Started By
Message
locked post

John Chavis Defensive Scheme

Posted on 4/28/12 at 1:30 pm
Posted by RonSwanson
Mike's penthouse
Member since Dec 2011
523 posts
Posted on 4/28/12 at 1:30 pm
I'm sure it's been posted before and discussed. And I know he runs a 4-3.

But, could anybody with an X's and O's mind, elaborate a little bit about the way he runs his particular scheme.
Posted by sunnydaze
Member since Jan 2010
29933 posts
Posted on 4/28/12 at 1:34 pm to
quote:

anybody with X's and O's mind


you've definitely come to the right place
Posted by Tigerbait337
Louisiana
Member since Aug 2008
20535 posts
Posted on 4/28/12 at 1:35 pm to
quote:

And I know he runs a 4-3.



4-2-5
Posted by RonSwanson
Mike's penthouse
Member since Dec 2011
523 posts
Posted on 4/28/12 at 1:35 pm to
quote:

you've definitely come to the right place




Despite the fact that rantards are the majority here, there are a few intelligent people who could answer this question.

I think, I saw it once.
Posted by Spirit of Dunson
Member since Mar 2007
23111 posts
Posted on 4/28/12 at 1:37 pm to
quote:

elaborate a little bit about the way he runs his particular scheme.

He has awesome athletes and he teaches them to not let the other team get the football into the endzone. Rather genius, really.
Posted by Chuck U Farley
The 318
Member since Oct 2007
8994 posts
Posted on 4/28/12 at 1:37 pm to
He runs a 4-2-5 base now. A nickel package so the TM7 can roam. Speed on the ends and usually large run stuffers in the middle. Usually turns db's into lb's to utilize speed and better coverage skills.
Posted by eXfaktor
A 10 by 11 Dump
Member since Jan 2011
1559 posts
Posted on 4/28/12 at 1:42 pm to
Thanks for anwering, Chuck.

quote:

He runs a 4-2-5 base now.

quote:

Usually turns db's into lb's to utilize speed and better coverage skills.

Was the switch from a 4-3, and before or after Harry Coleman(right player?) transitioning from Safety to more of a hybrid S/LB?
Posted by NorfolkVATiger
Guam
Member since Nov 2005
2786 posts
Posted on 4/28/12 at 1:44 pm to
Chris Brown wrote a bit about Chavis before the WVU game...here's the article:

Chris Brown on John Chavis

The second half of the article breaks down the mustang package (actually it just talks more about zone blitz principles, but it's a start).
This post was edited on 4/28/12 at 1:48 pm
Posted by NorfolkVATiger
Guam
Member since Nov 2005
2786 posts
Posted on 4/28/12 at 1:45 pm to
The switch to more of a 4-2-5 coincided with us having some very mediocre linebackers and a freshman named Tyrann Mathieu. Perfect storm that drove Chavis to introduce a true nickel package, which he never had before coming to LSU.
Posted by RonSwanson
Mike's penthouse
Member since Dec 2011
523 posts
Posted on 4/28/12 at 1:46 pm to
quote:

He runs a 4-2-5 base now. A nickel package so the TM7 can roam. Speed on the ends and usually large run stuffers in the middle. Usually turns db's into lb's to utilize speed and better coverage skills


Thanks for answering.

How do you think we have been so successful at stopping the run?

Our defense is based on speed, and it doesn't seem like we are geared to stop the run. But, we do. Just wondering if it's a particular way he runs it?
Posted by wish i was tebow
The Golf Board
Member since Feb 2009
46121 posts
Posted on 4/28/12 at 1:47 pm to
What you will see (especially int eh coming years) is he likes to have the tackles stuff holes and run gaps to open holes for really athletic LBs to fire in the holes and make plays

Tm7 plays kinda a dog back/rover and has Brandon Taylor (Eric Reid now) play over the top of him and reads what he does and plays cover or man depending on what TM7 does

This is very simplified and would be really hard to explain better without being able to show you film and break it down

Alittle thing to thinks about that will make u appreciate our athletes more is that our D tackles aren't designed to make the plays, when they get a sack or makes a play we are so use to seeing that player has exceeded his expectation. He has gone above and beyond his job on that play
Posted by NorfolkVATiger
Guam
Member since Nov 2005
2786 posts
Posted on 4/28/12 at 1:51 pm to
quote:

What you will see (especially int eh coming years) is he likes to have the tackles stuff holes and run gaps to open holes for really athletic LBs to fire in the holes and make plays


That's very true, and we still run a fair bit of 4-3. Historically, as you say, Chavis runs a very linebacker-centric defense, meaning it's designed to funnel plays to the linebackers. With the exception of last year, on Chavis teams, the top 3 or 4 in total tackles are linebackers almost every year he's coached.

