- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Recommend a New Offensive Scheme
Posted on 10/8/12 at 1:10 pm
Posted on 10/8/12 at 1:10 pm
We have a QB that's started 2 SEC games. Our offensive line is patchwork at best. Wide receivers can't catch the ball consistently. We're not taking care of the football.
What type of offensive scheme would work under these conditions?
What type of offensive scheme would work under these conditions?
16
Posted on 10/8/12 at 1:11 pm to Devious
Weak Side Option.
Posted on 10/8/12 at 1:12 pm to Devious
Bring in JJ to coach them up!
Posted on 10/8/12 at 1:12 pm to Devious
Air Raid
Posted on 10/8/12 at 1:12 pm to Devious
let's go all the way wildcat and let Jerrard Randall do some Michael Bishop stuff. word.
Posted on 10/8/12 at 1:12 pm to Devious
Spread...frick it.
Posted on 10/8/12 at 1:13 pm to Hugo Stiglitz
Wing T?
Notre Dame Box?
Notre Dame Box?
Posted on 10/8/12 at 1:14 pm to Devious
If we can work on execution and develop guys better we wouldn't have to although some misdirection needs to be used.
Posted on 10/8/12 at 1:15 pm to Devious
PUNT
Posted on 10/8/12 at 1:15 pm to Devious
Something less vanilla than ultra, pure vanilla.
Posted on 10/8/12 at 1:16 pm to Random LSU Hero
Misdirection/Play-action with a coordinator/HC that actually knows how to utilize such an offense.
Apparently $4 million per year only buys aptitude in one offensive scheme.
Playing a front seven loaded with future first round draft picks? "frick it," says Miles/Stud "Toss dive left."
Apparently $4 million per year only buys aptitude in one offensive scheme.
Playing a front seven loaded with future first round draft picks? "frick it," says Miles/Stud "Toss dive left."
This post was edited on 10/8/12 at 1:21 pm
Posted on 10/8/12 at 1:18 pm to UGATiger26
It's not the scheme, just don't be afraid to throw the ball across the middle. Throw in more play action and let Mett audible out when there are 8+ guys in the box
Posted on 10/8/12 at 1:29 pm to Devious
So, two say execute better, and the rest just spew bullshite?
Posted on 10/8/12 at 1:29 pm to Devious
Veer 
Posted on 10/8/12 at 1:38 pm to Broyota2
Spread it out with 4 WRs and a RB in the backfield. When your offense is spread out so much, it opens up natural running lanes for the RBs and natural lanes for WRs to get open. When everyone is in tight, like we usually are, the D has more people in tight, therefore we rely on a WR to beat his DB 1v1 , and that rarely happens. It also causes our OL to block more people in a smaller area, which usually ends up with clogged up holes and havoc.
When the offense is spread out, you run basic slants, hitches, smash routes, rail patters, etc. Throw to the side where you have the personnel advantage or the numbers game(2 DBs with a safety over the top on 3 WRs). And you can still run the ball effectively when its spread out. 1 MLB with 4 DL is in front of you. Thats it. Thats way better than running it with 9 in the box.
Spread out the offense causes the defense to spread out, and if they dont spread it out defensively just say hut and toss it to the WR that doesnt have anybody lined up in front of him and let him do his thing.
When the offense is spread out, you run basic slants, hitches, smash routes, rail patters, etc. Throw to the side where you have the personnel advantage or the numbers game(2 DBs with a safety over the top on 3 WRs). And you can still run the ball effectively when its spread out. 1 MLB with 4 DL is in front of you. Thats it. Thats way better than running it with 9 in the box.
Spread out the offense causes the defense to spread out, and if they dont spread it out defensively just say hut and toss it to the WR that doesnt have anybody lined up in front of him and let him do his thing.
This post was edited on 10/8/12 at 1:41 pm
Posted on 10/8/12 at 1:39 pm to Devious
Fundamentally, I like what they're doing. By the number of plays called they're pretty balanced this year.
It's variety in the passing game that's missing..and execution in all phases.
It's variety in the passing game that's missing..and execution in all phases.
Posted on 10/8/12 at 1:40 pm to KG5989
quote:And what if we can't catch those quick passes? Or when we do, while the WR is doing his thing, he fumbles? How is that any more effective?
Spread out the offense causes the defense to spread out, and if they dont just say hut and toss it to the WR that doesnt have anybody lined up in front of him and let him do his thing.
Posted on 10/8/12 at 1:43 pm to Devious
quote:
And what if we can't catch those quick passes? Or when we do, while the WR is doing his thing, he fumbles? How is that any more effective?
Then it wont work, obviously. I was just giving my input and actually recommended a new scheme. It doesnt matter what you run if the players dont make the plays. But, this would help open up our running game because all opposing teams are doing is putting 9 in the box with 1v1 on the WRs.
Who starts a thread and asks for peoples opinion on a new scheme, then when they give it, you act like a dbag and tell them how wrong they are. Sorry for giving my input to your shitty thread.
This post was edited on 10/8/12 at 1:45 pm
Posted on 10/8/12 at 1:44 pm to Devious
Wishbone
Posted on 10/8/12 at 1:45 pm to Devious
run more than one play per formation! If you only run certain plays out of certain looks, its pretty dam easy to figure out! Also, dont expect a QB to learn how to go through progressions if there is only one receiver on a route, and he is covered by half of the defense because they read the formation! 
Page 1 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News