- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Terry Bradshaw Rips Brees & Saints
Posted on 10/10/12 at 8:24 pm to RandySavage
Posted on 10/10/12 at 8:24 pm to RandySavage
quote:
You serious? Have you paid attention to the direction football is moving? This record will be commonplace in 10 years.
By the time Drew is done the streak will be like 70 games....it wont be getting broke any time soon
0
Posted on 10/10/12 at 8:24 pm to LSUandAU
quote:
In reality, I think Brees would rather be 4-1 right now without getting the record, than vice versa!
That makes absolutely no sense. If Drew was relying on Mark Ingram more, we would be winning more? We had the most prolific passing attack in NFL history last year, why wouldnt we use it?
I guess if Drew wasn't being so selfish in Superbowl XLIV throwing those two touchdown passes chasing records, the Saints would have won...
Posted on 10/10/12 at 8:25 pm to LSUandAU
quote:
??In reality, I think Brees would rather be 4-1 right now without getting the record, than vice versa!
well no shite
This post was edited on 10/10/12 at 8:30 pm
Posted on 10/10/12 at 8:25 pm to undecided
Why start the thread of you're going to be a retarded troll in the rest of it.
how about offering a counter point
how about offering a counter point
Posted on 10/10/12 at 8:26 pm to RandySavage
quote:
You serious? Have you paid attention to the direction football is moving? This record will be commonplace in 10 years.
I don't know. Brees may extend it a bit. What active player has the second longest streak? Easier in a dome too...at least half your games.
Posted on 10/10/12 at 8:26 pm to RandySavage
I agree with Bradshaw on this point. These guys were suspended and not to have any contact, why is it allowed for Bree's to petition the NFL. If the NFL declines they're the "bad guys" if they give in they're not doing their job.
I get the record part of it, but what if it was the Cowboys asking this, would Saint fans be so quick to back the decision to ask?
I get the record part of it, but what if it was the Cowboys asking this, would Saint fans be so quick to back the decision to ask?
Posted on 10/10/12 at 8:26 pm to St Augustine
quote:
??In reality, I think Brees would rather be 4-1 right now without getting the record, than vice versa!
Oh I see, you realized how idiotic your statement originally was and changed it
Posted on 10/10/12 at 8:27 pm to sms151t
quote:
I agree with Bradshaw on this point. These guys were suspended and not to have any contact, why is it allowed for Bree's to petition the NFL. If the NFL declines they're the "bad guys" if they give in they're not doing their job.
They already were and still are the bad guys, don't blame Brees for Goodell being a pussy
Posted on 10/10/12 at 8:28 pm to REG861
Don't blame Goodell for this. Blame the Saints.
It was first brought up as salary cap deal which is the managements job to stop not the players.
It was first brought up as salary cap deal which is the managements job to stop not the players.
This post was edited on 10/10/12 at 8:30 pm
Posted on 10/10/12 at 8:29 pm to REG861
quote:
That makes absolutely no sense. If Drew was relying on Mark Ingram more, we would be winning more? We had the most prolific passing attack in NFL history last year, why wouldnt we use it?
I guess if Drew wasn't being so selfish in Superbowl XLIV throwing those two touchdown passes chasing records, the Saints would have won...
I am saying he would rather have team success than a personal record. You probably mis read...maybe I didn't word it well.
Posted on 10/10/12 at 8:29 pm to sms151t
quote:
I agree with Bradshaw on this point. These guys were suspended and not to have any contact, why is it allowed for Bree's to petition the NFL. If the NFL declines they're the "bad guys" if they give in they're not doing their job.
didn't really have much of a choice after the Gregg Williams debacle
Posted on 10/10/12 at 8:29 pm to sms151t
quote:
Don't blame Goodell for this. Blame the Saints.
For...? Having a prolific quarterback? Or for the the bounty fiasco? There's a big difference
Posted on 10/10/12 at 8:29 pm to sms151t
quote:
I agree with Bradshaw on this point. These guys were suspended and not to have any contact, why is it allowed for Bree's to petition the NFL. If the NFL declines they're the "bad guys" if they give in they're not doing their job.
I get the record part of it, but what if it was the Cowboys asking this, would Saint fans be so quick to back the decision to ask?
well...for starters, its assinine that Goodell can keep Payton, Loomis, and Vitt out of the Superdome as SPECTATORS.
Its not like Brees asked for them to be in the locker room or on the sidelines.
They were in a suite....doing nothing but watching.
Posted on 10/10/12 at 8:29 pm to RandySavage
quote:
You serious? Have you paid attention to the direction football is moving? This record will be commonplace in 10 years.
It's going to take a player over 3 years to reach the record as it stands now.
Who knows what number this record will end up as
Posted on 10/10/12 at 8:30 pm to sms151t
quote:
It was first brought up as salary cap deal which is the managements job to stop not the players.
Goodell has no authority over salary cap issues
Posted on 10/10/12 at 8:32 pm to TigerBait1127
The owners do and Goodell works for the owners.
Posted on 10/10/12 at 8:32 pm to LSUandAU
quote:
I don't know. Brees may extend it a bit. What active player has the second longest streak? Easier in a dome too...at least half your games.
Only 4 QBs are even in double-digits
Brees 48
Brady 37
Ryan 20
Manning 12
Yes, Brady being so close does diminish the wow factor of the record a little bit (as did him being so close in yards last year) but it is still an incredible record.
Posted on 10/10/12 at 8:32 pm to sms151t
quote:
I get the record part of it, but what if it was the Cowboys asking this, would Saint fans be so quick to back the decision to ask?
anyone who isn't a whiny bitch wouldn't care about a couple of guys sitting in the stands watching a guy they coached...regardless of whatever team they played for....I mean who gives one flying frick.
This post was edited on 10/10/12 at 8:34 pm
Posted on 10/10/12 at 8:33 pm to St Augustine
Its pretty clear that dude is just a butthurt Cowboy fan
Posted on 10/10/12 at 8:33 pm to REG861
quote:
Oh I see, you realized how idiotic your statement originally was and changed it
No...I like Brees and think he would rather have team success than individual success, but the way the record was handled seemed wrong to me...excessive...at the time. I understand what Terry is saying! AND I am being passive-aggressive again!
Page 4 of 7
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News