Started By
Message
locked post

Segment on PTI - "Why can't LSU get a quarterback?"

Posted on 10/12/12 at 4:48 pm
Posted by Polar Bear
Member since Oct 2009
1800 posts
Posted on 10/12/12 at 4:48 pm
Musberger - "If LSU could just get a guy (QB) who could produce, they would be unbeatable".

Someone should remind the "analysts" that over half of our starting O-line is out...
Posted by saintsfan22
baton rouge
Member since May 2006
71485 posts
Posted on 10/12/12 at 4:49 pm to
quote:

Someone should remind the "analysts" that over half of our starting O-line is out...


And Kornheiser said he had been watching us intensely.
Posted by DollaChoppa
I Simp for ACC
Member since May 2008
84774 posts
Posted on 10/12/12 at 4:49 pm to
And our receivers have butterfingers
Posted by Jim Rockford
Member since May 2011
98128 posts
Posted on 10/12/12 at 4:49 pm to
quote:

Someone should remind the "analysts" that over half of our starting O-line is out...


True, but our QB problems predate our OL problems. It's a valid question. Hopefully the guys we have coming in next year will be the solution.
Posted by T1gerWonder
Member since May 2011
4449 posts
Posted on 10/12/12 at 4:50 pm to
They don't care, nor should we care what they say
Posted by RATeamWannabe
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2009
25943 posts
Posted on 10/12/12 at 4:50 pm to
Do you think we have a good quarterback?
Posted by BowDownToLSU
Livingston louisiana
Member since Feb 2010
19216 posts
Posted on 10/12/12 at 4:51 pm to
He should have said if LSU could get an OC
Posted by DrEdgeLSU
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Dec 2006
8164 posts
Posted on 10/12/12 at 4:51 pm to
quote:

Hopefully the guys we have coming in next year will be the solution.


Signed,

LSU fans in 2008, 2009, 2010, and 2011
Posted by cas4t
Member since Jan 2010
70889 posts
Posted on 10/12/12 at 4:51 pm to
I mean, our guy right now IS a UGA transfer. And after the last 4 years, it's a legit argument.
Posted by The Egg
Houston, TX
Member since Dec 2004
79110 posts
Posted on 10/12/12 at 4:52 pm to
it's a legit question that i don't expect those guys to dig too deep to find the answers to.
Posted by Toughcrittercrumb1
Houston
Member since Apr 2011
1084 posts
Posted on 10/12/12 at 4:52 pm to
Ponasky said the other day that there was about 6 dropped passes during the UF game. Mett was 11-25 and could have easily been 17-25 or better if drives would have continued. But the dropped balls have killed a lot of drives.
Posted by lsudaboss
Lafayette
Member since Jul 2010
843 posts
Posted on 10/12/12 at 4:53 pm to
Its unfair to write off mett already with line issues and drops
Posted by thunderbird1100
GSU Eagles fan
Member since Oct 2007
68289 posts
Posted on 10/12/12 at 4:55 pm to
I really dont get this perception that we still dont have a QB. We dont have any receivers this year, that's a problem. Our OL is awful, that's another problem this year.

Mett has been mostly on target and on point. He's made a few mistakes, but nothing. That isn't the problem.

People need to watch games before making stupid assertions. Put Peyton Manning back there, our offense is still awful due to receivers and OL.
Posted by Draconian Sanctions
Markey's bar
Member since Oct 2008
84831 posts
Posted on 10/12/12 at 4:55 pm to
quote:

Its unfair to write off mett already with line issues and drops




this
Posted by thunderbird1100
GSU Eagles fan
Member since Oct 2007
68289 posts
Posted on 10/12/12 at 4:56 pm to
quote:

Ponasky said the other day that there was about 6 dropped passes during the UF game. Mett was 11-25 and could have easily been 17-25 or better if drives would have continued. But the dropped balls have killed a lot of drives.



There was actually 5 dropped passes, but 4 of them would have been for 1st downs. Also, on 1 of his 11 completions (56 yards), it ended up being a fumble and turnover. Just an awful display by the receivers alltogether.
Posted by DollaChoppa
I Simp for ACC
Member since May 2008
84774 posts
Posted on 10/12/12 at 4:58 pm to
quote:

There was actually 5 dropped passes, but 4 of them would have been for 1st downs. Also, on 1 of his 11 completions (56 yards), it ended up being a fumble and turnover. Just an awful display by the receivers alltogether.



Aint that some shite
Posted by Polar Bear
Member since Oct 2009
1800 posts
Posted on 10/12/12 at 4:58 pm to
quote:

Do you think we have a good quarterback?


Yes. Or, more specifically, we have a good enough QB such that he doesn't bottleneck our offense.

With our porous (and now inexperienced) O-line, and unreliable receivers, I think we can say this is the first time in a few years where our QB has been the least of our concerns on the offensive side of the ball.
This post was edited on 10/12/12 at 5:00 pm
Posted by sheek
The Woodlands, TX
Member since Sep 2007
43891 posts
Posted on 10/12/12 at 5:01 pm to
quote:

There was actually 5 dropped passes, but 4 of them would have been for 1st downs. Also, on 1 of his 11 completions (56 yards), it ended up being a fumble and turnover. Just an awful display by the receivers alltogether.


I say we fire the receivers coach.
Posted by Hugo Stiglitz
Member since Oct 2010
72937 posts
Posted on 10/12/12 at 5:01 pm to
quote:

And our receivers have butterfingers


This.

Peyton Manning would look like shite with this offense.
Posted by cas4t
Member since Jan 2010
70889 posts
Posted on 10/12/12 at 5:02 pm to
Mett is an obvious upgrade. I think we all know if we had better receivers, this wouldn't even be a topic.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 5Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram