- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: NFL presented Vilma w/sworn affidavit of GW stating Vilma offered 10k for Favre
Posted on 9/18/12 at 7:39 pm to FalseProphet
Posted on 9/18/12 at 7:39 pm to FalseProphet
Also, I'm avoiding the whole discussion of malice and intent, which might be required given Vilma's public status.
0
Posted on 9/18/12 at 8:07 pm to poe tay toes
quote:
goodell has one thing to prove. that he had firm evidence.
WE have over 49,000 more pages to review!
Posted on 9/18/12 at 11:44 pm to Bayou
Roger Don't blow my high
'Specially if you don't know my life, don't make me bring
Sharpton in it 'cause I'm dark skinneded or
Dude, with the 'fro and the Rainbow Coalition,
'Specially if you don't know my life, don't make me bring
Sharpton in it 'cause I'm dark skinneded or
Dude, with the 'fro and the Rainbow Coalition,
Posted on 9/19/12 at 7:57 am to FalseProphet
quote:
Goodell doesn't have to prove a damn thing. Vilma has to show that Goodell knew the accusations were false.
Proving that Goodell intended to lie would be near impossible, but if Goodell's claims of thousands of pages of hard evidence plus assertions that coaches and players admitted to pay for injury are proven to be false or mischaracterized, can that legally be found to be defamation? The public claim of evidence that doesn't exist, I mean.
Posted on 9/19/12 at 10:08 am to shinerfan
There is a lot of talk here about "proof" and what would/would not matter in court. Consider that this would never go to court, as the NFL does not want to get involved in depositions & having to show exactly what its evidence consists of. This is the leverage that Ginsberg is counting on & in the end, the league will want to settle. Goodell has said over & over that the league does not want to "rat out" its snitchers & the league would have do exactly that when the discovery subpoenas hit its desks. The discovery demands will ask for any & everything the league has in this matter. Next would be the depositions of GW, Curello, Goodell, etc etc. And according to this morning's Times Picayne, Curello is now very obviously a disgruntled employee.
Posted on 9/22/12 at 12:15 pm to motorbreath
quote:
Let's see...the affidavit was signed on FRIDAY and today is MONDAY. Not sure about exact dates but from the time the suspensions were voided until GW signed that affidavit was about 10 days. Just enough time to have your people contact his people and get it all arranged. This investigation is getting more sketchy at every turn.
So very true ..... If it walks like a duck, and quacks like a duck.....
The BS meter is screaming !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Page 11 of 11
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News