Started By
Message
locked post

Should the juicers get into the Baseball HoF?

Posted on 1/9/13 at 9:28 am
Posted by MonroeTiger80
Member since Dec 2004
523 posts
Posted on 1/9/13 at 9:28 am
Bonds, Sosa, Clemens all up for their first ballot into the hall. None is expected to get the 75% voted needed today to go in. Should they get in?

IMO if Lance Armstrong is going to have his SEVEN Tour de France titles vacated, then no one who evidence shows was likely on the juice should be put in a Hall of Fame in any sport. They are cheats.

Additionally, if it were left up to me, any record set during the Steroid Era by anyone suspected of juicing would have an asterisk by it denoting it was a Steroid Era record.
This post was edited on 1/9/13 at 9:29 am
Posted by memphstigers23
Fenway Pahk
Member since Mar 2012
10278 posts
Posted on 1/9/13 at 9:29 am to
No. And they won't.
Posted by DeltaDoc
The Delta
Member since Jan 2008
16089 posts
Posted on 1/9/13 at 9:32 am to
Yes...most of the players of that era were juicing...they were the best of those that juiced. Moreover, Sosa, Bonds and Clemens never tested positive.

I can understand keeping Palmeiro out because he tested positive after the drugs were banned.

Basically all of the challengers to Lance Armstrong have also tested positive for banned substances. He was the best rider in the world...and they were all cheating. There have been physiological test on Armstrong that indicate his heart and lung capacity make him a genetic freak. Take the drugs away from everyone and he would have been the best. He evened the playing field by cheating.
Posted by NorthGwinnettTiger
Member since Jun 2006
51802 posts
Posted on 1/9/13 at 9:32 am to
No. And it's fricked up Dale Murphy isn't getting in.
Posted by barry
Location, Location, Location
Member since Aug 2006
50335 posts
Posted on 1/9/13 at 9:49 am to
quote:

Yes...most of the players of that era were juicing.


O really?

Proof?
Posted by Black n Gold
Member since Feb 2009
15405 posts
Posted on 1/9/13 at 9:51 am to
Juice doesn't help your hand-eye coordination
Posted by Smokedawg
Finding Lennay Kekua
Member since Dec 2008
5401 posts
Posted on 1/9/13 at 9:53 am to
quote:

Additionally, if it were left up to me, any record set during the Steroid Era by anyone suspected of juicing would have an asterisk by it denoting it was a Steroid Era record.

Bagwell might get in hopefully
Posted by DeltaDoc
The Delta
Member since Jan 2008
16089 posts
Posted on 1/9/13 at 9:54 am to
quote:

Proof?


Do you have proof that Bonds, Sosa and Clemens juiced?
Posted by MonroeTiger80
Member since Dec 2004
523 posts
Posted on 1/9/13 at 9:57 am to
quote:

Juice doesn't help your hand-eye coordination



This post was edited on 1/9/13 at 9:59 am
Posted by Rickety Cricket
Premium Member
Member since Aug 2007
46883 posts
Posted on 1/9/13 at 9:59 am to
quote:

Do you have proof that Bonds, Sosa and Clemens juiced?

Posted by barry
Location, Location, Location
Member since Aug 2006
50335 posts
Posted on 1/9/13 at 10:00 am to
quote:

Do you have proof that Bonds,



Are you joking? Ugh the balco trial where he admitted to using the cream and the clear, he said he just didn't know it was steroids

quote:

Clemens


Brian Mcnamee

quote:

Sosa


2003 MLB drug test that were released.
Posted by MonroeTiger80
Member since Dec 2004
523 posts
Posted on 1/9/13 at 10:00 am to
quote:

Do you have proof that Bonds, Sosa and Clemens juiced?





This post was edited on 1/9/13 at 10:03 am
Posted by Baloo
Formerly MDGeaux
Member since Sep 2003
49645 posts
Posted on 1/9/13 at 10:03 am to
Absolutely. It wasn't against the rules and was actively encouraged by the clubs and studiously ignored by the writers. Then we turn around and damn them all to hell. It's hypocritical.

And we have cheaters in the Hall, and more than our share of drug users. Hell, Koufax got steroid injections (not anabolic, and it was related to surgery). The entire 50s and 60s generation was addicted to greenies.

Whatever. It's not hard to look at an era, see the distorted effect, and make a discount for context. No, 500 HR doesn't mean as much in the 1990s, but it's not meaningLESS. Much like a 2.50 ERA in the 60s. Or a 300 batting average in the 30s. Context has always changed throughout baseball history.
Posted by Pilot Tiger
North Carolina
Member since Nov 2005
73140 posts
Posted on 1/9/13 at 10:05 am to
if we're calling the 90's and early 2000's the steroid era, then the writers need to accept that and vote for players who were the best of their era

not act like hypocrites
Posted by barry
Location, Location, Location
Member since Aug 2006
50335 posts
Posted on 1/9/13 at 10:05 am to
quote:

It wasn't against the rules


It wasn't against the rules to use illegal drugs?

Come on Baloo.

I'm not saying i wouldn't vote them in, except Sosa.
Posted by oleyeller
Vols, Bitch
Member since Oct 2012
32015 posts
Posted on 1/9/13 at 10:09 am to
Hell no! And i dont like the excuse that if most in this era were doing it they should get in. That doesnt make it right, its still cheating and not fair to anyone before them that done it the right way. Cheating is cheating, why the hell wouldnt one of the best ever pete rose cant get in and he didnt even cheat himself playing the sport!
Posted by Baloo
Formerly MDGeaux
Member since Sep 2003
49645 posts
Posted on 1/9/13 at 10:10 am to
No, it wasn't. In fact, Fay Vincent wrote a memo in the early 90s to consider changing the rules, but it never got passed by the owners. Baseball considered changing the rules regarding steroids AND REFUSED TO DO SO.

Kirby Puckett actually broke the law (aggravated assault). He's in the Hall, and was elected by this group of writers recently.
Posted by barry
Location, Location, Location
Member since Aug 2006
50335 posts
Posted on 1/9/13 at 10:10 am to
quote:

he entire 50s and 60s generation was addicted to greenies.


70's and 80's
Posted by Baloo
Formerly MDGeaux
Member since Sep 2003
49645 posts
Posted on 1/9/13 at 10:10 am to
They were addicted to cocaine.
Posted by barry
Location, Location, Location
Member since Aug 2006
50335 posts
Posted on 1/9/13 at 10:11 am to
quote:

. In fact, Fay Vincent wrote a memo in the early 90s to consider changing the rules, but it never got passed by the owners. Baseball considered changing the rules regarding steroids AND REFUSED TO DO SO.


MLB has no authority to make steroids legal.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram