Liberalism is built entirely on a foundation of hypocricy. They cry out all kinds of "isms" where one particular group of people are wronged by white men.
This is more or less the vehicle in which we are force fed socialism.....and not all liberals are like that. You can take advantage of emotional or insecure people that way.
What is interesting is when you realize that all the liberal solutions to these wrongs involve white men having to do something. To me this is the ultimate form of elitism.
Not all liberals. This is more or less prevalent in the disfunctional urban cores in the northeast, mid west, and south. A liberal from Chicago (like our president), Memphis, New Orleans, or Detroit is not the same as one from Boston, Seattle, or San Fran.
If a woman feels like she is being underpaid, why not go start her own company and hire and pay who and what she wants to? Some very successful women have done this in the past. If there is inequality, its obviously because there a lot of men out there who believe women cannot do the same job as a man as effectively. If this is the case shouldnt women be motivated to prove those people wrong?
I'm not saying sexism or racism doesn't exist, but she's obviously using it as a crutch. Lots of people throw around "sexism" or "racism" to justify the achievement gap that is so obvious in America. It's much easier than actually addressing the real causes of the achievement gap.
The same person might look at a transitioning neighborhood in a large city and see massive urban decay and automatically blame "white flight" on racism instead of trying to understand real reasons why those people left in the first place or why it is so important that they not leave in search for Galt's Gulch in the suburbs.
This post was edited on 11/29 at 3:07 pm