- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Would you choose a more wide open offense if it meant 1 more loss per year?
Posted on 10/9/12 at 10:19 pm
Posted on 10/9/12 at 10:19 pm
Let's say you were given the power to choose a scenario where over the next few years the Tigers would display a more high octane offense - long break away runs, great looking long pass completions, just a more asthetically pleasing O alltogether.
But, through some chain of cause and effect, this would come at the price of a single additional loss per year.
What would you choose?
But, through some chain of cause and effect, this would come at the price of a single additional loss per year.
What would you choose?
12
Posted on 10/9/12 at 10:20 pm to Methuselah
What a retarded hypothetical
No offense
No offense
Posted on 10/9/12 at 10:23 pm to KBeezy
None taken - if you answer it 
Posted on 10/9/12 at 10:23 pm to Methuselah
Legitimate question for some of the fricktards on this board
Posted on 10/9/12 at 10:24 pm to Methuselah
Do you mean all other things being equal, the offense would result in an extra loss per year? As in if they stayed with the current offense they go 12-0 but with the more wide open offense they go 11-1?
If so, I don't think anyone is claiming that. I at least just want an efficient offense that gives LSU the best chance at victory, an offense that will evolve if necessary to give the team its best opportunity for success. The product right now cannot be that.
If so, I don't think anyone is claiming that. I at least just want an efficient offense that gives LSU the best chance at victory, an offense that will evolve if necessary to give the team its best opportunity for success. The product right now cannot be that.
This post was edited on 10/9/12 at 10:25 pm
Posted on 10/9/12 at 10:24 pm to KBeezy
quote:
What a retarded hypothetical
No offense
this
and No. I want to win i dont care if that means running the option
This post was edited on 10/9/12 at 10:25 pm
Posted on 10/9/12 at 10:25 pm to KBeezy
quote:
What a retarded hypothetical
Offense intended
FIFY
Posted on 10/9/12 at 10:25 pm to Methuselah
Chances are that 1 more loss per year would be to someone who was clearly better on that day, so I guess I'd be okay with it.
Better than being pissed and frustrated wondering "what if" all the damn time.
Better than being pissed and frustrated wondering "what if" all the damn time.
Posted on 10/9/12 at 10:26 pm to Methuselah
quote:
Would you choose a more wide open offense if it meant 1 more loss per year?
God damn this is so fricking stupid.
Posted on 10/9/12 at 10:27 pm to Methuselah
I would not, I would rather us win games with a Georgia tech style offense if the end result was an undefeated season.
The reason I say that is because now I feel you have to go undefeated to be a nc contender.
Despite what everyone sAys, this is a legit question... Consider the amount of fans that are just there for entertainment.
Although I want the W
The reason I say that is because now I feel you have to go undefeated to be a nc contender.
Despite what everyone sAys, this is a legit question... Consider the amount of fans that are just there for entertainment.
Although I want the W
This post was edited on 10/9/12 at 10:29 pm
Posted on 10/9/12 at 10:27 pm to navy
quote:
so I guess I'd be okay with it
Unbelievable.. this board never ceases to amaze me
Posted on 10/9/12 at 10:28 pm to Methuselah
If we win every game IDGAF what the offense does. They could take a knee every play and if we win 2-0 I'll be happy
This post was edited on 10/9/12 at 10:28 pm
Posted on 10/9/12 at 10:28 pm to Methuselah
why even recruit on offense if we have to take one loss automatically.
Posted on 10/9/12 at 10:29 pm to WITNESS23
quote:
If we win every game IDGAF what the offense does
This isn't magic land. We can't have that happen if we suck on offense every game.
Posted on 10/9/12 at 10:30 pm to CP3LSU25
quote:
This isn't magic land.
Then it would be impossible to make a trade for better offense and 1 loss... All hypotheticals like this are magic land
Posted on 10/9/12 at 10:33 pm to WITNESS23
last year was magic land and it felt good up until.........
Posted on 10/9/12 at 10:34 pm to Methuselah
absofrickinglutely not...you are basically talking about the difference between bieng a good team and an elite team...1 automatic loss basically knocks you out of the national championship picture forever...
I don't care how whiny or pissy people get on this board, I want to win every damn game that we can possibly win by doing whatever it takes to do so....
I don't care how whiny or pissy people get on this board, I want to win every damn game that we can possibly win by doing whatever it takes to do so....
Posted on 10/9/12 at 10:36 pm to MetArl15
I want better offense and more wins.
It's certainly do-able.
It's certainly do-able.
This post was edited on 10/9/12 at 10:37 pm
Posted on 10/9/12 at 10:36 pm to Methuselah
You mean an offense something similar to West Virginia or some other "pass first" team?
If that's what you're suggesting, no thanks.
If that's what you're suggesting, no thanks.
Posted on 10/10/12 at 12:58 am to Methuselah
I think all fans would rather ugly wins than high scoring losses. But I just can't conceive a reason why a better offense would result in a worse team. A lot of posters here seem to think if the offense is good then the defense will suck, and I still can't figure out why this attitude is so prevalent here.
Page 1 of 2
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News