Started By
Message

re: Planned freshwater diversions will doom LA salt fishing

Posted on 3/27/13 at 8:53 am to
Posted by canyon
Member since Dec 2003
18287 posts
Posted on 3/27/13 at 8:53 am to

How about the whole state doomed if they DON'T do something?
Posted by bayoudude
Member since Dec 2007
24946 posts
Posted on 3/27/13 at 8:58 am to
Sorry but i can't agree on this one. Being someone that lives so close to so much coastal erosion i have seen first hand how much land we have lost. I would rather have a further run to catch a speckled trout than have everything wash away. Fresh water into the marsh is a good thing almost instantly freshwater grasses take over creating land.
This post was edited on 3/27/13 at 8:59 am
Posted by meauxjeaux2
watson
Member since Oct 2007
60283 posts
Posted on 3/27/13 at 9:00 am to
quote:

Being someone that lives so close to so much coastal erosion i have seen first hand how much land we have lost.
I work with historical aerial photography every day. You should see what I see every day.
Posted by bayoudude
Member since Dec 2007
24946 posts
Posted on 3/27/13 at 9:02 am to
I bet. If you haven't fished an area in southern terrebonne in over a year chances are it doesn't look the same anymore and you may not even be able to find it.
Posted by hardhead
stinky bayou
Member since Jun 2009
5745 posts
Posted on 3/27/13 at 9:03 am to
quote:

land loss in Caenarvon is greater area that all deltas built by all freshwater diversions.


and that has nothing to do with storms?
Posted by PvilleP
Prairieville
Member since Apr 2011
1950 posts
Posted on 3/27/13 at 9:03 am to
If the levees had never been built in the 1920's, would we be having this discussion today?
Those levees were built almost 100 years ago with the engineering knowledge of that day.
That's what they though was the best thing to do at the time.
BTW, silent films, the Charleston and Prohibition were also popular in the 20's.


Posted by eng08
Member since Jan 2013
5997 posts
Posted on 3/27/13 at 9:07 am to
I will agree with you on one point Deege, diversions alone are worthless.

If the diversion has no sediment load then it will not work as intended/hoped.

If there is a sediment load then it will work beautifully.

As stated above the entire goal of the new diversions is to capture sediment and water in order to reduce the amount of dredging which is very expensive. It's a great example of the "work smarter not harder" philosophy.
Posted by jimbeam
University of LSU
Member since Oct 2011
75703 posts
Posted on 3/27/13 at 9:11 am to
Exactly.

Let nature do the work
Posted by meauxjeaux2
watson
Member since Oct 2007
60283 posts
Posted on 3/27/13 at 9:11 am to
quote:

If you haven't fished an area in southern terrebonne in over a year chances are it doesn't look the same anymore and you may not even be able to find it.


I have access to some pretty valuable fishing data. I know where all the old islands and jetties are.
Posted by bayoudude
Member since Dec 2007
24946 posts
Posted on 3/27/13 at 9:15 am to
You work for a survey company?
Posted by jimbeam
University of LSU
Member since Oct 2011
75703 posts
Posted on 3/27/13 at 9:19 am to



Drone company
Posted by meauxjeaux2
watson
Member since Oct 2007
60283 posts
Posted on 3/27/13 at 9:20 am to
quote:

Drone company
pretty much except our drones are manned.
Posted by ADLSUNSU
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2007
3518 posts
Posted on 3/27/13 at 9:40 am to
quote:

diversions alone are worthless


Yea there was a profession speaking at the TedX the other day that talked about a few things that would help.

They actually have a program to pump wastewater to the marsh outside of nola, and then make an effort to plant cypress trees in the areas that they used to be in.

The problem with the water is that it gets a higher N count when diversion/wastewater is present due to nutrients.
Nutria like the Nitrogen high plants more than not and they destroy and eat all the young plants, etc.

They are using pvc devices to protect sapling trees

This is who spoke LINK
The page on the project and some helpful links LINK

and the page for the Coalition to Restore Coastal Louisiana LINK (they have links to articles supporting what some in this thread have been talking about as well.
Posted by Deege
Member since Dec 2007
843 posts
Posted on 3/27/13 at 9:41 am to
That's right. Important to know what the sediment load of the river was when most of the delta was built vs what it is now vs what it will be.
Posted by Deege
Member since Dec 2007
843 posts
Posted on 3/27/13 at 9:44 am to
Salt water marshes have substantial root systems that resist erosion and storm surge damage. Caernavon proved that freshwater vegetation is mostly floatant and easily washed away.
Posted by ADLSUNSU
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2007
3518 posts
Posted on 3/27/13 at 9:59 am to
well freshwater alone would only bring floating veg, but with sediments it would rebuild the area into land. Then with replaced Cypress marsh, it would return to (i think) the bottomland forest that it used to be, then the saltwater plants would just be in a new location as the mass advances.

But this all depends on sediments. I would like to read more on the diversions that do incorporate more sediments.
Posted by ToulatownTiger
Louisiana
Member since Oct 2012
4597 posts
Posted on 3/27/13 at 10:01 am to
Id rather catch bass instead of specs in these places and be able to show the grandkids where i grew up instead of showing them water saying "the house was out there somewhere
Posted by Hammertime
Will trade dowsing rod for titties
Member since Jan 2012
43030 posts
Posted on 3/27/13 at 10:10 am to
The last discussion went like this:

Freshwater diversion =/= sediment diversion
Freshwater marsh =/= saltwater marsh


That basically sums it up. Until you get the sediment diverted, not much is gonna happen
Posted by ADLSUNSU
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2007
3518 posts
Posted on 3/27/13 at 10:12 am to
I guess that is where the wastewater pumping project got interesting.

The title of the talk was "take a few good shits on the levees of Louisiana"

Posted by jimbeam
University of LSU
Member since Oct 2011
75703 posts
Posted on 3/27/13 at 10:12 am to
Yea WWTP pumping is a viable locall option
Jump to page
Page 1 2 3 4 5 ... 19
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 19Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram