Guantanamo will get $195.7 million in renovations and new construction | Page 4 | TigerDroppings.com

Posted byMessage
Blue Velvet
Colorado State Fan
Apple butter toast is nice
Member since Nov 2009
15990 posts

re: Guantanamo will get $195.7 million in renovations and new construction


Surely you support this. You aren't thrilled that your alma mater is getting upgraded?





Back to top
  Replies (0)
Aubie Spr96
Auburn Fan
lolwut?
Member since Dec 2009
14616 posts

re: Guantanamo will get $195.7 million in renovations and new construction


quote:

These terrorists captured are enemy combatants. They are not subject to US law, they are subject to military tribunal. Gitmo is a military detention center.



The only thing they've been subject to so far is indefinite detention without trial. Why anyone trusts the gov't in this is beyond me? If they are guilty, try them and sentence them. It really is that easy.

America as a whole has a rich history of freedom and human rights. Have we had our missteps? Absolutely. They typically have occur during some kind of war.






Back to top
  Replies (0)
Blue Velvet
Colorado State Fan
Apple butter toast is nice
Member since Nov 2009
15990 posts

re: Guantanamo will get $195.7 million in renovations and new construction


quote:

These terrorists captured are enemy combatants.
You don't know what you are talking about.






Back to top
  Replies (0)
Godfather1
Army Fan
SE Louisiana
Member since Oct 2006
32256 posts

re: Guantanamo will get $195.7 million in renovations and new construction


quote:

they're f'n terrorists....they're always pissed off.


I've never quite understood how people fail to grasp this simple concept.






Back to top
  Replies (0)
RCDfan1950
LSU Fan
United States
Member since Feb 2007
10950 posts

re: Guantanamo will get $195.7 million in renovations and new construction


They need to send Sheriff Joe Arpio done there to do the *renovations*!

Dog and pony show up there. What a shame; it's gonna hurt a lot of good folk.

Earth 2013






Back to top
  Replies (0)


Back to top