quote: As far as the no touchdowns in forever for our football team in Tiger Stadium, I want to see them hold the guys we have now to no touchdowns. Florida sure couldn't! You Tiger fans keep on saying that, but it is hollow because they want no part of us now. We would have fun playing them this year with your downgraded defense that left for the draft because they have no confidence in the team.
re: LSU vs ULL name for rivalry. (Posted on 2/27/13 at 2:44 am to mdomingue)
This is the LA state law mandating any member of the Univ. of LA Board of Regents. Look under B(2)(a). The Board can change names of members to "Univ. of LA @ (location). There is zero mention of any member having the legal claim to being called "the Univ. of LA" w/o the location tag included.
re: LSU vs ULL name for rivalry. (Posted on 2/27/13 at 3:02 am to GOAT1986)
quote: Rivalry? Not even close
How about we compare recent history, say starting in the 80s? Series history: Bama leads 18-15-1 # of SEC FB titles: Bama (4 outright & 2 shared) LSU (5 outright & 1 shared) # of AP/coaches' nat'l titles: Bama (3/3) LSU (1/2)
Counting games & seasons from more than a generation ago says little about the state of a series as it stands now. Among other SEC members, only Florida has had the same high level of success vs Bama & in general. By your line of reasoning, Bama-Auburn & Bama-UT aren't rivalries either since those 2 have experienced less success than LSU has in comparison to Bama.