- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Saints announce Vitt to take over HC duties.
Posted on 4/12/12 at 3:58 pm to Chad504boy
Posted on 4/12/12 at 3:58 pm to Chad504boy
Vitt + Shanle = kinky crackers.
1
Posted on 4/12/12 at 3:59 pm to sicboy
Can we just get those two front office jobs and be done with it?
Posted on 4/12/12 at 3:59 pm to eyeran
Holy cow. We've praised this FO all this time, and now we freak out over this?
Posted on 4/12/12 at 4:01 pm to sicboy
You've gotta admit if they're just gonna put Kromer in charge during his suspension, then it makes sense just to do that in the first place.
Posted on 4/12/12 at 4:01 pm to Patrick O Rly
quote:
Not surprising, but it is a bit disappointing.
i don't get why it's so disappointing. it's only temporary. SP is the head coach... not bringing in some big name backup is probably for the best in the long run.
Posted on 4/12/12 at 4:02 pm to BobBoucher
It seems like this decision was made because it will be the easiest transition for when Payton gets back
Posted on 4/12/12 at 4:03 pm to Patrick O Rly
I really don't care if Rita is wearing the headset and chomping on Juicy Fruit. Just get Drew signed PRONTO!!
Posted on 4/12/12 at 4:05 pm to Patrick O Rly
quote:This
You've gotta admit if they're just gonna put Kromer in charge during his suspension, then it makes sense just to do that in the first place.
Vitt is HC through the preseason games, then he's gone?
You bring a new guy in for 2 months...then he's gone and Vitt is back?
Just give the job to Kromer to begin with
This post was edited on 4/12/12 at 4:06 pm
Posted on 4/12/12 at 4:06 pm to quail man
It's disappointing because I'd rather put someone in charge who isn't gonna be suspended. I'm over the Parcells thing. I didn't want a big name. I just didn't want the guy who's incompetent at his current job.
I'd rather have Kromer.
I'd rather have Kromer.
Posted on 4/12/12 at 4:07 pm to eyeran
What exactly do you think Vitt will be doing during preseason? Getting Kromer ready. It's not like he'll hand the keys over to him before week 1 with an empty tank and say "here you go".
This isn't a big deal.
This isn't a big deal.
Posted on 4/12/12 at 4:10 pm to sicboy
Everyone is over thinking this way too much. Just like Payton was doing when thinking of bringing in Parcells.
Posted on 4/12/12 at 4:10 pm to eyeran
I think this could work if we are able to win with what SP has put in place, which is why i say its hubris on his part. He's probably a little too confident.
If however this team meets any kind of adversity, such as a 2-3 game skid, or injury(s) to critical player(s), it will unravel very quickly without a strong leader... and a revolving door in leadership is the worst thing under those circumstances.
This is where i think it would have really helped to bring someone in for the long haul.
If however this team meets any kind of adversity, such as a 2-3 game skid, or injury(s) to critical player(s), it will unravel very quickly without a strong leader... and a revolving door in leadership is the worst thing under those circumstances.
This is where i think it would have really helped to bring someone in for the long haul.
This post was edited on 4/12/12 at 4:13 pm
Posted on 4/12/12 at 4:11 pm to sicboy
quote:
What exactly do you think Vitt will be doing during preseason? Getting Kromer ready
Vitt isnt even good at his own job, he's gonna get someone else ready to be HC?
Posted on 4/12/12 at 4:12 pm to eyeran
Not saying he's perfect. But we aren't going to be in a bind when the season starts. Like Loomis said, this is the same setup they had last year when CSP was out. At least he has SOME grasp of what's involved.
Posted on 4/12/12 at 4:14 pm to sicboy
Definitely dissapointing news, but I guess an outsider was going to be too difficult to manage.
The problem is, if you would havce put Kromer in charge in the first place, you have that consistent head coach and you might even be able to distance yourself from the scandal talk.
Now you hand the keys to someone who was involved and he's facing a suspension of his own.
I remember reading that Kromer didn't really want the gig for the whole season, so I guess that's why he's only filling in weeks 1-6.
Oh well.
The problem is, if you would havce put Kromer in charge in the first place, you have that consistent head coach and you might even be able to distance yourself from the scandal talk.
Now you hand the keys to someone who was involved and he's facing a suspension of his own.
I remember reading that Kromer didn't really want the gig for the whole season, so I guess that's why he's only filling in weeks 1-6.
Oh well.
Posted on 4/12/12 at 4:16 pm to cleeveclever
not liking this situation one bit.
Posted on 4/12/12 at 4:17 pm to sicboy
quote:Yeah, fwiw, I agree we're gonna be fine regardless. Too often people try to turn football into brain surgery. Good teams win, shitty ones don't. The Saints are good.
Not saying he's perfect. But we aren't going to be in a bind when the season starts. Like Loomis said, this is the same setup they had last year when CSP was out. At least he has SOME grasp of what's involved.
I admit, my reaction to this is largely because I can't stand Vitt
Posted on 4/12/12 at 4:18 pm to eyeran
quote:
I admit, my reaction to this is largely because I can't stand Vitt
With you on that.
Posted on 4/12/12 at 4:19 pm to sicboy
I can you NOT love this face?
Posted on 4/12/12 at 4:43 pm to Patrick O Rly
So half of the people here think Vitt sucks at his job?
Bad vibes?
Ugly grand-pa looking dude?
We completly overhaul the LB corp which shows he had shite to work with.
Seemed to fill in well for CSP.
Players seem to have no problem with him.
CSP wants him to coach the last 13 games and thats good enough for me.
He's thought about this issue more than you bozo's and decided to put the 2012-13 season on Vitts shoulders.
I don't get the hand ringing without something concrete to base it on.
Moving on and glad they have found their guy.
Bad vibes?
Ugly grand-pa looking dude?
We completly overhaul the LB corp which shows he had shite to work with.
Seemed to fill in well for CSP.
Players seem to have no problem with him.
CSP wants him to coach the last 13 games and thats good enough for me.
He's thought about this issue more than you bozo's and decided to put the 2012-13 season on Vitts shoulders.
I don't get the hand ringing without something concrete to base it on.
Moving on and glad they have found their guy.
Page 2 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News