Started By
Message

re: Who was the better QB: Dan Marino or John Elway?

Posted on 12/26/11 at 9:25 pm to
Posted by Paul Allen
Montauk, NY
Member since Nov 2007
75097 posts
Posted on 12/26/11 at 9:25 pm to
Elway got 2 super bowl rings


Posted by D011ahbi11
Member since Jun 2007
13617 posts
Posted on 12/26/11 at 9:30 pm to
quote:

Elway got 2 super bowl rings

I thought we had established that championships were a team stat by now. Guess not
Posted by Suntiger
BR or somewhere else
Member since Feb 2007
32846 posts
Posted on 12/26/11 at 9:59 pm to
Marino.

Elway was more mobile, but Marino was the better passer. Elway was good, really good, but I always though he was a little overrated. And he never wins a Super Bowl without T. Davis. Super Bowls are team achievements.
Posted by Sophandros
Victoria Concordia Crescit
Member since Feb 2005
45218 posts
Posted on 12/26/11 at 11:25 pm to
I know my post is on page 2, but:

IN!
Posted by chinese58
NELA. after 30 years in Dallas.
Member since Jun 2004
30321 posts
Posted on 12/26/11 at 11:35 pm to
I always thought Marino was a better quarterback.

quote:

I thought we had established that championships were a team stat by now. Guess not

never wins a Super Bowl without T. Davis. Super Bowls are team achievements.



I agree.

If any of you Elway lovers are Romo haters you should feel conflicted. Elway was a big improvisor like Romo and Favre. Dan Reeves and Elway had big conflicts over this.

Elway's biggest claim to fame before Terrell Davis and the Super Bowl wins was his number of comeback wins.

Davis' running allowed Elway to settle down and stay within the team's offense more.


Posted by Poodlebrain
Way Right of Rex
Member since Jan 2004
19860 posts
Posted on 12/27/11 at 12:08 am to
quote:

And he never wins a Super Bowl without T. Davis.

Who were the Bronco running backs the other 3 times Elway led them to the Super Bowl? Even without Davis, Elway got to 3 times as many Super Bowls as Marino.
Posted by molsusports
Member since Jul 2004
36104 posts
Posted on 12/27/11 at 12:14 am to
JMO and I'm sure I don't care as much as a bunch of people who really love one or the other

Elway was the better athlete and more versatile player. Marino was the superior passer and teh superior QB IMO
Posted by F machine
Member since Jun 2009
11886 posts
Posted on 12/27/11 at 12:15 am to
The people screaming about sb wins must think roethlisberger is a better qb than qbs like brees, Manning and Steve young.
Posted by baytiger
Boston
Member since Dec 2007
46978 posts
Posted on 12/27/11 at 12:20 am to
quote:


Really close. Both are in my top 5 of all-time.

among retired qb's, I've got them at like 2 and 3 behind Montana and ahead of Unitas

I think Marino edges out Elway though.
Posted by Hopeful Doc
Member since Sep 2010
14932 posts
Posted on 12/27/11 at 12:20 am to
Elway had his own NES football game.



In all seriousness, I always thought of him as the better QB growing up.
This post was edited on 12/27/11 at 12:27 am
Posted by Zamoro10
Member since Jul 2008
14743 posts
Posted on 12/27/11 at 12:23 am to
John Elway - The any era QB.

He was almost the perfect mold from clay all-around QB - fantastic athlete, great speed, fleet of foot and a gift from God as an arm.

Marino was probably the best pure passer ever with his release but if I'm starting a team from any era to move the ball - it's John Elway.
Posted by DelU249
Austria
Member since Dec 2010
77625 posts
Posted on 12/27/11 at 12:50 am to
This is the kind of question where you can tell alot about the person based on their answer... anyone who thinks elway was even in the same class as Marino is borderline retarded. Marino was the superior player in every way. Elway lucked out and hung around long enough to play on a loaded team. his backup in 98, bubby brister actually performed better than him. And SBs are a team accomplishment anyway. Marino's 84 season is still the best all around season by a qb
Posted by Hopeful Doc
Member since Sep 2010
14932 posts
Posted on 12/27/11 at 1:05 am to
quote:

Marino was the superior player in every way.


Marino rushed for 87 yards in his career. Elway ran for 94 at the age of 38 (3407 for the career). Elway did bring another element to the table that Marino couldn't.

Their career records are nearly identical (148-82-1 vs 147-93-0. Marino did have better passing numbers nearly across the board, but he also had 1103 more attempts than Elway. His team relied on his passing attack vs the run, Denver was a more balanced offense. What Elway would have done with an offense like that can't be known, but you can't look at the numbers across the board and say they aren't in the same league, with a slight advantage to Marino.

When it came down to the wire (whether we're talking about playoff runs or late-game drives), Elway is the guy I'd want running the show (probably all-time). There's some 'it' factor I feel falls in his favor.


Again, growing up, I always knew both were great, but I always had a little more respect for Elway.
This post was edited on 12/27/11 at 1:34 am
Posted by GregMaddux
LSU Fan
Member since Jun 2011
18208 posts
Posted on 12/27/11 at 1:43 am to
Dan Marino should die of gonorrhea and rot in hell
Posted by shel311
McKinney, Texas
Member since Aug 2004
110490 posts
Posted on 12/27/11 at 6:59 am to
I got Marino, and i don't think it's close.
Posted by Poodlebrain
Way Right of Rex
Member since Jan 2004
19860 posts
Posted on 12/27/11 at 8:13 am to
quote:

I got Marino, and i don't think it's close.

Dan Marino had impressive stats, but Warren Moon had better stats over his entire career. A QB's job is to make plays on 3rd down and keep drives going. Elway did that better than Marino, and it wasn't close, in games that mattered.
Posted by dukke v
PLUTO
Member since Jul 2006
202511 posts
Posted on 12/27/11 at 8:14 am to
quote:

I got Marino, and i don't think it's close.


Elway. Took his team to 5 sb's 3 basically by himself.
Posted by Party At LSU
Baton Rouge
Member since Nov 2005
10691 posts
Posted on 12/27/11 at 9:08 am to
As far as the debate for, "who was the best overall QB ever," I think you can realistically name about 5 or 6 people and have a solid argument. Quarterback is a vastly complex position, and there are so many aspects that go into making greatness.

Now, as far as who the best pure passer ever was, the only guy who even comes close to Dan Marino is Peyton Manning, and he still isn't even that close.

Just as Ron Jaworski said during the telecast last night even after Brees broke the record, "No one...and I mean no one could throw the ball like Dan Marino."
Posted by theunknownknight
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2005
57212 posts
Posted on 12/27/11 at 9:16 am to
quote:

Elway. Took his team to 5 sb's 3 basically by himself.



And took a big dump when he got there every time. Elway was not that good in comparison to the other great QBs at the time. You put Marino, Montana, Young, or Moon on those teams and Denver wins the SB hands down every one of those years.
This post was edited on 12/27/11 at 9:17 am
Posted by Party At LSU
Baton Rouge
Member since Nov 2005
10691 posts
Posted on 12/27/11 at 9:19 am to
quote:

Marino did have better passing numbers nearly across the board, but he also had 1103 more attempts than Elway.


...while throwing fewer interceptions. Per drop back in their career, Dan Marino is the least intercepted and least sacked QB of all time.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 4Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram