Started By
Message
locked post

Nnamdi tidbit (comparing DB's)

Posted on 3/21/13 at 11:28 am
Posted by LSUFreek
Greater New Orleans
Member since Jan 2007
14729 posts
Posted on 3/21/13 at 11:28 am
My fingers are crossed that the Saints haven't come to an impasse with Nnamdi cuz I like this tidbit:


I can't find Nnamdi's surely-pedestrian stats with Philly, but when he was with Oakland:

2007: only targeted 31 times, just 10 completions allowed (32%)
2008: only targeted 27 times, just 8 completions allowed (29.6%)
2009: only targeted 27 times, just 13 completions allowed (48%)
2010: only targeted 27 times, just 10 completions allowed (37%)




...And just by comparison since I can't find Revis or Greer's best years:

PFF said in 2011, Jabari Greer was targeted 121 times, and receivers caught 67 of them for a 55% comp rate.
They pointed out Darrelle Revis was targeted 85 times and receivers caught 35 passes for a 41.2% comp rate.


It's a little skewed because it's not the ideal comparison, but one can still agree that Nnamdi had his own island just two short years ago,and having an OL-coach-turned-DC probably is more to blame for Nnamdi's mediocre performance than a deterioration of skils.

Make it happen, Loomis!
Posted by SaintEB
Member since Jul 2008
22609 posts
Posted on 3/21/13 at 11:28 am to
Charlie Casserly says he doesn't think Nnamdi can run anymore.
Posted by DelU249
Austria
Member since Dec 2010
77625 posts
Posted on 3/21/13 at 11:31 am to
Casserly is fricking stupid.
Posted by SaintEB
Member since Jul 2008
22609 posts
Posted on 3/21/13 at 11:32 am to
I know. They tried saying that with Champ Baily about 4 years ago. Dude is still a good corner.
Posted by Hugo Stiglitz
Member since Oct 2010
72937 posts
Posted on 3/21/13 at 11:36 am to
I think it's a good sign we haven't heard any news of Nnamdi shopping other teams.


And the way Ed Reed played out with him being a Texans lock then looking like it fell through only to find out the Texans were courting him all along to finally sign five days later.

Gives me hope.
This post was edited on 3/21/13 at 11:50 am
Posted by Hugo Stiglitz
Member since Oct 2010
72937 posts
Posted on 3/21/13 at 11:39 am to
quote:

Charlie Casserly says he doesn't think Nnamdi can run anymore.

I heard him say this yesterday too, he also said 36 year old Charles Woodson might be a nice fit for the Saints if no other team gives him a good offer.
Posted by LSUFreek
Greater New Orleans
Member since Jan 2007
14729 posts
Posted on 3/21/13 at 11:42 am to
quote:

And the way Ed Reed played out with him being a Texans lock then looking like it fell through only to find out the Texas were courting him all along to finally sign five days later.


Very encouraging.



Also looking at the stats above, I just realized what it really tells us: teams will continue to throw at Jabari !
Posted by BobBoucher
Member since Jan 2008
16701 posts
Posted on 3/21/13 at 11:48 am to
quote:

I think it's a good sign we haven't heard any news of Nnamdi shopping other teams.


these quiet days may be a bit of a realization that not everyone is going to be banging down his door anymore and that maybe he should get going before the bottom falls out of the market and no one has any cap $$$ left.
Posted by dnwsr
Thibodaux
Member since Apr 2007
3793 posts
Posted on 3/21/13 at 11:52 am to
So you use Nnamdi's stats from 2007-2010, but then pick out 2011 for Greer and Revis? I could also dig up some really nice stats for Brian Urlacher (and countless others) from 3-6 years ago. The bottom line is Nnamdi was a below average corner in Philly last year and wasn't much better the year before. He was consistently beaten deep and has clearly lost a step. The stats for the last two years are far more relevant than the ones you posted. Nnamdi graded out well below Greer last year.

In Oakland, Nnamdi was not targeted in part because he stayed on the right side of the defense, which also tends to be the less favored side by qb's. Furthermore, the other corners were pedestrian so that is a big part of why he wasn't challenged. There is no doubt that he was playing at a high level, but there were scouts in that initial free agency period who doubted whether he could replicate that performance in another defense. And those skeptics were justified by his subpar performance in Philly.

I can't understand why people are so excited about the prospect of getting a guy who has clearly lost a step (or two) and has not performed at a high level in three years when there is already a proven, consistent player on the roster at that position in Greer. If Nnamdi could come in and compete with Greer, Robinson, and Lewis and win the job that way, I'd be more than happy with it. But since they likely can't keep all of those salaries (even for a short time), it basically means that they are assuming Nnamdi can play more like he did 3-6 years ago than he has the past two seasons and that's an unacceptable risk IMO.

On a final note, Robinson actually played pretty well the year before last (better than Nnamdi has been playing in Philly). If you are willing to overlook two poor years by Nnamdi, then why can't you look past one by Robinson; especially given he is a young player with the potential to improve?
Posted by BobBoucher
Member since Jan 2008
16701 posts
Posted on 3/21/13 at 11:56 am to
quote:

a guy who has clearly lost a step (or two)


he lost a step. in his athletic prime. sure.

or... his best attribute is using his hands and being physical but he was asked to play off in Philly which didnt suit his skills (which is what NFL peeps are saying).

which makes more sense?
This post was edited on 3/21/13 at 11:57 am
Posted by jembeurt
Raceland
Member since Apr 2008
8804 posts
Posted on 3/21/13 at 1:23 pm to
I saw him yesterday saying that which kind of alarmed me.

Then I realized that for the DE spot on his Saints Depth Chart Board was "S. Ellis". It wasn't a close shot of it so I thought that I was seeing things and but then they showed it again.

Great analysis there boys.

Found it. 3:49 mark
This post was edited on 3/21/13 at 1:33 pm
Posted by dnwsr
Thibodaux
Member since Apr 2007
3793 posts
Posted on 3/21/13 at 2:36 pm to
quote:

he lost a step. in his athletic prime. sure.

or... his best attribute is using his hands and being physical but he was asked to play off in Philly which didnt suit his skills (which is what NFL peeps are saying).

which makes more sense?



Considering scouts are saying he has lost a step (even those who say he can still turn things around) and the evidence on the field points that way as well, I'll go with that over a generalization about athletic primes. I'd also argue that most players in the nfl are faster at 26 than at 30-31 so I don't even think the generalization stands.

It's also a myth that Nnamdi didn't play press coverage in Philly. It was a zone, but he did indeed get a lot of snaps in press coverage (according to PFF, he got the fourth most snaps in the league in press coverage). And versatility is an important variable as well. Nnamdi's inability to play well in a zone shouldn't be discounted. It speaks to a limitation on his overall talent. On the other hand, Greer came from a primarily zone defense in Buffalo and excelled in the man scheme of Williams as well.

The problem is that people are placing much more weight on reputation/name recognition and not enough on actual, on field production. I could give him a bit of a pass for one off year, but he actually got worse in the second year with Philly and we have players on the roster who have played better than him in that same time span.

On a final note, Nnamdi wasn't all that fast to begin with. So losing a step or two is significant. He was never a burner.
This post was edited on 3/21/13 at 2:46 pm
Posted by Sophandros
Victoria Concordia Crescit
Member since Feb 2005
45218 posts
Posted on 3/21/13 at 5:07 pm to
I'm bookmarking this thread, FWIW.
Posted by koLSU86
Member since Aug 2012
3471 posts
Posted on 3/21/13 at 5:43 pm to
quote:

Considering scouts are saying he has lost a step (even those who say he can still turn things around) and the evidence on the field points that way as well, I'll go with that over a generalization about athletic primes. I'd also argue that most players in the nfl are faster at 26 than at 30-31 so I don't even think the generalization stands. It's also a myth that Nnamdi didn't play press coverage in Philly. It was a zone, but he did indeed get a lot of snaps in press coverage (according to PFF, he got the fourth most snaps in the league in press coverage). And versatility is an important variable as well. Nnamdi's inability to play well in a zone shouldn't be discounted. It speaks to a limitation on his overall talent. On the other hand, Greer came from a primarily zone defense in Buffalo and excelled in the man scheme of Williams as well. The problem is that people are placing much more weight on reputation/name recognition and not enough on actual, on field production. I could give him a bit of a pass for one off year, but he actually got worse in the second year with Philly and we have players on the roster who have played better than him in that same time span. On a final note, Nnamdi wasn't all that fast to begin with. So losing a step or two is significant. He was never a burner.


I don't care if he's lost 3 steps. He's still better than that shite sandwich the saints put on the field for coverage last year. I'm not pointing out one player because none of them could cover anyone. It was the saddest thing I've ever watched on a football field. Maybe some of it was the coaching but a NFL DB should be good enough to make up for some of that regardless. It doesn't get much worse than what we saw last year so I don't really get where you're coming from when you criticize everything about the guy. Take a look at our DBs last year and tell me they were better lol. I'll wait.
Posted by dnwsr
Thibodaux
Member since Apr 2007
3793 posts
Posted on 3/21/13 at 6:01 pm to
quote:

Take a look at our DBs last year and tell me they were better lol. I'll wait.



