Started By
Message

re: Per NYT: NFL owners are "dug in" and opposed to further compromise with NFLRA

Posted on 9/25/12 at 8:47 pm to
Posted by RollTide1987
Augusta, GA
Member since Nov 2009
64928 posts
Posted on 9/25/12 at 8:47 pm to
quote:

and doing what?



How's this for starters? The ball is kicked off, one team is on offense, the other is on defense. The QB snaps the ball and both teams just stand up, start patting each other on the back, talking to one another, and stand there doing nothing for an entire quarter.

They're still there, in uniform, technically "playing" and making their millions.

Or, they could do what the Packers were threatening to do in their locker room last night: just walk out there, snap the ball, and take a knee on every down. Once the game starts impacting the fans, that will be when the owners begin to feel the effects on their coffers.

This post was edited on 9/25/12 at 8:48 pm
Posted by diddydirtyAubie
Bozeman
Member since Dec 2010
39829 posts
Posted on 9/25/12 at 8:50 pm to
I will keep watching.
Posted by TigerintheNO
New Orleans
Member since Jan 2004
41153 posts
Posted on 9/25/12 at 8:53 pm to
quote:

It just doesn't make any sense.. This sport makes unreal amount of money.. why put this poor quality out on the field.


Pride

As I mentioned Monday, my colleague Peter King reported that the difference between the NFL and the refs' union is $3.3 million a year. Well, there are 256 regular season games. The NFL could have the real refs if it forked over an extra $12,891 per game.

LINK


Posted by Colonel Flagg
Baton Rouge
Member since Apr 2010
22773 posts
Posted on 9/25/12 at 9:13 pm to
The NFL screwed themselves by having an incompetent alternative. The real refs have no reason to compromise as the alternative has been so horrible so far.

Goodell and the owners really screwed themselves in these negotiations. The real refs should actually want more after the recent on field performance of their replacements.
Posted by Patrick_Bateman
Member since Jan 2012
17823 posts
Posted on 9/25/12 at 9:26 pm to
How about the NFLRA makes a few concessions and takes the NFL's offer? It takes two sides to make this deal, but only one has been getting all the blame. Both are at fault IMO.
Posted by wadewilson
Member since Sep 2009
36492 posts
Posted on 9/25/12 at 10:21 pm to
Viewership is up about 8 percent.
Posted by Sophandros
Victoria Concordia Crescit
Member since Feb 2005
45218 posts
Posted on 9/25/12 at 10:37 pm to
The refs didn't lock themselves out. They also didn't break a promise to the owners.

Quit applying the Balance Fallacy and look at this objectively.
Posted by JazzyJeff
Japan
Member since Sep 2006
3938 posts
Posted on 9/26/12 at 2:25 am to
quote:

No way owners budge while the media is covering it every minute. Media scrutiny almost guarantees they don't conceed.
Only empty stadiums, sports bars, and living rooms will get these old bastards to budge.
Posted by TheDoc
doc is no more
Member since Dec 2005
99297 posts
Posted on 9/26/12 at 7:24 am to
quote:

As I mentioned Monday, my colleague Peter King reported that the difference between the NFL and the refs' union is $3.3 million a year. Well, there are 256 regular season games. The NFL could have the real refs if it forked over an extra $12,891 per game.


Unreal
Posted by Patrick_Bateman
Member since Jan 2012
17823 posts
Posted on 9/26/12 at 7:43 am to
quote:

They also didn't break a promise to the owners.

Genuine question: what promise? I really don't know.
Posted by Sophandros
Victoria Concordia Crescit
Member since Feb 2005
45218 posts
Posted on 9/26/12 at 7:45 am to
That comes out to $103,125 per team per year.

Again, anyone on the owners' side on this is an idiot.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 2Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram