- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Reviews from the Hobbit are coming in; 68% right now
Posted on 12/5/12 at 1:40 pm to White Shadeaux
Posted on 12/5/12 at 1:40 pm to White Shadeaux
quote:
That's why they did an end-around with the ROTK appendices stuff in The Hobbit, which includes some Silmarillion info.
You think Sauron will be in the 3rd movie with the appendices?
1
Posted on 12/5/12 at 1:47 pm to Fearthehat0307
quote:
all i can comment on so far is the 3 lotr movies and hobbit previews.
in which you troll on them.
This post was edited on 12/5/12 at 1:49 pm
Posted on 12/5/12 at 2:16 pm to CP3LSU25
quote:
You think Sauron will be in the 3rd movie with the appendices?
Sauron will be in all 3 of these movies in some fashion.
He's the Necromancer from the book.
These movies will also be set against the backdrop of him coming to form and gaining strength again, and why Gandalf thought it was necessary to help a band of greedy dwarves regain their treasure/kingdom in the first place.
Let me know when you get the Silmarillion.
Posted on 12/5/12 at 2:20 pm to White Shadeaux
which third of the book does the White Council drive him out of Dol Guldur? early middle late? i'm wondering when we'll see this. the absence of specifics about this from the book is my biggest disappointment with the Hobbit
Posted on 12/5/12 at 2:24 pm to manwich
The only bad thing after watching the film we will all be dying to see the trailer from the next movie. It killed me to wait and see the Two Towers trailer the following year which was amazing 
Posted on 12/5/12 at 2:28 pm to CP3LSU25
i remember being awed by the opening scene of TTT on opening night.
flying along the snowy mountain ridge hearing the roars from inside and then diving into one and seeing the Gandalf/Balrog battle sequence...
i could have done without the Ian MacGandalf nudie acid trip
flying along the snowy mountain ridge hearing the roars from inside and then diving into one and seeing the Gandalf/Balrog battle sequence...
i could have done without the Ian MacGandalf nudie acid trip
Posted on 12/5/12 at 2:38 pm to manwich
Everyone's getting in on the The Hobbit buzz. Easily the most anticipated movie of the year. 4 covers for Entertainment Weekly out this week.
Posted on 12/5/12 at 2:44 pm to CP3LSU25
that smeagol cover does not promote the movie well. that's the stuff nightmares are made of. they could've done without that one 
Posted on 12/5/12 at 2:50 pm to Fearthehat0307
quote:
that smeagol cover does not promote the movie well. that's the stuff nightmares are made of. they could've done without that one
He does look very bulimic in that picture.
Posted on 12/5/12 at 7:50 pm to CP3LSU25
quote:
Damn!! Morgoth must be a badass
Dude, Morgoth had Balrogs for bodyguards!
The book also had some really badass elves. Some that make Legolas look like Peter Pan
Posted on 12/6/12 at 7:17 am to JohnnyBgood
@manwhich.
Met too. I had a chub the whole time
Met too. I had a chub the whole time
Posted on 12/6/12 at 8:26 am to manwich
quote:
i could have done without the Ian MacGandalf nudie acid trip
Posted on 12/6/12 at 8:33 am to JohnnyBgood
76%
Posted on 12/6/12 at 9:21 am to WeBleedCrimson
quote:
76%
Posted on 12/6/12 at 9:40 am to hiltacular
Needs to get to 80. 
GET IT UP GET IT UP
GET IT UP GET IT UP
Posted on 12/6/12 at 11:07 am to CP3LSU25
Also got to keep in mind how much shite the movie is getting for killing all those animals during production. Most critics are liberal tree huggers and will write a bad review out of spite.
Posted on 12/6/12 at 11:12 am to JohnnyBgood
THIS
And the negatives from people who don't like the 48 FPS technology.
And, comparing it to the other films.
And the negatives from people who don't like the 48 FPS technology.
And, comparing it to the other films.
Posted on 12/6/12 at 11:13 am to White Shadeaux
quote:catch me up to speed. i thought he opted to go with the traditional speed after all the complaints. is the 48 just on the 3d version?
And the negatives from people who don't like the 48 FPS technology.
Posted on 12/6/12 at 11:16 am to manwich
It was filmed at 48 FPS.
The thing is, only about 1,000 theaters have the technology to show it that way. So if yours does not, you shouldn't see any difference.
I think most reviews so far have been in tech-laden cinema venues, and there have been some complaints.
The thing is, only about 1,000 theaters have the technology to show it that way. So if yours does not, you shouldn't see any difference.
I think most reviews so far have been in tech-laden cinema venues, and there have been some complaints.
Posted on 12/6/12 at 12:15 pm to JohnnyBgood
quote:
Also got to keep in mind how much shite the movie is getting for killing all those animals during production. Most critics are liberal tree huggers and will write a bad review out of spite.
Never thought about that. Another reason liberals should leave america. What are the % of critics from California?
Page 10 of 20
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News