Started By
Message
locked post

SI: Numbers show that Harbaugh will live to regret benching Smith for Kaepernick

Posted on 1/10/13 at 6:19 pm
Posted by Bench McElroy
Member since Nov 2009
33906 posts
Posted on 1/10/13 at 6:19 pm
quote:



We track what we call Correlation to Victory each week and each season at CHFF Insider. And it tells us that teams with the higher passer rating -- what we call Passer Rating Differential -- consistently win more than 80 percent of all NFL games. And they win more often as the games get bigger and more important.

Teams with a higher passer rating:
• went 209-46 (.820) in 2012
• are an incredible 47-5 (.904) since Week 15
• went 4-0 (1.000) in the wild-card round

That brings us back to the Smith-Kaepernick debate. The 49ers have continued to win: they went 6-2-1 with Smith the starter; 5-2 with Kaepernick, highlighted by a 41-34 victory at New England. Conveniently, the 24-24 tie against the Rams was the game in which Smith suffered his concussion, opening the door for Kaepernick to take over the No. 1 job.

But the team's passing efficiency has in fact taken a step backward since Smith was benched.

• Smith: 70.2 percent, 8.0 YPA, 13 TD, 5 INT, 104.1 rating
• Kaepernick: 62.4 percent, 8.3 YPA, 10 TD, 3 INT, 98.3 rating



LINK
This post was edited on 1/10/13 at 10:50 pm
Posted by dgtiger3
Prairieville
Member since Sep 2005
5698 posts
Posted on 1/10/13 at 6:21 pm to
:kige:
Posted by Stagg8
Houston
Member since Jan 2005
12985 posts
Posted on 1/10/13 at 6:23 pm to
So how do Kaepernick's numers compare to Smith's second year in the league? It's simple really... you play the younger guy with the ridiculously high ceiling still in his rookie contract over the 7th year guy in the final year of his contract. It doesn't hurt that Kaepernick's QBR is one of the top in the league in his 7 starts.
Posted by retooc
Freeport, FL
Member since Sep 2012
7431 posts
Posted on 1/10/13 at 6:25 pm to
I think it probably will hurt them this year. Although I would be picking GB regardless of the QB for the niners.
Posted by Sl4m
Baton Rouge
Member since Apr 2012
3717 posts
Posted on 1/10/13 at 6:28 pm to
Kaepernick is a better commitment for the future, he simply has more potential, he's much more aggressive with his play.
Posted by Tiger1242
Member since Jul 2011
31854 posts
Posted on 1/10/13 at 6:30 pm to
quote:

Kaepernick is a better commitment for the future, he simply has more potential, he's much more aggressive with his play.



Well wtf are they doing building for the future when they have a great shot to win a Super Bowl this year?
Posted by brg0320
Member since May 2009
3295 posts
Posted on 1/10/13 at 6:32 pm to
I think Alex Smith is a better option at QB THIS YEAR than Colin Kaepernick. I guess if SF doesn't care about having the best guy for a chance at winning a Super Bowl this year, then they have made the correct choice.

With that being said, I don't think Alex Smith will succeed anywhere else. SF was the perfect fit for him once Harbaugh came in.
Posted by dukke v
PLUTO
Member since Jul 2006
202455 posts
Posted on 1/10/13 at 6:37 pm to
quote:

Although I would be picking GB regardless of the QB for the niners


I will take thye Pack with K starting. I would take the Niners if Smith was STILL starting. I think Harbaugh made a HUGE mistake.The biggest advantadge that the niners have is that the Pack CAN'T run the ball.
Posted by RemouladeSawce
Uranus
Member since Sep 2008
13890 posts
Posted on 1/10/13 at 8:23 pm to
There is no way of knowing if it's the right decision or not. If the Niners lose Saturday under Kaepernick there's no guarantee Smith does any better. There is no point to second guessing.

All I know is in last year's NFCCG I watched the Niners offense go 1/13 on 3rd down and fall short after ample possessions to take control of the game.