With TM probably going pro next year, and a very promising linebacker class on board, I suspect we'll see more true 4-3 after this year and less of the nickel packages.
Posted by Ponchy Tiger
Ponchatoula
Member since Aug 2004
45062 posts
Posted on 4/28/12 at 2:06 pm to
quote:

How do you think we have been so successful at stopping the run? Our defense is based on speed, and it doesn't seem like we are geared to stop the run. But, we do. Just wondering if it's a particular way he runs it?


IMO, technique, everyone playing their assignments, agressive play and superior athletes.
Posted by RonSwanson
Mike's penthouse
Member since Dec 2011
523 posts
Posted on 4/28/12 at 2:07 pm to
quote:

What you will see (especially int eh coming years) is he likes to have the tackles stuff holes and run gaps to open holes for really athletic LBs to fire in the holes and make plays


This is what I thought.

Are 4-3 defenses typically set up this way?

It almost sounds like a 3-4s' scheme
Posted by bengaltygers
Da East
Member since Dec 2007
1699 posts
Posted on 4/28/12 at 2:10 pm to
I ha tried to explain this before to no avail, but here goes. Chavis does not run a 425. He runs a 43. We do play the majority of nickel personnel (5dbs) but the scheme is still a 43. Let me explain. A 43 is a 7 man front and the coverage correlates as such. A 425 is an 8 man front and the run fits/coverages are dictated by this. We run a 7 man front with a base quarters/palms coverage. This is a 43. I realize the personnel on the field is technically 425 but our front plays as a 43. Hopefully it works this time.
Posted by 7thWardTiger
Richmond, Texas
Member since Nov 2009
24670 posts
Posted on 4/28/12 at 2:19 pm to
quote:

How do you think we have been so successful at stopping the run? Our defense is based on speed, and it doesn't seem like we are geared to stop the run. But, we do. Just wondering if it's a particular way he runs it?

D line reads and reacts to the blocking of the offensive lineman. For example, when the lineman base blocks, the d lineman engages and uses a move to 'undercut' the block. Defensive ends uses their speed to either undercut or squeeze down into the tackles hip pocket and screams down the line(think Mingo and Oregon). Linebackers read the triangle(guard to guard to back). When a guard pulls, they scrape over the top and follow). Playside linebacker spills the play to the outside. Safeties fill the alleys.
Posted by RonSwanson
Mike's penthouse
Member since Dec 2011
523 posts
Posted on 4/28/12 at 2:20 pm to
Right.

The traditional 4-2-5, run by Gary Patterson at TCU, would be an eight man front, typically consisting of two safety type players, not a TM7.
Posted by bengaltygers
Da East
Member since Dec 2007
1699 posts
Posted on 4/28/12 at 2:24 pm to
Thank you Jesus. Someone understands football.
Posted by wish i was tebow
The Golf Board
Member since Feb 2009
46121 posts
Posted on 4/28/12 at 2:24 pm to
quote:

With TM probably going pro next year, and a very promising linebacker class on board, I suspect we'll see more true 4-3 after this year and less of the nickel packages.


This is what I've been saying. We have great lbs comin in so we will begin to see even more of a true chavis scheme in the next couple years


Think about how sick our d will be if we can keep getting top Dline to go with this solid group of backers coming in :jizz:


And yeah people say we run a 425 but that's not true at all. 4-3 and a lot of nickle. TM7 plays a rover type alot but it's really not a rover. It's really hard to explain by just typing especially when there are a bunch of people here explaining it that have no clue
This post was edited on 4/28/12 at 2:28 pm
Posted by TigerMan327
Elsewhere
Member since Feb 2011
5127 posts
Posted on 4/28/12 at 2:29 pm to
Our base is a 4-3, we just tend to run a lot of 4-2-5. Not the other way around
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 5Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram