Started By
Message

re: Saints are 2nd to worst in 2014 cap space

Posted on 4/9/13 at 9:02 pm to
Posted by Patrick O Rly
y u do dis?
Member since Aug 2011
41187 posts
Posted on 4/9/13 at 9:02 pm to
So you're bothered by your own dumb logic? Now we're getting somewhere.
Posted by adono
River Ridge
Member since Sep 2003
7307 posts
Posted on 4/9/13 at 9:08 pm to
quote:

Well Jerry Jones kind of threw a monkey wrench in all of that. 1 playoff win get's you top QB money.


Actually, it really proves my point.
Romo will be getting $16 Mill a year (which is 80% of Brees' salary). Is he worth that? No.

Romo isn't Brees but he's better than anybody else they could have gotten.

Plus, you can't use Jerry Jones as a yard stick when it comes to doling out salaries...remember he made Roy Williams one of highest paid WRs in the leauge!!!
Posted by CocoLoco
Member since Jan 2012
29108 posts
Posted on 4/9/13 at 9:08 pm to
The defense in 2010 was top 5. I know, hard to
believe.

The defense in 2009 was major part of winning the Superbowl, and forced many turnovers.

The team in 2011 was arguably the best we've had, especially offensively. The defense wasnt anything good, but not awful. They had moments.


With GW the Saints were middle of the pack,
or close to it. That's all you need with an offense like the Saints. He used the personnel to attack and force turnovers. They have up yards, but got the offense the ball in key times. The defense last year was historically bad because A) no leader, and complete dysfunction. And B) a scheme that doesn't come close to fitting in with the personnel. Spags relied on pass rush from the front, the Saints do no have that. They can however get pressure from blitzing, because we saw Williams do it.

I feel a lot better about the Ryan hire knowing he is a "players coach" and the guys will want to play for him. He kinda reminds me of Williams, but with smaller tits. He will get more out of the personnel, which I personally feel fits better for the 3-4.

This post was edited on 4/9/13 at 9:14 pm
Posted by Zoltan
NOLA
Member since May 2010
1395 posts
Posted on 4/9/13 at 9:16 pm to
quote:

The team in 2011 was arguably the best we've had, especially offensively. The defense wasnt anything good, but not awful. They had moments.


The 2011 defense can be directly attributed to how blazing our offense was. We were often way ahead of opponents which gave Williams the freedom to blitz all the time even when unnecessary, in attempt to be opportunistic like 2009. The difference was he used this in close games too. What happened vs SF in the playoffs was the same scenario that happened in the ATL game we won when Michael Turner got stuffed in OT on 4th down in their own territory. The end of the game they gained like 80 yards on 3 straight plays to Harry Douglas.

Bottom line though: The cap hell is to be expected because Brees won't be around for that long. So we have to do what we can to give ourselves the best chance to win RIGHT NOW. When next season comes around we re-evaluate.

Too much God Damn pessimism pre-draft about the past. It's a new season people. That's the point of being a fan remember? Get excited until you have a reason not to be.
Posted by goatmilker
Castle Anthrax
Member since Feb 2009
64156 posts
Posted on 4/9/13 at 9:18 pm to
quote:

The defense in 2010 was top 5. I know, hard to


Does not compute.

quote:

The defense in 2009 was major part of winning the Superbowl, and forced many turnovers.


Irrelevant.
Does not compute.

quote:

The team in 2011 was arguably the best we've had, especially offensively. The defense wasnt anything good, but not awful. They had moments.


Semantics.
Does not compute.

Posted by Hurricane Mike
Member since Jun 2008
20059 posts
Posted on 4/9/13 at 9:23 pm to
The worst thing is you knew when Harper and Smith signed those extensions they were horrible deals, and we still did it. If I remember correctly Will Smith's happened right after the Charles Grant experience.
Posted by eyeran
New Orleans
Member since Dec 2007
22096 posts
Posted on 4/9/13 at 9:25 pm to
quote:

The defense in 2010 was top 5.
I know they were. Unfortunately Matt Hasselbeck remembered Roman Harper actually played safety for us
quote:

The defense in 2009 was major part of winning the Superbowl, and forced many turnovers.
Depending on turnovers year in year out is fools gold, as we've learned. That defense was still ranked at the bottom of the league. Minus Sharper we went right back to where we were.
quote:

The team in 2011 was arguably the best we've had, especially offensively.
Definitely. Thats what makes it so frustrating.
quote:

The defense wasnt anything good, but not awful. They had moments.
They were still ranked in the 20s though. And Roman Harper was still in our secondary.

This is the 3rd offseason in a row i've gotten into these same arguments and this is the 3rd year in a row i've been called a nega Saints, blah blah blah...

I could pull up threads from last year with people swearing the Spags' system was the way to go and how it was a much better fit for us.

My stance hasn't changed. We can keep changing coaches, but it means nothing if that guy is hamstrung by the same shitty players the last guy had.

Posted by Zoltan
NOLA
Member since May 2010
1395 posts
Posted on 4/9/13 at 9:31 pm to
quote:

The worst thing is you knew when Harper and Smith signed those extensions they were horrible deals, and we still did it. If I remember correctly Will Smith's happened right after the Charles Grant experience.


you're right. It was like Grant 63 mill then Smith 70 mill..
Posted by Lester Earl
Member since Nov 2003
278152 posts
Posted on 4/9/13 at 9:31 pm to
quote:

So you're bothered by your own dumb logic? Now we're getting somewhere.




my logic is dumb, but you thnk Loomis is the best GM in the league? lol, fricking dolt
Posted by LSUZombie
A Cemetery Near You
Member since Apr 2008
28875 posts
Posted on 4/9/13 at 9:31 pm to
quote:

Shut up you dumb piece of shite. Nobody cares about your tired arse argument.


Posted by goatmilker
Castle Anthrax
Member since Feb 2009
64156 posts
Posted on 4/9/13 at 9:31 pm to
Well have you just said fire Loomis and hire...?

Not trying to be a arse but I don't know if thats your position.
Posted by goatmilker
Castle Anthrax
Member since Feb 2009
64156 posts
Posted on 4/9/13 at 9:32 pm to
quote:

but you thnk Loomis is the best GM in the league?


Who said that that?

Idiot
Posted by Lester Earl
Member since Nov 2003
278152 posts
Posted on 4/9/13 at 9:34 pm to
Pat O RLY and ChadBoy think that.
Posted by goatmilker
Castle Anthrax
Member since Feb 2009
64156 posts
Posted on 4/9/13 at 9:36 pm to
quote:

Who said that that?


Quote please.

Idiot
Posted by CocoLoco
Member since Jan 2012
29108 posts
Posted on 4/9/13 at 9:41 pm to
Definitely not calling you a negasaint. I too have been incredibly frustrated with the defense. I'm just saying it doesn't have to be great. The Patriots and Packers, two similar teams to the Saints, have had bad defensive play over the years as well. Their defenses have been able to force more turnovers as of late though.


I really just want a play maker on D; even if it's just one, it'll go a long way.
Posted by Lester Earl
Member since Nov 2003
278152 posts
Posted on 4/9/13 at 9:41 pm to
why dont you ever repsond to my posts?

pussy
Posted by adono
River Ridge
Member since Sep 2003
7307 posts
Posted on 4/9/13 at 9:51 pm to
quote:

Absolutely. And when you screw up, you admit it and dump the scrubs. You don't keep throwing garbage out there year after year and blame it on the "system"
Folks waiting for a guy like Roman Harper to find himself under a 4th d coordinator are kidding themselves. He's a terrible player and should be gone. Vilma can't play anymore. Jenkins missed as many tackles as anybody in the league.
With only a couple changes, we're basically throwing the same garbage out there on defense that we had last year and wishing upon a star that guys like Harper magically grow new legs and the ability to run with TEs and receivers.


Well said!

Posted by eyeran
New Orleans
Member since Dec 2007
22096 posts
Posted on 4/9/13 at 10:07 pm to
quote:

Well have you just said fire Loomis and hire...?

Not trying to be a arse but I don't know if thats your position.
No, I don't think he should be fired. I just don't think he should be as bulletproof as he is.

He isn't new at this, he's been on the job as long as anybody in the league, over a decade.

He's got Benson handing him blank checks, there's no excuse for fielding arena league defenses every year.
Posted by CocoLoco
Member since Jan 2012
29108 posts
Posted on 4/9/13 at 10:29 pm to
quote:

He's got Benson handing him blank checks, there's no excuse for fielding arena league defenses every year.



He's not the talent evaluator though, he is signing who he's asked to. He is the numbers guy. Yes, there have been terrible contracts like Roman Harper, which they were forced to give way more than they wanted because of the market. We all hate that contract, but there really wan't anyone else. However, he has brought in people that changed the culture of the New Orleans Saints and made them a good team. For whatever reason, this team has had many poor draft choices on defense, but that is not the work of Loomis.
Posted by goatmilker
Castle Anthrax
Member since Feb 2009
64156 posts
Posted on 4/10/13 at 7:04 am to
quote:

I just don't think he should be as bulletproof as he is


He looked anything but bullet proof last year. And I don't know what you do to a underperforming GM except fire them.

first pageprev pagePage 4 of 9Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram