- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Nnamdi unlikely
Posted on 3/27/13 at 10:23 am
Posted on 3/27/13 at 10:23 am
Hey brothers just got off the phone with the drivesource. He tells me we're about 7-9M OFF Nnamdis price TAG. It looks like we're only offering him a 1-2 year deal that helps us with the transition of the new D and helps him by OFFERING FA next year if he re-establishes himself. But he will probably OPT to go with the longer term deal as well as play with a title contender in the BAY area.
DRIVEMAN OUT
DRIVEMAN OUT
20
Posted on 3/27/13 at 10:24 am to death valley driver
Posted on 3/27/13 at 10:25 am to death valley driver
Did your source say anything about Vince Young?
Posted on 3/27/13 at 10:25 am to death valley driver
Well done. 
Posted on 3/27/13 at 10:27 am to death valley driver
quote:
He tells me we're about 7-9M OFF Nnamdis price TAG
Uhhhh
Posted on 3/27/13 at 10:27 am to death valley driver
I fricking hate you and your stupid signature
Posted on 3/27/13 at 10:27 am to death valley driver
quote:
drivesource
But seriously, no way he gets that kind of money, especially if it is just between us and SF.
This post was edited on 3/27/13 at 10:31 am
Posted on 3/27/13 at 10:28 am to death valley driver
San Fran has even less money to work with than us and he might not even be their #1 corner.
I think the whole "playing with a contender" thing in regards to San Fran is overblown. Well be just as much of a contender as anyone next year.
I think the whole "playing with a contender" thing in regards to San Fran is overblown. Well be just as much of a contender as anyone next year.
Posted on 3/27/13 at 10:33 am to death valley driver
quote:
DRIVEMAN OUT
Good and never come back.
Posted on 3/27/13 at 10:33 am to mm2316
quote:
But seriously, no way he gets that kind of money, especially if it is just between us and SF
over the total length of the deal its possible if they offer him 3-4 years brother
Posted on 3/27/13 at 10:34 am to death valley driver
Posted on 3/27/13 at 10:34 am to death valley driver
quote:
He tells me we're about 7-9M OFF Nnamdis price TAG. It looks like we're only offering him a 1-2 year
There were reports we're offering more money. Money means nothing unless it's guaranteed. 7-9 m more a what? Over 8 years? 2 years?
Posted on 3/27/13 at 10:34 am to death valley driver
Not sure why all the reports are saying our deal is better than SF's. What are they offering him? The vet min for 3-4 years?
Posted on 3/27/13 at 10:35 am to death valley driver
SF will still probably be in worse shape than us in 3-4 years considering Kaepernik is still on his rookie deal.
I'm guessing you're still IN, since you didn't announce yourself OUT.
I'm guessing you're still IN, since you didn't announce yourself OUT.
Posted on 3/27/13 at 10:36 am to death valley driver
quote:
DRIVEMAN OUT
this is why i can't take you seriously
Posted on 3/27/13 at 10:40 am to Geauxld Finger
He's trolling.
Posted on 3/27/13 at 10:40 am to death valley driver
This makes no sense to the situation....
1) If it were that big of a difference and everyone was so sure SF was the title contender, his decision would have been made a long time ago.
2) All of the reports have been that he is completely torn between both teams...if he is torn then the contracts have to be almost identical and I doubt they are either one year deals or more than 3 years. Both teams are strapped or cash so it's going to be a multiple year deal with the first year being cap friendly.
3) All report have said the Saints are pushing hard to get him...there is no way if they were 7-9 mil off they would be "pushing hard". That's Kruger money and his price tag was too high for the Saints.
1) If it were that big of a difference and everyone was so sure SF was the title contender, his decision would have been made a long time ago.
2) All of the reports have been that he is completely torn between both teams...if he is torn then the contracts have to be almost identical and I doubt they are either one year deals or more than 3 years. Both teams are strapped or cash so it's going to be a multiple year deal with the first year being cap friendly.
3) All report have said the Saints are pushing hard to get him...there is no way if they were 7-9 mil off they would be "pushing hard". That's Kruger money and his price tag was too high for the Saints.
Posted on 3/27/13 at 10:41 am to Cajun Revolution
Take your own advice
This post was edited on 3/27/13 at 10:42 am
Posted on 3/27/13 at 10:43 am to death valley driver
you are approaching TulaneLSU territory
Posted on 3/27/13 at 10:43 am to Cajun Revolution
quote:
Good and never come back.
No.
He can stay.
But you need to go.
Page 1 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News