Leading With Your Helmet: Only A Penalty for Defenses | TigerDroppings.com

Posted byMessage
Lafayette VooDoo
New Orleans Saints Fan
Lafayette, Louisiana
Member since May 2011
602 posts

Leading With Your Helmet: Only A Penalty for Defenses


Because Jacquizz Rodgers from the Atlanta Falcons sure as Hell lowered his head to lead with the crown of his helmet to run over Earl Thomas.

Or is it just me?

You be the judge...







Back to top
Share:
Chad504boy
New Orleans Saints Fan
Five Oh Four
Member since Feb 2005
76584 posts

re: Leading With Your Helmet: Only A Penalty for Defenses


I judge you to be stupid.





Back to top
Hugo Stiglitz
USA Fan
Disregard Monarchy, Acquire Chicken
Member since Oct 2010
55750 posts

re: Leading With Your Helmet: Only A Penalty for Defenses


I thought the same thing when it happened.

It really is a double standard that a runner with the ball can use his helmet as a weapon but if a defender does it, it's a penalty.

Unfortunately, there really is no solution for this without weakening the game or making it more dangerous.

sucks.






Back to top
Hugo Stiglitz
USA Fan
Disregard Monarchy, Acquire Chicken
Member since Oct 2010
55750 posts

re: Leading With Your Helmet: Only A Penalty for Defenses


this is also on the wrong board.





Back to top
9th life
LSU Fan
Boringham
Member since Sep 2009
864 posts

re: Leading With Your Helmet: Only A Penalty for Defenses


i'll agree that if the roles were reversed, then rogers would be the one on his arse and 15 yards would be tacked onto the end of the run.

that said, i think it is a stupid rule and shouldn't be called at the professional level.






Back to top
JDat
New Iberia, LA
Member since Nov 2011
215 posts

re: Leading With Your Helmet: Only A Penalty for Defenses


I agree with you that the rules on hitting have gottten out of hand. The issue is that Thomas was not "defenseless"

You can hit a reciever or rb while they are running. Sometimes just depends who's wearing the white cap that day.






Back to top
F machine
New Orleans Saints Fan
Member since Jun 2009
11885 posts

re: Leading With Your Helmet: Only A Penalty for Defenses


quote:

I agree with you that the rules on hitting have gottten out of hand. The issue is that Thomas was not "defenseless"


Yeah, it's called a penalty because the offensive player is "defenseless". Kind of hard to be defenseless if you're trying to tackle someone.






Back to top
Lafayette VooDoo
New Orleans Saints Fan
Lafayette, Louisiana
Member since May 2011
602 posts

re: Leading With Your Helmet: Only A Penalty for Defenses


quote:

You can hit a reciever or rb while they are running. Sometimes just depends who's wearing the white cap that day.


Exactly.

And I think it's a dumb rule that should not be called unless a player launches themselves at another player.






Back to top
Lafayette VooDoo
New Orleans Saints Fan
Lafayette, Louisiana
Member since May 2011
602 posts

re: Leading With Your Helmet: Only A Penalty for Defenses


quote:

I judge you to be stupid.


Says the guy with Colin Kaepernick as his pic.






Back to top
Chad504boy
New Orleans Saints Fan
Five Oh Four
Member since Feb 2005
76584 posts

re: Leading With Your Helmet: Only A Penalty for Defenses


you mad cause he's so sexy.





Back to top
htran90
New Orleans Saints Fan
belle chasse
Member since Dec 2012
3274 posts

re: Leading With Your Helmet: Only A Penalty for Defenses


imagine someone like AD running at you full blast head down and you're just standing there in his way. his momentum against you is just as equivalent to a linebacker running full speed with his head down.

I'd want to cry if I was that someone getting steamrolled by AD though. lol






Back to top
NorthGwinnettTiger
Auburn Fan
Jay Prosch Fan Club: President/CEO
Member since Jun 2006
33335 posts

re: Leading With Your Helmet: Only A Penalty for Defenses




quote:

Earl Thomas






Back to top
BarbeTiger
New Orleans Saints Fan
Mr. White's Lab Yo
Member since Jan 2012
4959 posts

re: Leading With Your Helmet: Only A Penalty for Defenses


MSB





Back to top
Breesus
New Orleans Saints Fan
House of the Rising Sun
Member since Jan 2010
23312 posts

re: Leading With Your Helmet: Only A Penalty for Defenses


quote:

Says the guy with Colin Kaepernick as his pic.


Dont try and argue with Chad, especially in an argument over stupidity. He will destroy you. Guaranteed.






Back to top
Pendulum
New Orleans Saints Fan
NOLA
Member since Jan 2009
1756 posts

re: Leading With Your Helmet: Only A Penalty for Defenses


I don't believe helmet to helmet contact is a penalty between a runner and a tackler.

It's only helmet to helmet between tackler and defenseless players (i.e. catching the ball) or qb's that gets flagged.

That's why pierre thomas getting his face demolished by whitner wasn't a penalty.

Guess I could be wrong though, they try to get so specific with rules these days and it just leads to a more confusing, controversial outcome. A perfect example of this is contact between ball and ground on a catch. I think if the ball touches ground before possession is maintained, no catch. All this "well it moved" "he had control through ground" bull shite is getting old. Just have clear cut rules and deal with the downside of that imo, at least that way it is the same for everyone





This post was edited on 1/14 at 5:45 pm


Back to top



Back to top