So long as it's not inherently stupid (and this decision isn't) fortune often favors the bold.

This post was edited on 1/10/13 at 8:27 pm
Posted by RLDSC FAN
Rancho Cucamonga, CA
Member since Nov 2008
51339 posts
Posted on 1/10/13 at 8:27 pm to
It's funny to me how last year people were saying the niners will never win it all with Smith and peaked by getting to the NFC title game. Now this year we're hearing it was mistake to sit him and may cost them the SB
Posted by tigerpimpbot
Chairman of the Pool Board
Member since Nov 2011
66861 posts
Posted on 1/10/13 at 8:29 pm to
49ers scored 17 points last year at home in the NFC championship game.
Posted by TT9
Global warming
Member since Sep 2008
82952 posts
Posted on 1/10/13 at 8:38 pm to
They might get 17 Saturday night. Packers will roll.
Posted by Draconian Sanctions
Markey's bar
Member since Oct 2008
84763 posts
Posted on 1/10/13 at 8:40 pm to
quote:

It's funny to me how last year people were saying the niners will never win it all with Smith and peaked by getting to the NFC title game. Now this year we're hearing it was mistake to sit him and may cost them the SB


Yeah it's pretty hilarious
Posted by St Augustine
The Pauper of the Surf
Member since Mar 2006
64004 posts
Posted on 1/10/13 at 8:45 pm to
Yeah but It also seemed that Smith was playing even better this year. They were still just a couple of big frick ups from the SB
Posted by Chicken
Jackassistan
Member since Aug 2003
21884 posts
Posted on 1/10/13 at 10:43 pm to
Can you not paste so much of that article? 2-3 paragraphs max...thanks
Posted by Dr RC
The Money Pit
Member since Aug 2011
58023 posts
Posted on 1/11/13 at 1:56 am to
quote:

Well wtf are they doing building for the future when they have a great shot to win a Super Bowl this year?


thats exactly how I'd feel if I was a Niners fan. I really thought Smith had taken a great step forward this year.

Not to mention the move by Harbaugh will probably cause players to hide injuries for fear of losing their jobs.
This post was edited on 1/11/13 at 1:58 am
Posted by Sophandros
Victoria Concordia Crescit
Member since Feb 2005
45218 posts
Posted on 1/11/13 at 4:50 am to
Calling Cold Hard Football Facts statistical analysis is quite a reach. I'll leave it at for now.
Posted by tidalmouse
Whatsamotta U.
Member since Jan 2009
30706 posts
Posted on 1/11/13 at 6:18 am to
quote:

You play the younger guy with the ridiculously high ceiling still in his rookie contract over the 7th year guy in the final year of his contract


^^^ This.Harbaugh's no dummy.He rolling the dice a little bit.But he's getting the best of both worlds right now.His Team is winning,and his Rookie QB is getting valuable experience.


What up Chicken.
This post was edited on 1/11/13 at 6:22 am
Posted by Willie Stroker
Member since Sep 2008
12816 posts
Posted on 1/11/13 at 8:08 am to
Interesting that the author of the article limited the higher passer rating comparison to only this season. He had the data to go back a few years and expand the sample size for the data to be more meaningful - but didn't.

Part of the explanation for the difference is that most teams do not have 2 quarterbacks whose passer ratings are so similar. For most teams, it's a no - brainer as to who the better quarterback is. But in San Fran, the difference is a mere 5 points. It should also raise the question - Is that 5 point difference in passer rating more important than the extra threat Kaepernick provides with his feet? He does average a yard per carry more. In the author's middle school analysis, he does not even address that.

I give the article thumbs down. He was trying too hard to make a statistical case for a viewpoint that has little to no statistical significance.

He says the team with the better passing rating usually wins. Well regardless of which San Fran QB starts, Green Bay has the better passer rating and Rodgers has a better rating than either SF QB.
Posted by Stagg8
Houston
Member since Jan 2005
12985 posts
Posted on 1/12/13 at 10:21 pm to
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram