Started By
Message

re: New Twilight Movie

Posted on 11/15/12 at 3:18 pm to
Posted by CarRamrod
Spurbury, VT
Member since Dec 2006
57426 posts
Posted on 11/15/12 at 3:18 pm to
This movie is going to be so fricking good!
Posted by LSUTygerFan
Homerun Village
Member since Jun 2008
33232 posts
Posted on 11/15/12 at 3:24 pm to
quote:

This movie is going to be so fricking good!


Posted by TigerMan327
Elsewhere
Member since Feb 2011
5133 posts
Posted on 11/15/12 at 3:31 pm to
Why are people going to go sit in line all day?? My gf bought us tickets online 20 minutes ago and we will probably go 30 minutes early and get a good spot..

frickin nerds


Oh and the movies aren't bad but some of the shite is ridiculous. Kristen Stewart is a terrible fricking actress. She always looks constipated. One time in an interview she said something that when she is acting she just trys to be herself and that all acting should be like that.. If that were the case it wouldn't be considered "Acting" amirite?? She also blows in the new snow white. She just looks so weak and feeble in her movies and depressed all the time.

Edward (robert patterson) or whatever his name is is a good actor but the start of this series of movies was so dumb because little teen bitches thought he was the perfect boyfriend and super sweet and blah blahh..
The dude told her he wanted to eat her more than anything else and thats why he loves her. he also admitted to standing over her bed at night and watching her sleep before they even became friends or whatever.. Thats fricking creepy as shite...

Taylor Lautner (Jacob) or whatever his name is is also a terrible actor. I didn't realize it til I saw him in other movies, but he literally blows. Teenagers just love him cause he is ripped.

/end rant

lol sorry.

This post was edited on 11/15/12 at 3:38 pm
Posted by Sentrius
Fort Rozz
Member since Jun 2011
64757 posts
Posted on 11/15/12 at 3:34 pm to
quote:

New Twilight Movie




How many movies does this franchise have?!?!
Posted by TheBiggestSpur
Member since Oct 2012
1049 posts
Posted on 11/15/12 at 3:58 pm to
This the last Twilight movie (for now). Then Stephanie Meyer's is spitting out The Host next year. Justin imagine if the tale that the Scientology cult believes was real and add a shitty teen romance to it. That's The Host. The damn Hunger Games still has 3 movies left. How anyone can buy into an attractive chic who happens to be able to use a bow and arrow is a heroine is behind me. Ellen Ripley was a heroine. Katniss (frick this name) was a lost farm girl. Then we'll have the inevitable Fifty Shades of shite series. frick my life. Females from 13-25 are the shitties movie demographic out there and there's no debate.

As for Kirsten Stewart, she does have some acting ability, but damn she mailed it the frick in with these movies.
Posted by Fun Bunch
New Orleans
Member since May 2008
115345 posts
Posted on 11/15/12 at 4:04 pm to
I once read the plot details of the last book. It is the most ridiculous shite ever, complete with SPOILER a fricking vampire using his teeth to cut an umbilical cord.

I mean...jesus.
Posted by RollTide1987
Augusta, GA
Member since Nov 2009
64930 posts
Posted on 11/15/12 at 4:06 pm to
I'm not the biggest Kristen Stewart fan but I think she gets a lot of undeserved hate for Twilight. Her character in that film is so bland and weak that even some of the greatest actors of our generation couldn't pull it off. Bella Swan is that bad of a character.

I have seen Stewart in other films such as Adventureland, The Runaways, and On the Road. She's not half-bad, and she wasn't too bad in Snow White and the Huntsman either. She'll never be nominated for an Oscar, much less win one, but she isn't as bad of an actress as people claim.

Posted by Sentrius
Fort Rozz
Member since Jun 2011
64757 posts
Posted on 11/15/12 at 4:09 pm to
quote:

This the last Twilight movie (for now). Then Stephanie Meyer's is spitting out The Host next year. Justin imagine if the tale that the Scientology cult believes was real and add a shitty teen romance to it. That's The Host. The damn Hunger Games still has 3 movies left. How anyone can buy into an attractive chic who happens to be able to use a bow and arrow is a heroine is behind me. Ellen Ripley was a heroine. Katniss (frick this name) was a lost farm girl. Then we'll have the inevitable Fifty Shades of shite series. frick my life. Females from 13-25 are the shitties movie demographic out there and there's no debate.

As for Kirsten Stewart, she does have some acting ability, but damn she mailed it the frick in with these movies.



