- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Trade Evaulation
Posted on 9/18/12 at 10:26 pm
Posted on 9/18/12 at 10:26 pm
Bradshaw, Chris Johnson, and Lance Moore for Lynch and AJ Green.
12 team, Non-PPR, 6 pt TDs
Neither are my teams but this is a trade has been accepted pending approval. What do you guys think? TIA
12 team, Non-PPR, 6 pt TDs
Neither are my teams but this is a trade has been accepted pending approval. What do you guys think? TIA
3
Posted on 9/18/12 at 10:28 pm to tigers444
Lynch and aj green 
Posted on 9/18/12 at 10:29 pm to Tyler12345
I like that side better too but do you think this trade is fair?
Posted on 9/18/12 at 10:30 pm to tigers444
Yes.
Posted on 9/18/12 at 10:32 pm to SwampDonks
IF big IF cj can produce like he is capable then yes. It's not him. It's that o line.
Posted on 9/18/12 at 10:35 pm to tigers444
I'm not sure.
A high scoring RB (Lynch) and a consistent WR (Green) for an injured Bradshaw, a terribly starting CJ, and a hit or miss in Lance Moore?
I think its kinda one-sided. We don't know anything about how bad Bradshaw's neck injury is. Chris Johnson has been running so badly that people are asking Munchak if they'll bench him.
Yea, it seems pretty one-sided to me, but as the person ahead of me posted, if CJ can produce, it'll work out, but that is a huge IF.
A high scoring RB (Lynch) and a consistent WR (Green) for an injured Bradshaw, a terribly starting CJ, and a hit or miss in Lance Moore?
I think its kinda one-sided. We don't know anything about how bad Bradshaw's neck injury is. Chris Johnson has been running so badly that people are asking Munchak if they'll bench him.
Yea, it seems pretty one-sided to me, but as the person ahead of me posted, if CJ can produce, it'll work out, but that is a huge IF.
This post was edited on 9/18/12 at 10:37 pm
Posted on 9/18/12 at 10:38 pm to Tyler12345
Agreed. But I don't think giving up 2 #1's for an IF, Bradshaw, and L. Moore helps his team any.
After the trade, his lineup would look like:
AP
Bradshaw/Dlo
CJ2k
L. Moore
Decker
Maybe I'm overthinking it.
After the trade, his lineup would look like:
AP
Bradshaw/Dlo
CJ2k
L. Moore
Decker
Maybe I'm overthinking it.
Posted on 9/18/12 at 10:41 pm to Scruffy
That sounds more of how I'm viewing this trade. It's a money league so I don't want to get screwed.
CJ is a buy low right now so I'm not sure how two pretty good players for him is a fair trade.
CJ is a buy low right now so I'm not sure how two pretty good players for him is a fair trade.
This post was edited on 9/18/12 at 10:43 pm
Posted on 9/18/12 at 10:44 pm to tigers444
He probably wants to start 3 RB's that's why
Posted on 9/18/12 at 10:47 pm to 21JumpStreet
He's already starting Lynch, AP, and D. Williams before the trade.
Posted on 9/18/12 at 10:48 pm to tigers444
quote:Yea, dude is an idiot to make that trade. He loses big time.
After the trade, his lineup would look like:
AP
Bradshaw/Dlo
CJ2k
L. Moore
Decker
Injured Bradshaw
Dlo isn't bad, but Carolina is "run-by-committee"
CJ2K is sucking terribly
L. Moore is a huge hit or miss
Decker isn't exactly putting up #1 pts either.
Definite one-sided trade. What does the other guy's line-up look like?
Posted on 9/18/12 at 10:52 pm to Scruffy
2nd team gets better after the trade.
Spiller
Lynch
Matthews/Bowe
Demaryius Thomas
AJ Green
Spiller
Lynch
Matthews/Bowe
Demaryius Thomas
AJ Green
This post was edited on 9/18/12 at 10:53 pm
Posted on 9/18/12 at 10:54 pm to tigers444
Yea, I'd veto it. That is too one-sided for my tastes.
Posted on 9/18/12 at 10:56 pm to Scruffy
quote:
Yea, I'd veto it.
Such bullshite. Who are you to tell people how to manage their teams?
Only trades that should be vetoed is obvious collusion, and this is nothing close to that.
Posted on 9/18/12 at 10:58 pm to Scruffy
Appreciate the opinion. I don't like the trade that much either but I'll ask others in the league what they think too.
Posted on 9/18/12 at 11:04 pm to SwampDonks
quote:
Such bullshite. Who are you to tell people how to manage their teams?
Only trades that should be vetoed is obvious collusion, and this is nothing close to that.
When money is involved, I wouldn't hesitate to veto a trade if it is one-sided.
IMO, this trade is pretty sketchy.
Posted on 9/18/12 at 11:07 pm to tigers444
Isn't money involved in all fantasy leagues? This trade isn't sketchy in the slighest. You are delusional and only mad because another owner made a great trade and that lessens your chances.
If you want to veto, fine, but you'll be in the minority.
Posted on 9/18/12 at 11:07 pm to SwampDonks
quote:This is pretty damn close.
Only trades that should be vetoed is obvious collusion, and this is nothing close to that.
A #1 RB for a RB who suffered a neck injury (an injury which we know nothing about yet) and a RB who has amassed 21 yds through 2 games.
Lance Moore isn't a bad WR, but like all the Saints' WRs, he is hit or miss. A. J. Green is CIN's #1.
With money involved, there is no reason not to veto that trade.
Posted on 9/18/12 at 11:12 pm to SwampDonks
quote:
Isn't money involved in all fantasy leagues?
This trade isn't sketchy in the slighest. You are delusional and only mad because another owner made a great trade and that lessens your chances.
If you want to veto, fine, but you'll be in the minority.
I play in one free league with some friends. All others are money leagues.
I'm not mad or delusional. I'm just trying to see how this is fair.
And no, I'm not in the minority. I got 3 other owners on board so far.
Posted on 9/18/12 at 11:13 pm to Scruffy
quote:
A #1 RB for a RB who suffered a neck injury (an injury which we know nothing about yet) and a RB who has amassed 21 yds through 2 games.
The injury might not be serious, might be. The owner is willing to take that risk. And why can't the owner believe that CJ will turn things around? If he believes that he will and wants to trade for him, you nor anybody else should be able to take that chance away from him. Let him make his own decisions.
quote:
Lance Moore isn't a bad WR, but like all the Saints' WRs, he is hit or miss. A. J. Green is CIN's #1.
Moore has Brees throwing to him while Green has Dalton. Green has scored exactly one more point than Moore has this year.
I don't see how you guys think this is anywhere close to collusion.
Collusion would be someone trading away Lynch and Green for Ronnie Brown. Let the owners make their own decisions, even if you don't agree with them. Bradshaw could be fine and CJ could turn things around and then the other owner wins the trade. If an owner wants to take that chance, let him.
Page 1 of 2
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News