Started By
Message
locked post

1000 post minimum to start a thread

Posted on 1/23/13 at 10:04 am
Posted by Jim Rockford
Member since May 2011
98064 posts
Posted on 1/23/13 at 10:04 am
It's time, at least on the Rant.
Posted by Hugo Stiglitz
Member since Oct 2010
72937 posts
Posted on 1/23/13 at 10:11 am to
Seems a little high.
Posted by OneMoreTime
Florida Gulf Coast Fan
Member since Dec 2008
61834 posts
Posted on 1/23/13 at 10:12 am to
Not high enough, imo
Posted by Jim Rockford
Member since May 2011
98064 posts
Posted on 1/23/13 at 10:12 am to
500 then. Something to keep the driveby negatigers at bay.
Posted by hashtag
Comfy, AF
Member since Aug 2005
27463 posts
Posted on 1/23/13 at 10:18 am to
- 10 posts required in Help Board before allowed to post in any other board (this will force users to see Help Board stickied threads and let them ask the stupid questions they should there)
- 1000 posts required before alloowed to start a thread
Posted by Jim Rockford
Member since May 2011
98064 posts
Posted on 1/23/13 at 10:19 am to
I like it.
Posted by Chicken
Jackassistan
Member since Aug 2003
21913 posts
Posted on 1/23/13 at 10:21 am to
think through this idea some more and then you will realize how bad of an idea it is...
Posted by TH03
Mogadishu
Member since Dec 2008
171024 posts
Posted on 1/23/13 at 10:24 am to
terrible threads and low post counts are not mutually exclusive.

example: you have almost 20k posts and this is a terrible thread
Posted by genro
Member since Nov 2011
61788 posts
Posted on 1/23/13 at 10:24 am to
Are you implying threads will get more cluttered with a bunch of meaningless posts by people trying to inflate their count?
Posted by genro
Member since Nov 2011
61788 posts
Posted on 1/23/13 at 10:25 am to
quote:

Are you implying threads will get more cluttered with a bunch of meaningless posts by people trying to inflate their count?

Hmm...
Posted by genro
Member since Nov 2011
61788 posts
Posted on 1/23/13 at 10:25 am to
I'm starting to think so.
Posted by genro
Member since Nov 2011
61788 posts
Posted on 1/23/13 at 10:25 am to
quote:

I'm starting to think so.

This.
Posted by hashtag
Comfy, AF
Member since Aug 2005
27463 posts
Posted on 1/23/13 at 10:26 am to
quote:

think through this idea some more and then you will realize how bad of an idea it is...



I think only allowing threads to be started in the Help Board prior to reaching some milestone would be a good idea. Requiring a user to have 10 posts in the Help Board would at least force them to see the Help Board and might keep some of the dumb questions over here.

What issues do you see with this, Chicken?
Posted by PapaPogey
Baton Rouge
Member since Apr 2008
39390 posts
Posted on 1/23/13 at 10:26 am to
quote:

think through this idea some more and then you will realize how bad of an idea it is...


Right. Users will start shitting all over every thread in order to reach whatever number of posts that is required to start a thread of their own. The idea sounded good in principal, but it's a lose lose situation in the end.
Posted by hashtag
Comfy, AF
Member since Aug 2005
27463 posts
Posted on 1/23/13 at 10:26 am to
quote:

Are you implying threads will get more cluttered with a bunch of meaningless posts by people trying to inflate their count?



do we not have moderators? you can just ban people for doing this.
Posted by snake23
NOLA/BR
Member since Dec 2011
4438 posts
Posted on 1/23/13 at 10:29 am to
quote:

you have almost 20k posts and this is a terrible thread

Exactly. The worst threads are generally started by the people who have a shite ton of posts and think that they are awesome
Posted by genro
Member since Nov 2011
61788 posts
Posted on 1/23/13 at 10:30 am to
quote:

do we not have moderators? you can just ban people for doing this.

There are more subtle ways of doing it than I just did.

Like, say, every once in a while find a funny thread and just respond with

Are we going to ban everyone now who responds with only ? Or is there gonna be a cap on how often you can do that? It just wouldn't work.
Posted by hashtag
Comfy, AF
Member since Aug 2005
27463 posts
Posted on 1/23/13 at 10:37 am to
quote:

Are we going to ban everyone now who responds with only ? Or is there gonna be a cap on how often you can do that? It just wouldn't work.

you act like there aren't thousands upon thousands of message boards that require a certain number of posts prior to being able to start your own thread.
Posted by PapaPogey
Baton Rouge
Member since Apr 2008
39390 posts
Posted on 1/23/13 at 10:38 am to
quote:

Exactly. The worst threads are generally started by the people who have a shite ton of posts and think that they are awesome

DING DING DING! we have a WINNER!
Posted by Tiger1242
Member since Jul 2011
31868 posts
Posted on 1/23/13 at 10:42 am to
quote:

Are you implying threads will get more cluttered with a bunch of meaningless posts by people trying to inflate their count?


Isn't that what the OT is for? I keep trying to figure out why people post in there so often
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram