Petraeus knew "almost immediately" | Page 7 | TigerDroppings.com

Posted byMessage
LSUgusto
Member since May 2005
16410 posts

re: Petraeus knew "almost immediately"


quote:

you should, but you never will. welcome to tigerdroppings poli board. a lot like the hotel california.


Well put!







Back to top
  Replies (0)
Argyl Sochs
Member since Nov 2012
34 posts

re: Petraeus knew "almost immediately"


quote:

I stand by my posts


Without researching your history, may I assume you believe the attacks to be the result of a spontaneous protest?






Back to top
  Replies (0)
Wolfhound45
LSU Fan
Member since Nov 2009
19801 posts

re: Petraeus knew "almost immediately"


quote:

nothing about Social Security/Medicare/Medicaid is CLEARLY UNEQUIVOCAL


See? We can all do that.



If we are attacked in the Middle East in 2012, it will be tied to radical Islam. Count on it.






Back to top
  Replies (0)
intel
Member since Nov 2012
27 posts

re: Petraeus knew "almost immediately"


If I were you I would get new sources for information. Now that you know how bad the one's you had are.





Back to top
  Replies (0)
ljhog
Arkansas Fan
Lake Jackson, Tx.
Member since Apr 2009
10202 posts

re: Petraeus knew "almost immediately"


quote:

Benghazi attack was linked to terrorists

so did everyone else on the planet with half a brain. then there was susan rice.






Back to top
  Replies (0)
los angeles tiger
LSU Fan
1,601 miles from Tiger Stadium
Member since Oct 2003
55976 posts

re: Petraeus knew "almost immediately"


quote:

on a subject that it's painfully obvious most people don't give two shits about.

that is a fact.


Really? You know this for a fact.

You know, for a fact, that if you were child were murdered, would you feel it nice to hear from the police that "no one really gives a shite and that's a fact." You are so thoughtless in posting your hackish nonsense to defend this asswipe of a man that now sits in the oval office that is covering up when 4 Americans are dead. He bragged about bin laden and you along with others defended his bragging. Well, this is what comes with getting credit, responsibility for lying to the American people to cover up something, either the ineptness or something much worse.






Back to top
baybeefeetz
Eastern Michigan Fan
the now
Member since Sep 2009
14624 posts
 Online 

re: Petraeus knew "almost immediately"


Omg yOu are so dramatic. I was talking about the public not caring whether this began as a video protest or was a premeditated attack unrelated to the video. It's obvious at this point that even if people are pissed about lies from the WH (and of course people are upset about the deaths), it would have made no difference what the cause of the attack was. Let me be very clear for you, since you obviously have a hard time understanding: the white house didn't need to lie. Wouldn't have made a difference.


The fact that you interpreted my statement as though I was saying nobody cared about the deaths says a lot about you. You need to run a check.



This post was edited on 11/17 at 6:03 am


Back to top
NC_Tigah
LSU Fan
Member since Sep 2003
53631 posts

re: Petraeus knew "almost immediately"


quote:

the white house didn't need to lie. Wouldn't have made a difference.
But they did lie.
Profusely.

They did it in the run-up to an election that appeared in the bag. They took a major risk. They took what appears to be a totally unnecessary risk. Yet they chose to do it, and chose to lie.

The facts are the facts.
Decatur's sad tired remonstrations aside, Susan Rice stepped on to the stage, did the President's bidding, and willfully lied to the public. Have to admire her moxie as well as the Obama administration's confidence that they owned the MSM. The question that should be asked is no longer "did the administration lie?"

They did.
It is painfully evident they did.

The question that should be asked is "why?"






Back to top
  Replies (0)
Good Times
LSU Fan
Hill top in Tn
Member since Nov 2007
8913 posts

re: Petraeus knew "almost immediately"


quote:

the white house didn't need to lie. Wouldn't have made a difference.


Their security had been reduced in spite of previous attacks on the consulate, and the British ambassador. The administration ignored the pleas from Ambassador Stevens for security, even the statement that a defense was not possible against the numerous radical militias in an unstable country.

The lies would: IMHO
1. Buy time until after the election
2. Sway the feelings of the sheeple that bought into the narrative that Al Qaeda was on the run.
3. Cover for failure to anticipate a 9/11 attack as a possibility. Or even a PROBABILITY since the White House and the CIA were aware of the infamous video long before the attack. They should have been ready for both spontaneous protests and/or attacks.






Back to top
  Replies (0)
los angeles tiger
LSU Fan
1,601 miles from Tiger Stadium
Member since Oct 2003
55976 posts

re: Petraeus knew "almost immediately"


quote:

The fact that you interpreted my statement as though I was saying nobody cared about the deaths says a lot about you. You need to run a check.



Who are you to determine such? Maybe you should do a better job of communicating what you mean. Of course, you really don't show much interest in to why Obama lied, but as others have already stated, maybe if you had paid attention to his and other dem leaders speeches at the dem convention, you would know they were bragging about Al Quaeda being non-existent because of his first four years. The truth hurt their narrative and therefore a lie was given. It was political because he didn't want this to hurt his image, which he placed above the lives of other Americans that had died.

Now GFO.







Back to top
baybeefeetz
Eastern Michigan Fan
the now
Member since Sep 2009
14624 posts
 Online 

re: Petraeus knew "almost immediately"


Yeah, dude, I understand why you think they lied. I have been here from the start. You are a liar, btw. Nobody has said aq was non existent.

And again, even as al Qaeda may be decimated, they and/or their affiliates can still strike. Everybody understands this. That's why the whole thing doesn't add up.

Plus frick you, you douche.



This post was edited on 11/17 at 8:35 am


Back to top
intel
Member since Nov 2012
27 posts

re: Petraeus knew "almost immediately"


And even more important than the lie put forth by this administration as a cover up, is the question of who denied the addtional security in the first place and who denied the assistance during the attack.





Back to top
nobodytooimportant
Member since Oct 2012
657 posts

re: Petraeus knew "almost immediately"


Question one, the state department has limited resources.

Question 2, no one ever denied assistance during the attack except in the right wing fantasy land






Back to top
  Replies (0)


Back to top