Started By
Message
locked post

Easier to get passing yard for today's QBs?

Posted on 12/27/11 at 9:17 am
Posted by skidmark
Member since Feb 2008
365 posts
Posted on 12/27/11 at 9:17 am
Sorry for the ignorance, but I keep hearing this in regards to Brees versus Marino. Why is this so? I'm assuming there have been rule changes since '84 which calculate passing yards differently? If so, what are the changes?
This post was edited on 12/27/11 at 9:19 am
Posted by Pilot Tiger
North Carolina
Member since Nov 2005
73142 posts
Posted on 12/27/11 at 9:18 am to
go watch film from the 80's and see what DB's did to WR's.

And also look how much more often QB's were knocked down after releasing the ball
Posted by udtiger
Over your left shoulder
Member since Nov 2006
98432 posts
Posted on 12/27/11 at 9:20 am to
Defenders used to be able to play much more physically with receivers back in the day. While a lot of the rule changes that Brees has benefitted from went into effect before Marino's season, they were fairly "new" then, and the refs were not calling PI, illegal contact, etc. nearly as close.

Plus, the QB was not nearly as protected as now.

That said, it does not detract from his accomplishment any more than Marino's was less than Fouts'.
Posted by GeauxGus
Baton Rouge
Member since Aug 2005
5219 posts
Posted on 12/27/11 at 9:28 am to
...bogus.. players today are bigger, stronger, faster on BOTH sides of the line of scrimmage - it all equals out .. "rules" changes are adjusted to by more talented players ... for example , did Marino face today's style blitz packages and size strength of DL players .. all the players are better - overall - than 30 years ago .. JMHO...
Posted by blueslover
deeper than deep south
Member since Sep 2007
22792 posts
Posted on 12/27/11 at 9:29 am to
the game as evolved radically. Go back to the Unitas generation before Marino. The average score was prolly something like 20-14. 25 pass attempts was the high end. Half of all passing plays then would today be called roughing the passer. 3/4 of all those pass attempts would now be pass interference. Add that there were 12 & 14 game seasons way back for cumulative numbers. There is definite appreciation to be had of performance relative to eras beyond statistics. That said, it by no means detracts from the significance of the record.

The consecutive TD pass games record is an incredible non cumulative mark that has stood for over 50 years!

Posted by Riverwood
Tha' Frick?
Member since Sep 2009
1689 posts
Posted on 12/27/11 at 9:32 am to
I am sick and tired of hearing how much easier it is for today's quarterbacks to get big numbers.

If it's so much easier, why in the hell has the record stood for twenty fricking seven years?
Posted by GeauxGus
Baton Rouge
Member since Aug 2005
5219 posts
Posted on 12/27/11 at 9:34 am to
...consecutive games with a TD pass = Babe Ruth HR record ... if Brees gets that one it will be epic ...
Posted by Chad504boy
4 posts
Member since Feb 2005
166087 posts
Posted on 12/27/11 at 9:37 am to
quote:

I am sick and tired of hearing how much easier it is for today's quarterbacks to get big numbers.



Okay. DO me a favor. After next week, count the number of 4k plus quarterbacks in the league and compare it to how many did in 1984. Nothing to get all butt hurt about.
Posted by Riverwood
Tha' Frick?
Member since Sep 2009
1689 posts
Posted on 12/27/11 at 9:53 am to
quote:

Okay. DO me a favor.


Sure thing... I'll get right on it.

Posted by Chad504boy
4 posts
Member since Feb 2005
166087 posts
Posted on 12/27/11 at 9:56 am to
quote:


Sure thing... I'll get right on it.





It'll end up 10-3. So what do you make of that?
Posted by Riverwood
Tha' Frick?
Member since Sep 2009
1689 posts
Posted on 12/27/11 at 10:05 am to
quote:

It'll end up 10-3. So what do you make of that?


Here, do it yourself.

I just grabbed a couple of years.

One

Two
Posted by Chad504boy
4 posts
Member since Feb 2005
166087 posts
Posted on 12/27/11 at 10:12 am to
Dude. 10-3. What do you think buddy? You want to cry about it so talk up buddy.
Posted by Riverwood
Tha' Frick?
Member since Sep 2009
1689 posts
Posted on 12/27/11 at 10:17 am to
LOL, GFY... forum crusader.

Posted by Chad504boy
4 posts
Member since Feb 2005
166087 posts
Posted on 12/27/11 at 10:22 am to
quote:

LOL, GFY... forum crusader.






LMAO OMG GN2S SF DMF IBBCBAA
Posted by Sophandros
Victoria Concordia Crescit
Member since Feb 2005
45218 posts
Posted on 12/27/11 at 10:27 am to
Yards per attempt is virtually unchanged from 1984 to today (7.1 vs 7.2--and 1983 was 7.2...). Attempts per game were ~32 per game in 1984 vs ~34 per game today. Those two attempts don't explain it all, though. Today's QBs complete ~60% of their passes, vs ~56% in 1984. This added accuracy also shows up in int%--~2% today vs ~4% in 1984.

Rules changes don't account for all of it. In 84, offenses were built differently. More deep passing, especially. Yes, the rules have changed things slightly in the last 27 years, but it is not as drastic as the talking heads want to make you think.

Oh, and one more thing, when you compare Marino's record season to the average QB in 1984 and do the same with Drew vs the average QB this year, you'll find that Drew's delta is higher than Marino's, both in absolute and in relative measurements. That should silence the bullshite trying to downplay the significance of this acheivement.
Posted by Chad504boy
4 posts
Member since Feb 2005
166087 posts
Posted on 12/27/11 at 10:29 am to
The game of football has evolved into a more passing league with the development of schemes and offenses. I don't think it's entirely strictly about rule changes. In any case it's not like Drew is edging the record by 10 yards, he's knocking it out the park.
Posted by Sophandros
Victoria Concordia Crescit
Member since Feb 2005
45218 posts
Posted on 12/27/11 at 10:31 am to
Oh, and qbs averaged 206 yards per game in 1984, vs 229 today. Much of that is due purely to increased, which is a function of more efficient systems.
Posted by Jumbeauxlaya
LSU
Member since Jan 2011
18083 posts
Posted on 12/27/11 at 11:07 am to
While true, brees is 98 yards above todays average.

Marino was 95 yards above his average.

About the same..
Posted by sheek
The Woodlands, TX
Member since Sep 2007
43891 posts
Posted on 12/27/11 at 11:10 am to
quote:

If it's so much easier, why in the hell has the record stood for twenty fricking seven years?


tru dat. defenses are a bit faster and stronger today too. people forget that.
Posted by Riverwood
Tha' Frick?
Member since Sep 2009
1689 posts
Posted on 12/27/11 at 12:48 pm to
quote:

tru dat. defenses are a bit faster and stronger today too. people forget that.



Explain that to "THE HALL MONITOR"...




first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram