Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message
locked post

Bernucca is at it again - another Hornets jab

Posted on 5/27/12 at 6:33 pm
Posted by GeauxHornets
New Orleans
Member since Jan 2011
202 posts
Posted on 5/27/12 at 6:33 pm
Bernucca: Sixers' Playoff Run Shows Why Teams Should Never Tank

Monty Williams would have his head for accusing the Hornets of "looking like they’re trying when they’re really not." No team did more with less this season than the Hornets; getting 21 wins out of them was quite impressive. I obviously have plenty of other problems with this column than just that line, but I figured I'd start there.
Posted by tehchampion140
Member since Sep 2010
18816 posts
Posted on 5/27/12 at 6:42 pm to
The Cavs didn't even let their rookie Kyrie Irving play out the final few games, yet we lose our only player worth a shite and we're not trying? Give me a break. It must be nice to get paid to be able to write lies.
Posted by RonFNSwanson
University of LSU
Member since Mar 2012
23150 posts
Posted on 5/27/12 at 7:13 pm to
quote:

The draft lottery is Wednesday. Good luck, Hornets fans.



Thanks, jackass


If derrick rose doesn't get hurt they are out in 5.
Posted by Fearthehat0307
Dallas, TX
Member since Dec 2007
65256 posts
Posted on 5/27/12 at 7:14 pm to
why are we giving lip service to a piece of shite douche that looks like this



ignore him and hopefully he will get hit by a blimp and die
Posted by GeauxHornets
New Orleans
Member since Jan 2011
202 posts
Posted on 5/27/12 at 7:16 pm to
I tried commenting on the column, not sure if it went through... but this is what I said:

"The main oversight here, in my opinion, is giving credence to the "more than a few observers who felt the Sixers would be better served by missing the playoffs and getting into the draft lottery." Sitting at 31-30, the furthest they could have fallen by tanking their final five games would have been the 11th worst record, with 12th worst being the most likely outcome. It seems far-fetched to suggest that the 76ers should have tanked their final five games in order to acquire a <1% chance at landing the top pick. I believe you when you say that there were people that did, but those people clearly don't understand the concept of risk vs. reward. The same goes for those who were content with the Rockets punting their playoff chances away. I stand by my opinion that I prefer the Hornets' strategy as opposed to becoming a perennial fringe playoff team, but if I was a fan of that fringe playoff team, I wouldn't be rooting for them to "tank" with five games remaining when they were on the playoff bubble.

My main point is this: tanking isn't a strategy that fringe teams should use as the season winds down to sneak into the lottery; going from a 0% chance of the top pick to a .8% chance is absolutely not worth it. Tanking makes far more sense, however, for a bad team that is far out of playoff contention, as that team can increase their lottery odds by a far greater percentage."
Posted by Fearthehat0307
Dallas, TX
Member since Dec 2007
65256 posts
Posted on 5/27/12 at 7:18 pm to
quote:

"The main oversight here, in my opinion, is giving credence to the "more than a few observers who felt the Sixers would be better served by missing the playoffs and getting into the draft lottery." Sitting at 31-30, the furthest they could have fallen by tanking their final five games would have been the 11th worst record, with 12th worst being the most likely outcome. It seems far-fetched to suggest that the 76ers should have tanked their final five games in order to acquire a <1% chance at landing the top pick. I believe you when you say that there were people that did, but those people clearly don't understand the concept of risk vs. reward. The same goes for those who were content with the Rockets punting their playoff chances away. I stand by my opinion that I prefer the Hornets' strategy as opposed to becoming a perennial fringe playoff team, but if I was a fan of that fringe playoff team, I wouldn't be rooting for them to "tank" with five games remaining when they were on the playoff bubble.

My main point is this: tanking isn't a strategy that fringe teams should use as the season winds down to sneak into the lottery; going from a 0% chance of the top pick to a .8% chance is absolutely not worth it. Tanking makes far more sense, however, for a bad team that is far out of playoff contention, as that team can increase their lottery odds by a far greater percentage."

couldnt have said it better myself
Posted by RonFNSwanson
University of LSU
Member since Mar 2012
23150 posts
Posted on 5/27/12 at 7:20 pm to
quote:

why are we giving lip service to a piece of shite douche that looks like this


Is he a balding man with a mohawk?
Posted by RonFNSwanson
University of LSU
Member since Mar 2012
23150 posts
Posted on 5/27/12 at 7:23 pm to
quote:

My main point is this: tanking isn't a strategy that fringe teams should use as the season winds down to sneak into the lottery; going from a 0% chance of the top pick to a .8% chance is absolutely not worth it. Tanking makes far more sense, however, for a bad team that is far out of playoff contention, as that team can increase their lottery odds by a far greater percentage."




I agree with that too. If the Hornets had a chance to make it into the playoffs down the stretch, of course I would want them to try. But we had no shot.

I didn't see if he was a local guy, but why is he picking on our team? We were by far the most competitive of the bottom 7-8
Posted by Fearthehat0307
Dallas, TX
Member since Dec 2007
65256 posts
Posted on 5/27/12 at 7:27 pm to
quote:

I didn't see if he was a local guy, but why is he picking on our team? We were by far the most competitive of the bottom 7-8
he has to have some kind of bad relation to new orleans or the hornets. anyone who would speak of tanking this year without mentioning the bobcats is a more obvious troll than souljah
Posted by THRILLHO
Metry, LA
Member since Apr 2006
49486 posts
Posted on 5/27/12 at 7:52 pm to
Hornets went 11-11 (with some very close losses) down the stretch after starting off 10-34. Aside from potentially bringing back a few injured players sooner (and risk re-injury) or playing Ariza (wanting to see what Aminu can do is pretty legit), they didn't do any tanking except Q4 of that Houston game.
Posted by RonFNSwanson
University of LSU
Member since Mar 2012
23150 posts
Posted on 5/27/12 at 7:54 pm to
quote:

Hornets went 11-11 (with some very close losses) down the stretch


and like a 7 game win streak too.


frick that guy
Posted by GeauxHornets
New Orleans
Member since Jan 2011
202 posts
Posted on 5/28/12 at 9:35 am to
I'm going to post another rebuttal today. This is going to be fun.

UPDATE: Posted it yesterday evening
This post was edited on 6/1/12 at 2:40 pm
Posted by karlkadabra
LaPlace
Member since May 2012
317 posts
Posted on 5/28/12 at 10:15 am to
That guy just randomly made the Hornets his victim. For one thing, I'm not sure the Hornets played more than 3 games with their projected starting lineup. Second, they almost beat the Lakers at Los Angeles with only 8 guys?! They were suffering from injury and were able to compete game after game, even if they didn't win. Look out if they had Okafor and Gordon the whole season. We'd be a playoff team. Yeah, Bernucca, the team wanted to get injured and suffer from a lack of an owner.

Idiot.
This post was edited on 5/28/12 at 10:18 am
Posted by aswemajor
Baton Rouge
Member since May 2011
1703 posts
Posted on 5/28/12 at 12:55 pm to
quote:

I'm not sure the Hornets played more than 3 games with their projected starting lineup


We played 0 games with our projected starting lineup
Posted by GeauxHornets
New Orleans
Member since Jan 2011
202 posts
Posted on 6/1/12 at 2:35 pm to
Hornets247 2, SheridanHoops 0.

Message delivered.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram