslaught murdered them all
Posted on 4/10/13 at 5:28 pm to DelU249
quote:
I think a well established and well known marvel villain is needed even if he is from another franchise
I don't mind Thanos but I'd love to see the Masters of Evil and then Ultron.
Posted on 4/10/13 at 5:41 pm to Rougarou4lsu
I'd say an Injustice League of sorts. Bring back a few of the villains in the past and have them come together to destroy the Avengers. Just continue to build up Thanos and make him a shadow in the background manipulating the Injustice Leage until the third one. Another alien invasion would just suck and be repetitive.
This post was edited on 4/10/13 at 5:43 pm
Posted on 4/10/13 at 5:49 pm to OMLandshark
quote:
I'd say an Injustice League of sorts. Bring back a few of the villains in the past and have them come together to destroy the Avengers
Exactly. Masters of Evil. I think you posted this before and got them stuck in my head as who I want to see.
Posted on 4/10/13 at 6:18 pm to Murray
Posted on 4/10/13 at 6:26 pm to Rougarou4lsu
quote:
A Thanos with infinity jems would be too much like Iron Man 3 and the Mandarin with his rings.
The Mandarin with 100 times the power of his rings wouldn't come close to matching the power of the Gauntlet.
Posted on 4/10/13 at 6:31 pm to Rougarou4lsu
quote:
Yea. I saw Thanos at the end of #1, but another
alien-Avengers battle so soon would be redundant.
It's not about redundancy....
Fury said, the Avengers are strictly about fighting the fights that they are not equipped to fight.
So they would only call on them when in dire need, and mostly, this will be something world threatening.
Although Ultron is a great villain and would do well for 3, he hasn't had enough setup time yet.
It's Thanos, no matter what.
Posted on 4/10/13 at 7:51 pm to Freauxzen
quote:
It's Thanos, no matter what.
I don't understand why he couldn't be the villain in the third film.
Posted on 4/10/13 at 7:58 pm to OMLandshark
They've already said they are laying out the Thanos story in Guardians, right before Avengers 2 comes out, and then proceeding with him going after Earth in the movie.
I would hope they don't stick with him through two films?
I would hope they don't stick with him through two films?
Posted on 4/10/13 at 8:05 pm to Freauxzen
I wouldn't mind seeing them "lose" in the second film so we can see them overcome the odds in the 3rd.
Comics do a very good job of hammering the heroes for long stretches of time. Why can't the movies?
They don't have to win in every film as long as they win at the end of the arc.
Comics do a very good job of hammering the heroes for long stretches of time. Why can't the movies?
They don't have to win in every film as long as they win at the end of the arc.
Posted on 4/10/13 at 8:13 pm to TideSaint
quote:
Comics do a very good job of hammering the heroes for long stretches of time. Why can't the movies?
Nolan hammered the hell out of Batman/Bruce Wayne.
Lost Rachel, Harvey Dent, all his money, Alfred, back broken, etc.
Posted on 4/10/13 at 8:28 pm to schexyoung
And the Dark Knight trilogy is considered the best adaptation of comic material yet.
Posted on 4/10/13 at 8:34 pm to Freauxzen
quote:
I would hope they don't stick with him through two films?
I'm just saying keeping him in the shadows and manipulating what's going on in the second film, and making him the true villain of the final film.
Posted on 4/10/13 at 8:40 pm to schexyoung
yeah, I've always thought of the dark knight as the joker winning
either everyone knows harvey is a murdering psycho or batman and gordon have to betray their ideals and cover it up
either everyone knows harvey is a murdering psycho or batman and gordon have to betray their ideals and cover it up
Posted on 4/10/13 at 8:41 pm to Broseph Barksdale
quote:
Onslaught
Page 1 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News