Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message
locked post

Tough loss for the program. At least we still have Mett.

Posted on 8/10/12 at 1:06 pm
Posted by Make It Rayne
Rayne
Member since Sep 2009
2022 posts
Posted on 8/10/12 at 1:06 pm
We will still have a sick D-line and deep linebacker core. Not to mention we still have Mett, which IMO, is more important to this team than anything.
Posted by poncho villa
DALLAS
Member since Jul 2010
17685 posts
Posted on 8/10/12 at 1:07 pm to
this thread was not needed
Posted by LSU=Champions
BAWxtard | Tier 1
Member since Apr 2004
22257 posts
Posted on 8/10/12 at 1:07 pm to
quote:

99% of these threads are not needed


FIFY
Posted by TIGERSby10
Central Lafourche
Member since Nov 2005
6913 posts
Posted on 8/10/12 at 1:08 pm to
quote:

this thread was not needed


BS

I think everyone underestimates the importance of Met scoring more than enough points to offset #7 getting the boot. I wouldn't trade Met for an entire secondary of #7's.
Posted by Brettesaurus Rex
Baton Rouge
Member since Dec 2009
38259 posts
Posted on 8/10/12 at 1:09 pm to
I think it was. If it was Mett, it would be twenty times worse for this program.
Posted by TigerStripes30
Alexandria, LA
Member since Dec 2011
6369 posts
Posted on 8/10/12 at 1:10 pm to
quote:

this thread was not needed



agree
Posted by Make It Rayne
Rayne
Member since Sep 2009
2022 posts
Posted on 8/10/12 at 1:11 pm to
I think it is needed. Time to move forward, bro. You gotta be optimistic with what team we have now. Can't look back at the misfortunes of the program.
Posted by TIGERSby10
Central Lafourche
Member since Nov 2005
6913 posts
Posted on 8/10/12 at 1:33 pm to
quote:

Can't look back at the misfortunes of the program.


or at an idiot who can't keep his drug problem in check
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram