- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Point guarding the pelicans for the next two seasons
Posted on 3/2/13 at 8:05 pm
Posted on 3/2/13 at 8:05 pm
After more than 50 games of the season I am prepare to make a prediction about the Vasquez-New Orleans relationship. I am fairly confident that Vasquez will be the starting point guard next year and then he will be traded in the 2014 off season. Here are my reasons:
Next year he will cost the team2.15 million, regardless of how much people like or dislike Vasquez I doubt that there is anyone out there that would argue that is not a bargain.
So the plan would be to expend the money this year in the other needs of the team signing one elite player, as well as a decent additional shutting guard. Next year then, which would be a transition year towards becoming a legit contender in the 2014-2015 season, Vasquez would start and Rivers will be the backup point guard with extended minutes as they will play some time together (about 32 MPG for Vasquez, and about 28 mpg for Rivers).
By doing so, you develop Rivers, develop the team around Gordon, Davis and the new elite player that has been signed and keep Vasquez value up. At the end of the 2013-1014 season you trade Vasquez after been top 5 in Assists for two consecutive years, (notice that I did not say top 5 PG just top 5 in assists) and get the chance to get either a nice player that could be a good back up PG if Austin become the PG he has the potential to become, or a good solid defensive PG.
So in 2014- 2015 you would have a well-developed solid team that can be a serious playoff contender. Notice that under this scenario we may still make the playoffs in 2013-14, but are likely to be out in the first or second round).
Next year he will cost the team2.15 million, regardless of how much people like or dislike Vasquez I doubt that there is anyone out there that would argue that is not a bargain.
So the plan would be to expend the money this year in the other needs of the team signing one elite player, as well as a decent additional shutting guard. Next year then, which would be a transition year towards becoming a legit contender in the 2014-2015 season, Vasquez would start and Rivers will be the backup point guard with extended minutes as they will play some time together (about 32 MPG for Vasquez, and about 28 mpg for Rivers).
By doing so, you develop Rivers, develop the team around Gordon, Davis and the new elite player that has been signed and keep Vasquez value up. At the end of the 2013-1014 season you trade Vasquez after been top 5 in Assists for two consecutive years, (notice that I did not say top 5 PG just top 5 in assists) and get the chance to get either a nice player that could be a good back up PG if Austin become the PG he has the potential to become, or a good solid defensive PG.
So in 2014- 2015 you would have a well-developed solid team that can be a serious playoff contender. Notice that under this scenario we may still make the playoffs in 2013-14, but are likely to be out in the first or second round).
Posted on 3/2/13 at 8:08 pm to morsatun
he's gone once brian roberts establishes himself
Posted on 3/2/13 at 8:46 pm to morsatun
I know that he has committed a lot of turnovers, but I would like to see Gordon with the ball in his hands with Rivers at shooting guard. Gordon does have good vision and passes well. I respect Vasquez for his work ethic and improvement, but when you see him play against a guy like Westbrook you know that he is not that good.
Posted on 3/2/13 at 8:55 pm to bearhc
If he could consistently hit the 3, I would love to slide him to the 2 in certain situations with a dynamic PG at the 1
Posted on 3/2/13 at 10:15 pm to The Future
I think you guys misunderstood what I wss trayng to say.
I am not saying Vasquez is the long term solution or the ideal player for us. I just think that in terms of strategy it is better to run with him next year and trade him the year after.
I am not saying Vasquez is the long term solution or the ideal player for us. I just think that in terms of strategy it is better to run with him next year and trade him the year after.
Posted on 3/2/13 at 11:43 pm to Lester Earl
quote:
he's gone once brian roberts establishes himself
Posted on 3/3/13 at 4:33 am to morsatun
It's posts like this that make me believe 80% of hornets talk posters are retarded.
Posted on 3/3/13 at 8:39 am to Tayday
So that's why you decide to post? To showcase your retardation?
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News