Started By
Message

re: Explain to me what's special about Revolvers

Posted on 1/31/13 at 7:09 am to
Posted by Coach in Waiting
Sixth Ward
Member since Oct 2009
601 posts
Posted on 1/31/13 at 7:09 am to
Hitler says revolvers don't need magazines.
Posted by KingRanch
The Ranch
Member since Mar 2012
61590 posts
Posted on 1/31/13 at 7:10 am to
That was a great line in that video

Posted by KingRanch
The Ranch
Member since Mar 2012
61590 posts
Posted on 1/31/13 at 7:10 am to
That and the tapco is melted down Pringles lids

Posted by Ole Geauxt
KnowLa.
Member since Dec 2007
50880 posts
Posted on 1/31/13 at 7:13 am to
quote:

Reliability of revolver is a myth.
Acting like a kernt doesn't always make you one, but you do try hard.
Posted by Ace Midnight
Between sanity and madness
Member since Dec 2006
89475 posts
Posted on 1/31/13 at 3:34 pm to
quote:

Reliability of revolver is a myth. DA revolvers have more parts than an autoloader.


Revolvers have an incredible record of reliability. A "myth", would be that revolvers "never" fail, and, of course, all weapons and other machines (even Toyota engines) have mechanical failures, no matter how well built and maintained.

The goal of the pistol refinements are precisely to approach the sort of reliability enjoyed by revolvers - the standard Sig and Glock designs, which were refinements on Browning's proven action, in particular, were responses to the 'finickiness' and questionable reliability of early 20th century pistols.
This post was edited on 1/31/13 at 3:36 pm
Posted by hardhead
stinky bayou
Member since Jun 2009
5745 posts
Posted on 1/31/13 at 3:47 pm to
quote:

Except for a Glock.


60% of the time, it works every time


revolvers dont leave brass (with fingerprints) on the ground
Posted by PvilleP
Prairieville
Member since Apr 2011
1950 posts
Posted on 1/31/13 at 4:38 pm to
quote:

For rounds with insane pressures, lightning-fast muzzle velocity, and bone-crushing muzzle energy, you CANNOT beat a revolver. PERIOD


It has little to do with pressure, velocity, etc.
You wouldn't want to cycle a round as long as a .500 S&W through a semi-auto.
Yes, there is the Automag that shot .44 Magnum, but they were known to never cycle correctly.
The slide would have to move back too far and the gun would not cycle correctly.

It's also not as much as revolvers being more reliable to shoot as much as being easier to fix a malfunction. If a double action revolver doesn't fire, simple pull the trigger and the cylinder rotates to the next round. If a semi doesn't fire, it's TRB - TAP, RACK, BANG!




.44 Mag, .500 S&W,9mm, 5.56
Notice how much longer the revolver cartridges are

Posted by AlxTgr
Kyre Banorg
Member since Oct 2003
81604 posts
Posted on 1/31/13 at 4:44 pm to
Well, there is .50 Action Express.
Posted by PvilleP
Prairieville
Member since Apr 2011
1950 posts
Posted on 1/31/13 at 4:52 pm to
quote:

Well, there is .50 Action Express

That's only 33mm long
.500 S&W is 57mm long

I didn't say that it couldn't be done. The recoil operation is very finicky with larger cartridge lengths. The recoil spring for a semi auto would have to be huge to run those rounds. The magazine would also be huge resulting in a very large grip. The only reason why AR and AK pistols work is that the magazine is forward of the grip.
This post was edited on 1/31/13 at 4:53 pm
Posted by AlxTgr
Kyre Banorg
Member since Oct 2003
81604 posts
Posted on 1/31/13 at 4:56 pm to
You just said revolver cartridges. It's as long as the 44 and 357.
Posted by LSU Tigershark
10,000 posts
Member since Dec 2007
10543 posts
Posted on 1/31/13 at 5:02 pm to
quote:

22 short - 22 long rifle - 22 magnum


I thought 22mags use a different diameter casing
Posted by bapple
Capital City
Member since Oct 2010
11875 posts
Posted on 1/31/13 at 6:19 pm to
quote:

I thought 22mags use a different diameter casing


EDIT: Just researched it a bit - it isn't recommended. But I would probably do it since it's so much cheaper.
This post was edited on 1/31/13 at 6:29 pm
Posted by jack6294
Greater Baton Rouge Area
Member since Jan 2007
4033 posts
Posted on 1/31/13 at 7:03 pm to
Generally I'm more accurate with a revolver, though my 1911 is very impressive
S&W stainless magnums are beautiful
Posted by DownshiftAndFloorIt
Here
Member since Jan 2011
66763 posts
Posted on 1/31/13 at 7:12 pm to
They definitely are not interchangeable.

A .22lr has a 0.22" case diameter. A .22mag has a larger case diameter and its longer.
Posted by Bob Ag
Austin
Member since Aug 2011
3008 posts
Posted on 1/31/13 at 8:17 pm to
Yea thats why the Ruger single six comes with two cylinders for .22lr and mag.

Personally I like revolvers for a few reasons.

1. Snubbies make great concealed carry pieces, esp j frames.

2. Reliable

3. Great looking firearms. Other than 1911s, semi autos are pretty ugly handguns. Most revolvers are pretty nice looking.
Posted by Fat Bastard
coach, investor, gambler
Member since Mar 2009
72454 posts
Posted on 1/31/13 at 8:20 pm to
quote:

Except for a Glock.



I like my glocks and my revolvers.
Posted by JAB528
The Mexican Ocean
Member since Jun 2012
16870 posts
Posted on 1/31/13 at 8:22 pm to
Downshift what u know about this heritage rough rider? Is it a complete piece of shite?
Posted by CoastieGM
Member since Aug 2012
3185 posts
Posted on 1/31/13 at 9:16 pm to
quote:

Are they mainly used for fun these days, maybe competition? Or do they still provide a practical advantage in everyday life?


Reasons:

1. Moose
2. Bear
3. Cougar
4. Simple/Reliable as frick
5. Can be powerful as frick
6. Accurate as frick
7. Can often use 2 different "calibers" in same pistol
first pageprev pagePage 5 of 5Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram