- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
The Spurs in Tony Parker's last 50 starts
Posted on 5/31/12 at 8:18 am
Posted on 5/31/12 at 8:18 am
Just heard one of the more amazing stats I can think of:
In the past 50 games Tony Parker has started, the Spurs are 46-4
To win the title, the Spurs just need to go 6-6 the rest of the way.
This team is unreal.
In the past 50 games Tony Parker has started, the Spurs are 46-4
To win the title, the Spurs just need to go 6-6 the rest of the way.
This team is unreal.
9
Posted on 5/31/12 at 8:19 am to shel311
quote:
In the past 50 games Tony Parker has started, the Spurs are 46-4
Posted on 5/31/12 at 8:23 am to shel311
The Spurs have lost 4 games since March 9th
The Thunder have to beat them 4 times in the next 5 games.
thats nutso
The Thunder have to beat them 4 times in the next 5 games.
thats nutso
Posted on 5/31/12 at 8:23 am to slackster
I never liked the Spurs much but why does he automatically get listed behind CP and DWill when it comes to PG rankings when they have never won anything?
Posted on 5/31/12 at 8:24 am to CQQ
quote:Well, I do agree that he is behind Paul and DWill.
I never liked the Spurs much but why does he automatically get listed behind CP and DWill when it comes to PG rankings when they have never won anything?
But your greater point does speak to the hypocrisy of guys always propping the "LOOK AT THE RINGS" argument for some guys, but not for Tony Parker.
Posted on 5/31/12 at 8:26 am to CQQ
quote:
but why does he automatically get listed behind CP and DWill when it comes to PG rankings when they have never won anything?
3 reasons, with 1 kind of changing
1. dwill/paul are "pure" point guards. the position is judged in terms of this ability. however, this is changing with the new NBA rules and the proliferation of scoring points (rose, westbrook, parker, etc)
2. he's typically just not as good as dwill/paul. this was his best year of his career, though
3. titles are team stats. parker won some titles when duncan was at his peak. at least 1 of these titles involved seasons when pop was pretty much always angry at parker for how he was playing, also
Posted on 5/31/12 at 8:26 am to shel311
quote:
To win the title, the Spurs just need to go 6-6 the rest of the way.
well that's not exactly accurate.
Posted on 5/31/12 at 8:28 am to CQQ
quote:
I never liked the Spurs much but why does he automatically get listed behind CP and DWill when it comes to PG rankings when they have never won anything?
Because he's not flashy about it. He's the best PG in the game... his team record and individual stats prove that.
Posted on 5/31/12 at 8:34 am to Philosoraptor
I can't argue that. CP gets listed at 1-2 but has never been to a conference finals and has a great disappearing act when he wants to.
Posted on 5/31/12 at 8:42 am to bbap
quote:You got the point lol.
well that's not exactly accurate
They can play .500 ball and still win the title.
Posted on 5/31/12 at 8:44 am to Philosoraptor
quote:Team record doesn't prove anything.
his team record and individual stats prove that
Is Duncan the best PF in the game this season? His team record says so. Ginobli, best SG as well?
quote:
individual stats prove that
Have you seen his stats compared to Chris Paul's?
Posted on 5/31/12 at 8:54 am to shel311
Posted on 5/31/12 at 9:25 am to shel311
quote:
Have you seen his stats compared to Chris Paul's?
Have you?
Tony Parker:
MPG - 32.0 PPG - 18.3 APG - 7.7 FG% - 0.48
CP3:
MPG - 36.4 PPG - 19.8 APG - 9.1 FG% - 0.478
CP3 wasn't better in the regular season and def wasn't close to the level Parker has played in the post season.
You need to consider the minutes each of them played per game.
Parker had more points per minute and CP3 barely had more assists per minute.
Posted on 5/31/12 at 9:26 am to shel311
They are going to win it all. Good for them.
Posted on 5/31/12 at 9:29 am to Philosoraptor
quote:He was.
CP3 wasn't better in the regular season
Why'd you leave out rebounds and steals?
And that barely touches on defense, Paul is definitely a better defender.
Per 36:
Paul: 19.6/9.0/3.5/2.5 steals
Parker: 20.5/8.7/3.2/1.1
Pauls PER was 27 to Parker's 22.
You can't really say based on the numbers that Parker was better.
Posted on 5/31/12 at 9:34 am to shel311
when parker's mid-range is on, jesus christ he's unstoppable.
Posted on 5/31/12 at 9:40 am to shel311
He was 5th in the MVP voting.
That stat is incredible, though. I can see that as a reason for people to vote him #2 behind LeBron this year. After all, MVP voting doesn't necessarily mean anything.
That stat is incredible, though. I can see that as a reason for people to vote him #2 behind LeBron this year. After all, MVP voting doesn't necessarily mean anything.
This post was edited on 5/31/12 at 9:41 am
Posted on 5/31/12 at 9:55 am to shel311
I'll give steals to CP3 but rebounds is just a function of Griffin sucking dick in that category.
Parker doesn't have to go after rebounds like CP3 does.
Either way, when it matters, Parker is a lot better than CP3.
Parker doesn't have to go after rebounds like CP3 does.
Either way, when it matters, Parker is a lot better than CP3.
Posted on 5/31/12 at 10:01 am to Philosoraptor
but can parker do the flopping tornado like cp3?
Posted on 5/31/12 at 10:05 am to The Egg
quote:
flopping tornado
Page 1 of 2
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News