I agree.

quote:

Females from 13-25 are the shittiest movie demographic out there and there's no debate.


Yep.

Girl I'm friends with just popped up on my news-feed raving about going to see this. I told her she has crappy taste in movies. She's 22 FWIW.

But still this is a very profitable demographic for hollywood. So it's still a good business decision to go after this demographic.
Posted by RollTide1987
Augusta, GA
Member since Nov 2009
64930 posts
Posted on 11/15/12 at 4:12 pm to
I'm going to go ahead and say that Katniss Everdeen is a hundred times the character Bella Swan ever will be. The book explains why she's so bad arse and good with a bow. While the sequels aren't nearly as good as the original, especially the third one, I will always maintain that The Hunger Games trilogy EASILY blows Twilight out of the water.

Posted by SouljaBreauxTellEm
Mizz
Member since Aug 2009
29343 posts
Posted on 11/15/12 at 4:14 pm to
quote:

One time in an interview she said something that when she is acting she just trys to be herself and that all acting should be like that.. If that were the case it wouldn't be considered "Acting" amirite?? She also blows in the new snow white. She just looks so weak and feeble in her movies and depressed all the time.


Wow Kristen sounds dumb if that is the case. I understand she is probably just trying to say come off as natural and believable.. but you are right. A great actor.. does just that.. Acts the part.. depending upon the part. Kristen is basically saying she will never have any range.
Posted by Cold Pizza
Member since Sep 2011
7639 posts
Posted on 11/15/12 at 5:00 pm to
Posted by TheBiggestSpur
Member since Oct 2012
1049 posts
Posted on 11/15/12 at 5:08 pm to
quote:

But still this is a very profitable demographic for hollywood. So it's still a good business decision to go after this demographic.


True, but at the same time, I'd rather studios focus their resources on better ideas. There are only so many movie theater screens out there and I rather have an action film, a comedy, or hell let's try to make a decent horror flick than these shitfests.
Posted by TheBiggestSpur
Member since Oct 2012
1049 posts
Posted on 11/15/12 at 5:09 pm to
quote:

I'm going to go ahead and say that Katniss Everdeen is a hundred times the character Bella Swan ever will be. The book explains why she's so bad arse and good with a bow. While the sequels aren't nearly as good as the original, especially the third one, I will always maintain that The Hunger Games trilogy EASILY blows Twilight out of the water.



Katniss sucks. If Jennifer Lawrence wasn't one of the most frickable women on the planet, everyone would realize this. Being 100 times better than probably the worst female character ever ain't saying much.
Posted by RollTide1987
Augusta, GA
Member since Nov 2009
64930 posts
Posted on 11/15/12 at 5:16 pm to
quote:

Katniss sucks.


I can respect that opinion, especially when you consider the last two books in the trilogy, but she was a good character until she was ruined in the sequels. I was simply saying that comparing Bella Swan and Katniss Everdeen would be criminal.

Posted by TheBiggestSpur
Member since Oct 2012
1049 posts
Posted on 11/15/12 at 5:20 pm to
She was never a good character. Ever.
Posted by alajones
Huntsvegas
Member since Oct 2005
34445 posts
Posted on 11/15/12 at 7:51 pm to
If we are talking about Hunger Games now, I think that the idea behind it is dumb and the director to the first one should be fired. Is there any way to tell that it was shot in the same places as Last of the Mohicans?

As for Lawrence, I think she is an excellent actress, I don't get her sex appeal though. She's fit, young and a woman, so she is going to be attractive, but she is nothing special.

Posted by TigerMan327
Elsewhere
Member since Feb 2011
5133 posts
Posted on 11/15/12 at 8:17 pm to
This! She is an average chick in the real world. Nothing special
Posted by Negative Nomad
Hell
Member since Oct 2011
3173 posts
Posted on 11/15/12 at 11:30 pm to
This post was edited on 11/19/12 at 12:12 am
Posted by RLDSC FAN
Rancho Cucamonga, CA
Member since Nov 2008
51410 posts
Posted on 11/15/12 at 11:45 pm to
quote:

I've seen all 4. Not ashamed to admit it. I'm sure the movie board bullies will really hate me now.


probably not....those of us with significant others have been forced to watch them as well I don't mind going since my wife goes to all the films I want to see all year long but these films really do suck.
Posted by Scruffy
Kansas City
Member since Jul 2011
71994 posts
Posted on 11/16/12 at 12:34 am to
Holy crap. There are 4 movies? I thought we were only graced with 3 of these monstrosities.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram