- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Why not a 2-TE, 1-RB set with both TEs chipping?
Posted on 10/1/12 at 3:17 pm
Posted on 10/1/12 at 3:17 pm
..or bring one TE into the backfield using motion to chip the opposite side on his way out?
Yea/nay?
Yea/nay?
6
Posted on 10/1/12 at 3:18 pm to LSUAlum2001
You mean Football 101?
Posted on 10/1/12 at 3:18 pm to LSUAlum2001
No bail out options on the throw and greater likelihood mett forces it.
Posted on 10/1/12 at 3:19 pm to PeaRidgeWatash
quote:
You mean Football 101?
Yeah.
Maybe give Mett more than a second before having to avoid 2-3 guys.
Posted on 10/1/12 at 3:19 pm to southernelite
quote:
No bail out options on the throw and greater likelihood mett forces it.
RB is your checkdown.
Posted on 10/1/12 at 3:21 pm to southernelite
quote:
No bail out options on the throw and greater likelihood mett forces it.
If they are chipping end to inside, they release. I am mor in favor of one TE and a back in protection, so we can give a little help but also release theTE down the seam.
Posted on 10/1/12 at 3:22 pm to LSUAlum2001
If you're getting so much pressure that you need 2 TEs in to chip, odds are you RB is bailing you out of much, may as well chunk it in the stands.
Posted on 10/1/12 at 4:45 pm to southernelite
We don't have any TE's that threaten a defense in the passing game. It's basically a waste to have them out running a route.
Posted on 10/1/12 at 5:00 pm to LSUAlum2001
Our WRs aren't good enough to get open
Posted on 10/1/12 at 5:02 pm to oreeg
quote:
We don't have any TE's that threaten a defense in the passing game. It's basically a waste to have them out running a route.
Yeah, we didn't hit a seam route to one of them saturday or anything
Posted on 10/1/12 at 5:02 pm to LSUAlum2001
The 2 RB chips worked well. I'd like to see more of that with screens set up out of that formation.
Posted on 10/1/12 at 5:03 pm to JJ27
quote:
screens
This. With the ends shooting upfield, toss a few screens to keep them honest
Posted on 10/1/12 at 5:05 pm to LSUAlum2001
Just stating this in another thread. At least try the TEs. The WRs are dropping balls and the TEs aren't even getting a shot. Just saw an article where Richt was commenting on how good they are playing on O and would have never believed it based on their play in spring and fall practices. Maybe those guys would be better in game situations, doesn't hurt to try IMO.
Posted on 10/1/12 at 5:29 pm to Datbayoubengal
Run some seam or quick option routes for the TEs after the chip along with a back making the quick loop out of the backfield.
Posted on 10/1/12 at 6:22 pm to LSUAlum2001
quote:
..or bring one TE into the backfield using motion to chip the opposite side on his way out? Yea/nay?
They need to stop putting Hill in the backfield because he has no idea what a chip is or a corner blitz he just runs out for the pass.
If they want him in backfield then give him the ball and let him run.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News