How much talent did the Trailblazers have? How big of a dissapointment were they | Page 2 | TigerDroppings.com

Posted byMessage
UltimateHog
Arkansas Fan
Springfield, MO
Member since Dec 2011
35626 posts

re: How much talent did the Trailblazers have? How big of a dissapointment were they


Portlands starting 5 is very very good, led by LA down low and the rookie of the year at PG.

Batum is a stud with a solid all around game, Hickson is good for what he is asked to do as a 5th option when they are all on the floor, and Mathews can shoot it.

If they had a couple of bench players they're a 5-6 seed team.






Back to top
thenry712
Gonzaga Fan
Zasullia, Ukraine
Member since Nov 2008
15360 posts

re: How much talent did the Trailblazers have? How big of a dissapointment were they


It's pretty damning when you google image "Portland Trail Blazers Medical staff and the results just show a bunch of injured players anguishing in some form or fashion.





Back to top
  Replies (0)
volfan30
Member since Jun 2010
27622 posts

re: How much talent did the Trailblazers have? How big of a dissapointment were they


quote:

Portlands starting 5 is very very good, led by LA down low and the rookie of the year at PG.

Batum is a stud with a solid all around game, Hickson is good for what he is asked to do as a 5th option when they are all on the floor, and Mathews can shoot it.

If they had a couple of bench players they're a 5-6 seed team.









Back to top
  Replies (0)


Back to top