- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
3-4 Defensive Scheme
Posted on 10/21/12 at 8:03 am
Posted on 10/21/12 at 8:03 am
It was interesting that one of our big defensive adjustments yesterday was to play a significant amount of 3-4.
Rather than analyzing the results from yesterday (which were obviously good), does anyone see us shifting more in that direction next year due to personnel and depth? It seems like after the DL exodus this year we will amazingly have more depth an experience at LB for the next couple years.
Thoughts?
Rather than analyzing the results from yesterday (which were obviously good), does anyone see us shifting more in that direction next year due to personnel and depth? It seems like after the DL exodus this year we will amazingly have more depth an experience at LB for the next couple years.
Thoughts?
Posted on 10/21/12 at 8:05 am to DaStain
Doubt it. That adjustment was made for aTm's offense specifically. Probably wouldn't benefit us very much at all against most SEC teams, especially Alleybama.
Posted on 10/21/12 at 8:06 am to DaStain
that was the mustang, not a 3-4. a 3-2-6. we've been running it for a while, that's just the most extensive use we've made of it this year.
we were actually in 3 man fronts before the announcers noticed, it just wasn't as noticeable with LBs at times lining up between the DL.
we were actually in 3 man fronts before the announcers noticed, it just wasn't as noticeable with LBs at times lining up between the DL.
Posted on 10/21/12 at 8:10 am to ATLTiger
It was a great adjustment by Chief. Dude's a great coach.
Posted on 10/21/12 at 8:11 am to DaStain
We ran nickel and dime package but had Eugene in the box a lot to help contain Johnny. We blitzed either him or a lb pretty often. Prolly won't see it much, that was specifically for aTm because of Johnny ability to get by our DL even when we have him contained. He's quick
This post was edited on 10/21/12 at 8:13 am
Posted on 10/21/12 at 8:13 am to ATLTiger
Gotcha. Not that anyone thinks we would go predominantly to a 3 down lineman scheme, just looking at the roster it begs the question of who will step up next year outside of Freak, Ego, and Rasco.
Young guys like Mickey, QT, Danielle Hunter, and incoming freshman will need to play a very big role.
Young guys like Mickey, QT, Danielle Hunter, and incoming freshman will need to play a very big role.
Posted on 10/21/12 at 8:19 am to countmystripes
quote:
Yeah, i never saw a 3-4.
It's just semantics. The 3-6-2 is a 3-4 with lighter faster personnel to match Tamu's personnel. In any event, it sure worked well.
I really am worried about the DT exodus next year and the lack of depth and recruiting at that position. Our success the last few years has been due to our owning the defensive interior line more than any other factor. Next year it will be Ego and Freak with Mickey Johnson and Quinten Thomas behind them. I expect a drop off.
Posted on 10/21/12 at 8:29 am to Penrod
Well, we don't know that Logan's leaving, and who's to say Ego or QT don't step up and become a force? No one saw Bennie coming last yr, or Brockers becoming the beast he did so fast
In Chief, Moffitt and Brick I trust.
In Chief, Moffitt and Brick I trust.
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News