- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
2013 top defensive/offensive prospects according to CFN...
Posted on 7/12/12 at 12:15 am
Posted on 7/12/12 at 12:15 am
LINK
LINK
Can't understand how Hurst is listed much higher than Faulk, Montgomery is much higher than Mingo and Freak is on the list but not Logan.
IMO, Hurst seems like he is more of a guard then tackle. Typically, most teams best tackle will be their LT, so I'm not sure why Hurst is ahead of Faulk.
There can be an argument of who is better between Mingo/Montgomery. According to may prognosticators, Mingo has the bigger upside.
Freak might eventually be better than Logan, but at the end of the season IMO Logan was playing better then Brockers. Freak didn't even get enough play enough to be rated that high.
LINK
Can't understand how Hurst is listed much higher than Faulk, Montgomery is much higher than Mingo and Freak is on the list but not Logan.
IMO, Hurst seems like he is more of a guard then tackle. Typically, most teams best tackle will be their LT, so I'm not sure why Hurst is ahead of Faulk.
There can be an argument of who is better between Mingo/Montgomery. According to may prognosticators, Mingo has the bigger upside.
Freak might eventually be better than Logan, but at the end of the season IMO Logan was playing better then Brockers. Freak didn't even get enough play enough to be rated that high.
This post was edited on 7/12/12 at 12:19 am
4
Posted on 7/12/12 at 2:08 am to Toughcrittercrumb1
Do they project punters?
Posted on 7/12/12 at 2:39 am to TBoy
quote:
Do they project punters?
If not, you can project your own. Just Wing it.
Posted on 7/12/12 at 3:25 am to loweralabamatrojan
ISWYDT
Posted on 7/12/12 at 4:36 am to Toughcrittercrumb1
Both lists pretty much suck, all speculative, and not in a fairly rational way.
Posted on 7/12/12 at 8:07 am to Toughcrittercrumb1
quote:
Freak is on the list but not Logan.
Makes no sense at all. Even among LSU fans, it seems like Freak is always the one mentioned in our list of great D-linemen (Mingo, Montgomery, etc.). Bennie Logan is a standout player and deserves a lot more credit than he gets. If you can stomach it, watch the NCG again, and tell me he wasn't the best player on our whole defense that night. I mean, I understand he was a little-known recruit from podunk Louisiana, but at some point you have to start giving credit where credit's due. IMO, he belongs in the same conversation as M&M. Freak isn't there yet, but he will be. Until then, let's start giving Logan some love.
/rant
Posted on 7/12/12 at 8:21 am to Toughcrittercrumb1
This list is bogus... They have Florida's backup QB listed and not the starter.
Posted on 7/12/12 at 8:21 am to loweralabamatrojan
quote:
If not, you can project your own. Just Wing it.
ISWYDT
Posted on 7/12/12 at 9:17 am to Patrick_Bateman
I thought Logan and Brockers were pretty much neck and neck ever since 2011 spring game.
Posted on 7/12/12 at 9:25 am to Hurricane Mike
If you look they have incoming freshman on the list too.. I think the list was in terms of where they stack up and project to be when they go pro, the FR WR that went to Missouri is on the list as a 1st rounder and hasn't put on the uniform yet.
Hurst has everything it takes to be a beast at RT in the NFL while Faulk can be a great LT it's just a little harder to do.
Hurst has everything it takes to be a beast at RT in the NFL while Faulk can be a great LT it's just a little harder to do.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News