Did you even watch the Eagles play? And if so, did you watch the secondary closely? Greer played better than Nnamdi last year. The eyeball test, scouts, stats, and the advanced metrics at PFF all point to that. It's foolish to assume that nobody on the defense played well because the unit as a whole was awful. By your logic (or lack thereof), we should just change every player on the defense. Harper and Jenkins finished at the bottom of the rankings for their respective positions and there was no pass rush. Greer was solid for the most part and Robinson was bad, but Nnamdi was worse.

Nnamdi wouldn't be coming in to replace Robinson because he is on his rookie contract. So you have to compare Greer and Nnamdi and if you take unfounded assumptions and name recognition out of the equation, it is evident that Greer has been the better player the last few seasons.
Posted by htran90
BC
Member since Dec 2012
30080 posts
Posted on 3/21/13 at 6:07 pm to
quote:

Then I realized that for the DE spot on his Saints Depth Chart Board was "S. Ellis". It wasn't a close shot of it so I thought that I was seeing things and but then they showed it again.



I'm sure I saw scott shanle and devery henderson too , but they're in yellow so that means they are FA who were on the team last year?
Posted by Hugo Stiglitz
Member since Oct 2010
72937 posts
Posted on 3/21/13 at 6:10 pm to
I hear ya, I have similar concerns about Nnamdi as well.

I hope you're mostly playing devil's advocate in this thread and don't really believe Nnamdi is now garbage.

The criticism is deserved after his last two seasons in Philly. And one you didn't mention is his passion for the game being in question (probably the one that worries me the most)

Yes, Picking up Nnamdi is a risk and could backfire which is why I don't think the Saints should throw a bunch of money at him.

It could also be the beginning of the reemergence as the shut down corner he was in Oakland. There is no better place in the NFL for this to happen than New Orleans with a coaching staff that is knowledgable on how to use him effectively.

And even if he does return to form, there are several other issues on defense that need to be addressed. He would not be the answer to our defensive problems alone, no matter how good he is.
This post was edited on 3/21/13 at 6:27 pm
Posted by koLSU86
Member since Aug 2012
3471 posts
Posted on 3/21/13 at 6:56 pm to
quote:

Did you even watch the Eagles play? And if so, did you watch the secondary closely? Greer played better than Nnamdi last year. The eyeball test, scouts, stats, and the advanced metrics at PFF all point to that. It's foolish to assume that nobody on the defense played well because the unit as a whole was awful. By your logic (or lack thereof), we should just change every player on the defense. Harper and Jenkins finished at the bottom of the rankings for their respective positions and there was no pass rush. Greer was solid for the most part and Robinson was bad, but Nnamdi was worse. Nnamdi wouldn't be coming in to replace Robinson because he is on his rookie contract. So you have to compare Greer and Nnamdi and if you take unfounded assumptions and name recognition out of the equation, it is evident that Greer has been the better player the last few seasons.


Where did I say that no one on defense played well? I was strictly referring to the defensive backs. Greer is the only one that played half arse worth a shite. He didn't even play as well as he did in previous seasons. You can say I wasn't using logic all you want but I just don't see where anyone in that defensive backfield played worth a damn. I even said that maybe it was on spags. I don't know because I'm not at practice or in the locker room. At the same time though any DB that has made it into the NFL should be able to cover better than they did 95% of the time last season. I just feel that nnadi is a better option than the players we have.

His best years were under the coordinator we just hired. So I think it's worth a shot. There's no way he could be worse in coverage than Robinson. He was out right awful last year. He wasn't that good in Philly at all, but to just automatically assume he's now garbage is using the same logic (or lack there of) that you accused me of.
Posted by koLSU86
Member since Aug 2012
3471 posts
Posted on 3/21/13 at 7:00 pm to
quote:

And even if he does return to form, there are several other issues on defense that need to be addressed. He would not be the answer to our defensive problems alone, no matter how good he is.


I agree with this 100%. The DBs were the biggest problem I believe but we need a pass rush worth a shite even if we do upgrade in that area. The defense as a unit just played bad last year. There were some bright spots with lofton and improvement from cam Jordan and also hicks looked good. The whole thing needs to be made better, but our coverage is a damn good place to start.
Posted by goatmilker
Castle Anthrax
Member since Feb 2009
64126 posts
Posted on 3/21/13 at 7:01 pm to
Asom.
The new free safety of the Saints
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram